Multi-Model Machine Learning Approach Accurately Predicts Lake Dissolved Oxygen With Multiple Environmental Inputs

被引:1
|
作者
Lin, Shuqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pierson, Donald C. [2 ,3 ]
Ladwig, Robert [4 ]
Kraemer, Benjamin M. [5 ]
Hu, Fenjuan R. S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Canada Ctr Inland Waters, Environm & Climate Change Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada
[2] Uppsala Univ, Erken Lab, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Limnol Dept, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Ctr Limnol, Madison, WI USA
[5] IGB Leibniz Inst Freshwater Ecol & Inland Fisherie, Berlin, Germany
[6] VIA Univ Coll, Res Ctr Bldg Energy Water & Climate, Horsens, Denmark
关键词
LONG-TERM CHANGES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CENTRAL BASIN; NORTH SHORE; HYPOXIA; PHOSPHORUS; DEPLETION; MODEL; VARIABILITY; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1029/2023EA003473
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
As a key water quality parameter, dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, and particularly changes in bottom water DO is fundamental for understanding the biogeochemical processes in lake ecosystems. Based on two machine learning (ML) models, Gradient Boost Regressor (GBR) and long-short-term-memory (LSTM) network, this study developed three ML model approaches: direct GBR; direct LSTM; and a 2-step mixed ML model workflow combining both GBR and LSTM. They were used to simulate multi-year surface and bottom DO concentrations in five lakes. All approaches were trained with readily available environmental data as predictors. Indices of lake thermal structure and mixing provided by a one-dimensional (1-D) hydrodynamic model were also included as predictors in the ML models. The advantages of each ML approach were not consistent for all the tested lakes, but the best one of them was defined that can estimate DO concentration with coefficient of determination (R2) up to 0.6-0.7 in each lake. All three approaches have normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) under 0.15. In a polymictic lake, the 2-step mixed model workflow showed better representation of bottom DO concentrations, with a highest true positive rate (TPR) of hypolimnetic hypoxia detection of over 90%, while the other workflows resulted in, TPRs are around 50%. In most of the tested lakes, the predicted surface DO concentrations and variables indicating stratified conditions (i.e., Wedderburn number and the temperature difference between surface and bottom water) are essential for simulating bottom DO. The ML approaches showed promising results and could be used to support short- and long-term water management plans. Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations is the essential water quality parameter in lake systems. Nowadays, with the development of data-driven machine learning (ML) models, prediction of DO concentrations can be achieved via these models in lakes with long-term DO concentration observations. This study developed three ML model approaches with one mixed two kind of ML models, and test them in five lakes. Readily available environmental data and the derived hydrodynamic data from process-based hydrodynamic model were used as predictors. All three ML approaches showed promising results, and the mixed ML approach show better skill in the lake stratifying and mixing irregularly. To predict hypoxia in the bottom of the lake, the surface DO concentrations and variables indicating water column stratification are important. A 2-step machine learning workflow combining Gradient Boost Regressor and long-short-term-memory was applied to simulate dissolved oxygen A one-dimensional process-based hydrodynamic model provides ML models with indices of lake thermal structure and mixing In a polymictic lake, the 2-step mixed machine learning workflow showed over 90% true positive rate of hypolimnetic hypoxia detection
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] One Step Ahead Energy Load Forecasting: A Multi-model approach utilizing Machine and Deep Learning
    Mystakidis, Aristeidis
    Ntozi, Evangelia
    Afentoulis, Konstantinos
    Koukaras, Paraskevas
    Giannopoulos, Georgios
    Bezas, Napoleon
    Gkaidatzis, Paschalis A.
    Ioannidis, Dimosthenis
    Tjortjis, Christos
    Tzovaras, Dimitrios
    2022 57TH INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (UPEC 2022): BIG DATA AND SMART GRIDS, 2022,
  • [32] Enhancing robustness in machine-learning-accelerated molecular dynamics: A multi-model nonparametric probabilistic approach
    Quek, Ariana
    Ouyang, Niuchang
    Lin, Hung-Min
    Delaire, Olivier
    Guilleminot, Johann
    MECHANICS OF MATERIALS, 2025, 202
  • [33] Research on multi-model ensemble machine learning methods for temperature forecasting
    Beijing Meteorological Service Centre, Beijing, China
    Proc. - Int. Conf. Comput., Inf. Process. Adv. Educ., CIPAE, (428-433):
  • [34] Urban River Dissolved Oxygen Prediction Model Using Machine Learning
    Moon, Juhwan
    Lee, Jaejoon
    Lee, Sangwon
    Yun, Hongsik
    WATER, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [35] A Machine Learning and Remote Sensing-Based Model for Algae Pigment and Dissolved Oxygen Retrieval on a Small Inland Lake
    Beal, Maxwell R. W.
    Ozdogan, Mutlu
    Block, Paul J.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2024, 60 (03)
  • [36] A multi-model approach to engaging stakeholder and modellers in complex environmental problems
    Fulton, Elizabeth A.
    Boschetti, Fabio
    Sporcic, Miriana
    Jones, Tod
    Little, L. Richard
    Dambacher, Jeffrey M.
    Gray, Randall
    Scott, Roger
    Gorton, Rebecca
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 48 : 44 - 56
  • [37] Advancing ocean subsurface thermal structure estimation in the Pacific Ocean: A multi-model ensemble machine learning approach
    Qi, Jifeng
    Zhang, Linlin
    Yin, Baoshu
    Li, Delei
    Xie, Bowen
    Sun, Guimin
    DYNAMICS OF ATMOSPHERES AND OCEANS, 2023, 104
  • [38] An Interpretable Multi-Model Machine Learning Approach for Spatial Mapping of Deep-Sea Polymetallic Nodule Occurrences
    Gazis, Iason-Zois
    Charlet, Francois
    Greinert, Jens
    NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (06) : 2473 - 2501
  • [39] An Optimized Machine Learning Model Accurately Predicts In-Hospital Outcomes at Admission to a Cardiac Unit
    Bollepalli, Sandeep Chandra
    Sahani, Ashish Kumar
    Aslam, Naved
    Mohan, Bishav
    Kulkarni, Kanchan
    Goyal, Abhishek
    Singh, Bhupinder
    Singh, Gurbhej
    Mittal, Ankit
    Tandon, Rohit
    Chhabra, Shibba Takkar
    Wander, Gurpreet S. S.
    Armoundas, Antonis A. A.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (02)
  • [40] Research on multi-model imaging machine learning for distinguishing early hepatocellular carcinoma
    Ma, Ya
    Gong, Yue
    Qiu, Qingtao
    Ma, Changsheng
    Yu, Shuang
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)