Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy Alone for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Selected Biopsy-Naïve Patients: Results from a Retrospective Pilot Study

被引:0
|
作者
Olivetta, Michelangelo [1 ]
Manfredi, Celeste [2 ]
Spirito, Lorenzo [2 ]
Quattrone, Carmelo [2 ]
Bottone, Francesco [2 ]
Stizzo, Marco [2 ]
Amicuzi, Ugo [3 ]
Lecce, Arturo [2 ]
Rubinacci, Andrea [2 ]
Romano, Lorenzo [2 ]
Della Rosa, Giampiero [2 ]
Papi, Salvatore [2 ]
Tammaro, Simone [2 ]
Coppola, Paola [2 ]
Arcaniolo, Davide [2 ]
Fusco, Ferdinando [3 ]
De Sio, Marco [2 ]
机构
[1] G Fucito Hosp, Dept Urol, AOU San Giovanni & Ruggi Aragona, I-84085 Mercato San Severino, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Woman Child & Gen & Specialized Surg, Unit Urol, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[3] AORN Sant Anna & San Sebastiano, Dept Surg Sci, Div Urol, I-81100 Caserta, Italy
关键词
clinically significant prostate cancer; transrectal prostate biopsy; cognitive targeted prostate biopsy;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14151643
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
(1) Background: To identify a particular setting of biopsy-na & iuml;ve patients in which it would be reasonable to offer only cognitive targeted prostate biopsy (PBx) with a transrectal approach. (2) Methods: We designed an observational retrospective pilot study. Patients with a prostatic specific antigen (PSA) level > 10 ng/mL, either a normal or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), and a lesion with a PI-RADS score >= 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone were included. All patients underwent a transrectal PBx, including both systematic and targeted samples. The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason Score >= 7) was chosen as the primary outcome. We described the detection rate of csPCa in systematic PBx, targeted PBx, and overall PBx. (3) A total of 92 patients were included. Prostate cancer was detected in 84 patients (91.30%) with combined biopsies. A csPCa was diagnosed in all positive cases (100%) with combined biopsies. Systematic PBxs were positive in 80 patients (86.96%), while targeted PBxs were positive in 84 men (91.30%). Targeted PBx alone would have allowed the diagnosis of csPCa in all positive cases; systematic PBx alone would have missed the diagnosis of 8/84 (9.52%) csPCa cases (4 negative patients and 4 not csPCa) (p = 0.011). (4) Conclusions: Cognitive targeted PBx with a transrectal approach could be offered alone to diagnose csPCa in biopsy-na & iuml;ve patients with PSA >= 10 ng/mL, either normal or suspicious DRE, and a lesion with PI-RADS score >= 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Following Transrectal and Transperineal Biopsy: Results of the Prostate Biopsy Efficacy and Complications Randomized Clinical Trial Reply
    Ramacciotti, Lorenzo Storino
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 212 (01): : 31 - 31
  • [42] Lesion size may affect diagnostic capabilities of MRI-guided ultrasound fusion biopsy and cognitive targeted biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Shao, I-Hung
    Liao, Fan-Ting
    Chang, Chun-Bi
    Chang, Ying-Hsu
    Wang, Li-Jen
    Huang, Liang-Kang
    Kan, Hung-Cheng
    Lin, Po-Hung
    Yu, Kai-Jie
    Chuang, Cheng-Keng
    Wu, Chun-Te
    Pang, See-Tong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [43] Usefulness of MRI targeted prostate biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with low prostate-specific antigen levels
    Bang, Seokhwan
    Yu, Jiwoong
    Chung, Jae Hoon
    Song, Wan
    Kang, Minyong
    Sung, Hyun Hwan
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [44] Usefulness of MRI targeted prostate biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with low prostate-specific antigen levels
    Seokhwan Bang
    Jiwoong Yu
    Jae Hoon Chung
    Wan Song
    Minyong Kang
    Hyun Hwan Sung
    Hwang Gyun Jeon
    Byong Chang Jeong
    Seong Il Seo
    Hyun Moo Lee
    Seong Soo Jeon
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [45] Multiparametric Pelvic MRI Accuracy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Reevaluation of Biopsy Microfocal Tumor
    Pepe, Pietro
    Dibenedetto, Giuseppe
    Garufi, Antonio
    Priolo, Giandomenico
    Pennisi, Michele
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (01) : 395 - 399
  • [46] Assessing the accuracy of multiparametric MRI to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men across racial/ethnic groups
    Julio Meza
    Rilwan Babajide
    Ragheed Saoud
    Jamila Sweis
    Josephine Abelleira
    Irene Helenowski
    Borko Jovanovic
    Scott Eggener
    Frank H. Miller
    Jeanne M. Horowitz
    David D. Casalino
    Adam B. Murphy
    BMC Urology, 22
  • [47] COMPARISON OF URONAV TRUS AND COGNITIVE FUSION TP BIOPSY IN DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER
    Sherman, Amanda
    Kuftinec, Daneil
    Price, Lori Lyn
    Moinzadeh, Alireza
    Faust, William
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E999 - E1000
  • [48] Utility of Prostate Health Index Density for Biopsy Strategy in Biopsy-Naïve Patients With PI-RADS v2.1 Category 3 Lesions
    Kim, Min Je
    Park, Jung Jae
    Kang, Kyung A.
    Park, Sung Yoon
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 60 (04) : 1628 - 1636
  • [49] NOMOGRAM TO PREDICT ABSENCE OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER ON PATIENTS WITH NEGATIVE MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI UNDERGOING PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Simone, G.
    Panebianco, V
    Barchetti, G.
    Del Monte, M.
    Ceravolo, I
    Campa, R.
    Ciardi, A.
    Ferriero, M.
    Benecchi, L.
    Tuderti, G.
    Misuraca, L.
    Guaglianone, S.
    Masakatsu, O.
    Manju, A.
    Palmer, S.
    Osamu, U.
    Gill, I
    Gallucci, M.
    Abreu, A. L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E608 - E608
  • [50] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in Smaller Prostate
    Wu, Shulin
    Dahl, Douglas
    Kim, Michelle
    Lin, Sharron
    Crotty, Rory
    Cornejo, Kristine
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    Feldman, Adam
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2022, 102 (SUPPL 1) : 697 - 698