Proton CT on biological phantoms for x-ray CT calibration in proton treatment planning

被引:2
|
作者
Fogazzi, Elena [1 ,2 ]
Bruzzi, Mara [3 ,4 ]
D'Amato, Elvira [1 ]
Farace, Paolo [2 ,5 ]
Righetto, Roberto [2 ,5 ]
Scaringella, Monica [4 ]
Scarpa, Marina [1 ,2 ]
Tommasino, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Civinini, Carlo [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trento, Phys Dept, Via Sommar 14, Povo, TN, Italy
[2] Italian Natl Inst Nucl Phys INFN, Trento Inst Fundamental Phys & Applicat TIFPA, Via Sommar 14, Povo, TN, Italy
[3] Univ Florence, Phys & Astron Dept, Via G Sansone 1, Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy
[4] Italian Natl Inst Nucl Phys INFN, Florence Sect, Via G Sansone 1, Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy
[5] Hosp Trento, Med Phys Unit, Azienda Prov & Serv Sanitari APSS, Via Paolo Orsi 1, Trento, Italy
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2024年 / 69卷 / 13期
关键词
proton therapy; ion imaging; CT calibration; ENERGY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; STOPPING-POWER PREDICTION; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; STOICHIOMETRIC CALIBRATION; EXPERIMENTAL-VERIFICATION; THERAPY; NUMBER; TISSUE; RATIO; HU;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ad56f5
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. To present and characterize a novel method for x-ray computed tomography (xCT) calibration in proton treatment planning, based on proton CT (pCT) measurements on biological phantoms. Approach. A pCT apparatus was used to perform direct measurements of 3D stopping power relative to water (SPR) maps on stabilized, biological phantoms. Two single-energy xCT calibration curves-i.e. tissue substitutes and stoichiometric-were compared to pCT data. Moreover, a new calibration method based on these data was proposed, and verified against intra- and inter-species variability, dependence on stabilization, beam-hardening conditions, and analysis procedures. Main results. Biological phantoms were verified to be stable in time, with a dependence on temperature conditions, especially in the fat region: (-2.5 (sic) 0.5) HU degrees C-1. The pCT measurements were compared with standard xCT calibrations, revealing an average SPR discrepancy within +/- 1.60% for both fat and muscle regions. In the bone region the xCT calibrations overestimated the pCT-measured SPR of the phantom, with a maximum discrepancy of about +3%. As a result, a new cross-calibration curve was directly extracted from the pCT data. Overall, the SPR uncertainty margin associated with this curve was below 3%; fluctuations in the uncertainty values were observed across the HU range. Cross-calibration curves obtained with phantoms made of different animal species and anatomical parts were reproducible with SPR discrepancies within 3%. Moreover, the stabilization procedure did not affect the resulting curve within a 2.2% SPR deviation. Finally, the cross-calibration curve was affected by the beam-hardening conditions on xCTs, especially in the bone region, while dependencies below 2% resulted from the image registration procedure. Significance. Our results showed that pCT measurements on biological phantoms may provide an accurate method for the verification of current xCT calibrations and may represent a tool for the implementation of a new calibration method for proton treatment planning.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of performance of spectral x-ray CT and proton CT for relative stopping power estimation
    Fogazzi, Elena
    Hu, Guyue
    Niepel, Katharina
    Landry, Guillaume
    Scaringella, Monica
    Bruzzi, Mara
    Schwarz, Florian
    Risch, Franka
    Kroencke, Thomas
    Sabel, Bastian
    Ricke, Jens
    Farace, Paolo
    Tommasino, Francesco
    Civinini, Carlo
    Parodi, Katia
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3821 - S3824
  • [22] A spectral calibration technique for x-ray CT
    Johnston, Samuel M.
    Badea, Cristian T.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 8313
  • [23] Treatment Planning and Verification with Proton CT and Proton Radiography to Reduce Range Uncertainties in Proton Therapy
    Schulte, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S242 - S242
  • [24] Proton induced x-ray fluorescence CT (pXFCT) imaging: a step towards proton beam range detection
    Bazalova-Carter, M.
    Ahmad, M.
    Matsuura, T.
    Takao, S.
    Matsuo, Y.
    Fahrig, R.
    Shirato, H.
    Umegaki, K.
    Xing, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S66 - S67
  • [25] Calibration of a Prototype Proton CT Scanner
    Hurley, F.
    Schulte, R.
    Bashkirov, V.
    Wroe, A.
    Ghebremedhin, A.
    Patyal, B.
    Penfold, S.
    Rykalin, V.
    Sadrozinsk, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [26] Experimental Comparison of Proton CT and Dual Energy X-Ray CT in Terms of Relative Stopping Power Accuracy
    Dedes, G.
    Dickmann, J.
    Wesp, P.
    Johnson, R.
    Pankuch, M.
    Bashkirov, V.
    Schulte, R.
    Landry, G.
    Parodi, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E127 - E127
  • [27] A COMPARISON OF PROTON AND MEGAVOLTAGE X-RAY TREATMENT PLANNING FOR PROSTATE-CANCER
    LEE, M
    WYNNE, C
    WEBB, S
    NAHUM, AE
    DEARNALEY, D
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 33 (03) : 239 - 253
  • [28] Comparative treatment planning between proton and x-ray therapy in esophageal cancer
    Isacsson, U
    Lennernäs, B
    Grusell, E
    Jung, B
    Montelius, A
    Glimelius, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (02): : 441 - 450
  • [29] Calibration of the Mars Pathfinder alpha proton X-ray spectrometer
    Foley, CN
    Economou, TE
    Clayton, RN
    Dietrich, W
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 2003, 108 (E12)
  • [30] Combining Proton Radiography and X-Ray CT Information to Better Estimate Relative Proton Stopping Power in a Clinical Environment
    CollinsFekete, C.
    Dias, M.
    Doolan, P.
    Hansen, David C.
    Beaulieu, L.
    Seco, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 163 - 163