Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy Alone for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Selected Biopsy-Naïve Patients: Results from a Retrospective Pilot Study

被引:0
|
作者
Olivetta, Michelangelo [1 ]
Manfredi, Celeste [2 ]
Spirito, Lorenzo [2 ]
Quattrone, Carmelo [2 ]
Bottone, Francesco [2 ]
Stizzo, Marco [2 ]
Amicuzi, Ugo [3 ]
Lecce, Arturo [2 ]
Rubinacci, Andrea [2 ]
Romano, Lorenzo [2 ]
Della Rosa, Giampiero [2 ]
Papi, Salvatore [2 ]
Tammaro, Simone [2 ]
Coppola, Paola [2 ]
Arcaniolo, Davide [2 ]
Fusco, Ferdinando [3 ]
De Sio, Marco [2 ]
机构
[1] G Fucito Hosp, Dept Urol, AOU San Giovanni & Ruggi Aragona, I-84085 Mercato San Severino, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Woman Child & Gen & Specialized Surg, Unit Urol, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[3] AORN Sant Anna & San Sebastiano, Dept Surg Sci, Div Urol, I-81100 Caserta, Italy
关键词
clinically significant prostate cancer; transrectal prostate biopsy; cognitive targeted prostate biopsy;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14151643
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
(1) Background: To identify a particular setting of biopsy-na & iuml;ve patients in which it would be reasonable to offer only cognitive targeted prostate biopsy (PBx) with a transrectal approach. (2) Methods: We designed an observational retrospective pilot study. Patients with a prostatic specific antigen (PSA) level > 10 ng/mL, either a normal or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), and a lesion with a PI-RADS score >= 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone were included. All patients underwent a transrectal PBx, including both systematic and targeted samples. The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason Score >= 7) was chosen as the primary outcome. We described the detection rate of csPCa in systematic PBx, targeted PBx, and overall PBx. (3) A total of 92 patients were included. Prostate cancer was detected in 84 patients (91.30%) with combined biopsies. A csPCa was diagnosed in all positive cases (100%) with combined biopsies. Systematic PBxs were positive in 80 patients (86.96%), while targeted PBxs were positive in 84 men (91.30%). Targeted PBx alone would have allowed the diagnosis of csPCa in all positive cases; systematic PBx alone would have missed the diagnosis of 8/84 (9.52%) csPCa cases (4 negative patients and 4 not csPCa) (p = 0.011). (4) Conclusions: Cognitive targeted PBx with a transrectal approach could be offered alone to diagnose csPCa in biopsy-na & iuml;ve patients with PSA >= 10 ng/mL, either normal or suspicious DRE, and a lesion with PI-RADS score >= 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MRI-Targeted, Systematic, or Combined Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Burk, Kristine S.
    Naik, Sachin
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Lee, Leslie K.
    Tempany, Clare
    Cole, Alexander P.
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Khorasani, Ramin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 20 (07) : 687 - 695
  • [22] Is MRI/US Fusion Targeted Biopsy Alone Adequate for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Patients with a Prior Negative Prostate Biopsy?
    Pena, Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez
    Eich, Marie-Lisa
    Porter, Kristin
    Glaser, Zachary
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Gordetsky, Jennifer
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 99
  • [23] Is MRI/US Fusion Targeted Biopsy Alone Adequate for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Patients with a Prior Negative Prostate Biopsy?
    Pena, Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez
    Eich, Marie-Lisa
    Porter, Kristin
    Glaser, Zachary
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Gordetsky, Jennifer
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32
  • [24] Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy
    Vezelis, Alvydas
    Platkevicius, Gediminas
    Kincius, Marius
    Gumbys, Liutauras
    Naruseviciute, Ieva
    Briediene, Ruta
    Petroska, Donatas
    Ulys, Albertas
    Jankevicius, Feliksas
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2021, 57 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [25] Can we predict for missed clinically significant prostate cancers on MRI-Targeted biopsy alone?
    Tsang, W. C.
    Wang, K.
    Quek, A. J. Y.
    Wang, Z.
    Chiong, E.
    Wu, Q.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 : S244 - S244
  • [26] Can we predict for missed clinically significant prostate cancers on MRI-Targeted biopsy alone?
    Tsang, Woon Chau
    Wang, Kaiying
    Quek, Abner Jing Yan
    Wang, Ziting
    Chiong, A. Edmund
    Wu, Qing Hui
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 132 : 24 - 25
  • [27] CAN WE PREDICT FOR MISSED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCERS ON MRI-TARGETED BIOPSY ALONE?
    Tsang, Woon Chau
    Wang, Kaiying
    Quek, Abner
    Wang, Ziting
    Chiong, Edmund
    Wu, Qinghui
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E553 - E553
  • [28] PERFORMANCE OF IN-BORE MR-GUIDED TARGETED PROSTATE BIOPSY FOR DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER: A MULTICENTER STUDY
    Felker, Ely
    Lee-Felker, Stephanie
    Feller, John
    May, Stuart
    Princenthal, Robert
    Cohen, Martin
    Lu, David
    Margolis, Daniel
    Kim, Grace
    Raman, Steven
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E827 - E827
  • [29] Prospective evaluation of the Kaiser Permanente prostate cancer risk calculator in biopsy-naïve men with mild PSA elevations
    Presti, Joseph
    Horton, Brandon
    Alexeeff, Stacey
    Prausnitz, Stephanie
    Avins, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (4_SUPPL) : 290 - 290
  • [30] Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Following Transrectal and Transperineal Biopsy: Results of the Prostate Biopsy Efficacy and Complications Randomized Clinical Trial
    Mian, Badar M.
    Feustel, Paul J.
    Aziz, Asef
    Kaufman Jr, Ronald P.
    Bernstein, Adrien
    Fisher, Hugh A. G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 212 (01): : 21 - 31