Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy Alone for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Selected Biopsy-Naïve Patients: Results from a Retrospective Pilot Study

被引:0
|
作者
Olivetta, Michelangelo [1 ]
Manfredi, Celeste [2 ]
Spirito, Lorenzo [2 ]
Quattrone, Carmelo [2 ]
Bottone, Francesco [2 ]
Stizzo, Marco [2 ]
Amicuzi, Ugo [3 ]
Lecce, Arturo [2 ]
Rubinacci, Andrea [2 ]
Romano, Lorenzo [2 ]
Della Rosa, Giampiero [2 ]
Papi, Salvatore [2 ]
Tammaro, Simone [2 ]
Coppola, Paola [2 ]
Arcaniolo, Davide [2 ]
Fusco, Ferdinando [3 ]
De Sio, Marco [2 ]
机构
[1] G Fucito Hosp, Dept Urol, AOU San Giovanni & Ruggi Aragona, I-84085 Mercato San Severino, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Woman Child & Gen & Specialized Surg, Unit Urol, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[3] AORN Sant Anna & San Sebastiano, Dept Surg Sci, Div Urol, I-81100 Caserta, Italy
关键词
clinically significant prostate cancer; transrectal prostate biopsy; cognitive targeted prostate biopsy;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14151643
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
(1) Background: To identify a particular setting of biopsy-na & iuml;ve patients in which it would be reasonable to offer only cognitive targeted prostate biopsy (PBx) with a transrectal approach. (2) Methods: We designed an observational retrospective pilot study. Patients with a prostatic specific antigen (PSA) level > 10 ng/mL, either a normal or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), and a lesion with a PI-RADS score >= 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone were included. All patients underwent a transrectal PBx, including both systematic and targeted samples. The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason Score >= 7) was chosen as the primary outcome. We described the detection rate of csPCa in systematic PBx, targeted PBx, and overall PBx. (3) A total of 92 patients were included. Prostate cancer was detected in 84 patients (91.30%) with combined biopsies. A csPCa was diagnosed in all positive cases (100%) with combined biopsies. Systematic PBxs were positive in 80 patients (86.96%), while targeted PBxs were positive in 84 men (91.30%). Targeted PBx alone would have allowed the diagnosis of csPCa in all positive cases; systematic PBx alone would have missed the diagnosis of 8/84 (9.52%) csPCa cases (4 negative patients and 4 not csPCa) (p = 0.011). (4) Conclusions: Cognitive targeted PBx with a transrectal approach could be offered alone to diagnose csPCa in biopsy-na & iuml;ve patients with PSA >= 10 ng/mL, either normal or suspicious DRE, and a lesion with PI-RADS score >= 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Prospective Study on the Efficacy of Cognitive Targeted Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Thangarasu, Mathisekaran
    Jayaprakash, Sanjay Prakash
    Selvaraj, Nivash
    Bafna, Sandeep
    Paul, Rajesh
    Mahesh, Chandranathan
    Jain, Nitesh
    Balakrishnan, Arunkumar
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2021, 13 : 207 - 213
  • [2] A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients
    Beibei Hu
    Huili Zhang
    Yueyue Zhang
    Yongming Jin
    Cancer Imaging, 23
  • [3] Impact of changing PI-RADS cutoff on prostate cancer detection by MRI cognitive fusion biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients
    Hesham Abdel-Azim El-Helaly
    Asem Abdel-Aziz Mahmoud
    Ahmed Mohamed Magdy
    Abdelwahab Hasehem
    Hamdy Mohamed Ibrahim
    Khaled Moheyelden Mohamed
    Mohamed Hamdy Ismail
    Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 35
  • [4] Usefulness of urinary biomarker-based risk score and multiparametric MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naïve patients
    Kemesiene, Jurate
    Nicolau, Carlos
    Cholstauskas, Gytis
    Zviniene, Kristina
    Lopeta, Mantvydas
    Veneviciute, Simona
    Asmenaviciute, Ieva
    Tamosauskaite, Kamile
    Pikuniene, Ingrida
    Jievaltas, Mindaugas
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [5] Performance of prostate health index and PSA density in a diverse biopsy-naïve cohort with mpMRI for detecting significant prostate cancer
    Carbunaru, Samuel
    Stinson, James
    Babajide, Rilwan
    Hollowell, Courtney M. P.
    Yang, Ximing
    Sekosan, Marin
    Ferrer, Karen
    Kajdacsy-Balla, Andre
    Abelleira, Josephine
    Ruden, Maria
    King-Lee, Patrice
    Dalton, Daniel P.
    Casalino, David D.
    Kittles, Rick A.
    Gann, Peter H.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Murphy, Adam B.
    BJUI COMPASS, 2021, 2 (06): : 370 - 376
  • [6] Clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate in biopsy-naı<spacing diaeresis>ve patients with mpMRI and microultrasound topographically discordant lesions: A single-center retrospective analysis
    Dagnino, Filippo
    Avolio, Pier Paolo
    Fasulo, Vittorio
    Piccolini, Andrea
    Aljoulani, Muhannad
    Moretto, Stefano
    Maffei, Davide
    Finocchiaro, Alessio
    Beatrici, Edoardo
    Paciotti, Marco
    Saita, Alberto
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Hurle, Rodolfo
    Buffi, Nicolo M.
    Casale, Paolo
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 (12) : 447e11 - 447e16
  • [7] Identifying Optimal Prostate Biopsy Strategy for the Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) in Biopsy-Naïve Population
    Aloufi, Wafa D.
    Al Mopti, Abdulrahman
    Al-Tawil, Anas
    Huang, Zhihong
    Nabi, Ghulam
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [8] A Prospective Study on the Efficacy of Cognitive Targeted Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (vol 13, pg 207, 2021)
    Thangarasu, M.
    Jayaprakash, S. P.
    Selvaraj, N.
    Magesh, Chandranathan
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2021, 13 : 295 - 295
  • [9] Comparison of clinically significant prostate cancer detection by MRI cognitive biopsy and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy for naive biopsy patients
    Zhang, Kai
    Zhang, Zhipeng
    Liu, Ming
    Zhu, Gang
    Roobol, Monique J.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 243 - 249
  • [10] Comparison of clinically significant prostate cancer detection by MRI cognitive biopsy and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy for naive biopsy patients
    Zhang, K.
    Zhang, Z.
    Zhu, G.
    Liu, M.
    Roobol, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 82 - 82