Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy Alone for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Selected Biopsy-Naïve Patients: Results from a Retrospective Pilot Study

被引:0
|
作者
Olivetta, Michelangelo [1 ]
Manfredi, Celeste [2 ]
Spirito, Lorenzo [2 ]
Quattrone, Carmelo [2 ]
Bottone, Francesco [2 ]
Stizzo, Marco [2 ]
Amicuzi, Ugo [3 ]
Lecce, Arturo [2 ]
Rubinacci, Andrea [2 ]
Romano, Lorenzo [2 ]
Della Rosa, Giampiero [2 ]
Papi, Salvatore [2 ]
Tammaro, Simone [2 ]
Coppola, Paola [2 ]
Arcaniolo, Davide [2 ]
Fusco, Ferdinando [3 ]
De Sio, Marco [2 ]
机构
[1] G Fucito Hosp, Dept Urol, AOU San Giovanni & Ruggi Aragona, I-84085 Mercato San Severino, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Woman Child & Gen & Specialized Surg, Unit Urol, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[3] AORN Sant Anna & San Sebastiano, Dept Surg Sci, Div Urol, I-81100 Caserta, Italy
关键词
clinically significant prostate cancer; transrectal prostate biopsy; cognitive targeted prostate biopsy;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14151643
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
(1) Background: To identify a particular setting of biopsy-na & iuml;ve patients in which it would be reasonable to offer only cognitive targeted prostate biopsy (PBx) with a transrectal approach. (2) Methods: We designed an observational retrospective pilot study. Patients with a prostatic specific antigen (PSA) level > 10 ng/mL, either a normal or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), and a lesion with a PI-RADS score >= 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone were included. All patients underwent a transrectal PBx, including both systematic and targeted samples. The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason Score >= 7) was chosen as the primary outcome. We described the detection rate of csPCa in systematic PBx, targeted PBx, and overall PBx. (3) A total of 92 patients were included. Prostate cancer was detected in 84 patients (91.30%) with combined biopsies. A csPCa was diagnosed in all positive cases (100%) with combined biopsies. Systematic PBxs were positive in 80 patients (86.96%), while targeted PBxs were positive in 84 men (91.30%). Targeted PBx alone would have allowed the diagnosis of csPCa in all positive cases; systematic PBx alone would have missed the diagnosis of 8/84 (9.52%) csPCa cases (4 negative patients and 4 not csPCa) (p = 0.011). (4) Conclusions: Cognitive targeted PBx with a transrectal approach could be offered alone to diagnose csPCa in biopsy-na & iuml;ve patients with PSA >= 10 ng/mL, either normal or suspicious DRE, and a lesion with PI-RADS score >= 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Utility of MRI fusion-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate health index in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Leow, J.
    Yeow, Y.
    Tan, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 84 - 85
  • [32] Utility of MRI fusion-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy and prostate health index detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Yeow, Y.
    Leow, J.
    Tan, T. W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 31 - 31
  • [33] Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound targeted biopsy versus standard systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer detection: results of a prospective cohort study with 1024 patients
    Zhu Yunkai
    Chen Yaqing
    Jiang Jun
    Qi Tingyue
    Liu Weiyong
    Qu Yuehong
    Guan Wenbin
    Wang Lifeng
    Qi Jun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (05) : 805 - 811
  • [34] Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound targeted biopsy versus standard systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer detection: results of a prospective cohort study with 1024 patients
    Zhu Yunkai
    Chen Yaqing
    Jiang Jun
    Qi Tingyue
    Liu Weiyong
    Qu Yuehong
    Guan Wenbin
    Wang Lifeng
    Qi Jun
    World Journal of Urology, 2019, 37 : 805 - 811
  • [35] mpMRI-targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Baccaglini, Willy
    Glina, Felipe P. A.
    Pazeto, Cristiano L.
    Bernardo, Wanderley M.
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2020, 30 (05) : 711 - 719
  • [36] Low reduction of prostate volume is a significant predictor of prostate cancer at subsequent biopsy in patients with dutasteride: A retrospective study
    Obinata, Daisuke
    Suzuki, Shugo
    Yamanaka, Yataro
    Yoshizawa, Tsuyoshi
    Mochida, Junichi
    Yamaguchi, Kenya
    Takahashi, Satoru
    ANDROLOGIA, 2020, 52 (11)
  • [37] Prospective Evaluation of the Kaiser Permanente Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Biopsy-Naïve Men With Mild PSA Elevations
    Presti Jr, Joseph
    Horton, Brandon
    Alexeeff, Stacey
    Prausnitz, Stephanie
    Avins, Andrew L.
    UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2024, 11 (05)
  • [38] Prostate Histoscanning underperform to detect clinically significant prostate cancer in patients undergoing transperineal template mapping prostate biopsy
    Platkevicius, Gediminas
    Vezelis, Alvydas
    Kincius, Marius
    Naruseviciute, Ieva
    Ulys, Albertas
    Jankevicius, Feliksas
    Preidis, Andrius
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 53 : 31 - 32
  • [39] Diagnostic performance of targeted transrectal MRI-Ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer
    Yuwono, A.
    Tan, T. -W.
    Yeow, Y.
    Lee, C. -H.
    Tan, C. -H.
    Chong, K. -T.
    Lee, Y. -M.
    Png, K. -S.
    Tan, Y. -K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 : 19 - 19
  • [40] Diagnostic Pathway Outcomes for Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Lesions Using Cognitive Registration and Freehand Transperineal Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy-Naïve Men (CRAFT Single-Center Study)
    Fleville, Samara
    O'Neill, Carole
    Safar, Daniel
    Macleod, Alex
    Mulholland, Colin
    Subin, Filip
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 212 (06): : 821 - 831