Comparison of the recovery time of remimazolam besylate and propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation in elderly patients

被引:3
|
作者
Chen, Hai-yan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiao-xi [3 ]
Lu, Yu -gang [4 ]
Tang, Shu-heng [2 ]
Ding, Tong [2 ]
Song, Jin-Chao [2 ]
Chen, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Qingchun East Rd 3, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Shanghai Sci & Technol, Shidong Hosp Shanghai, Dept Anesthesiol, Shiguang Rd, 999, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Naval Med Univ, Eastern Hepatobillary Surg Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Pulm Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES | 2024年 / 21卷 / 07期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
remimazolam; propofol; recovery time; gastrointestinal endoscopy; elderly patients; PHARMACODYNAMICS; PHARMACOKINETICS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.7150/ijms.93045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Recovery time is a crucial factor in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of both patients and endoscopy centers. Propofol is often preferred due to its fast onset and minimal side effects. Remimazolam is a new intravenous sedative agent, characterized by its rapid onset of action, quick recovery and organ-independent metabolism. Importantly, its effect can be specifically antagonized by flumazenil. The primary goal of this study is to compare the recovery time of remimazolam besylate and propofol anesthesia during endoscopic procedures in elderly patients. Methods: 60 patients aged 65-95 years who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly and equally assigned to two groups: the remimazolam group (Group R) and the propofol group (Group P). The primary measure was the recovery time, defined as the time from discontinuing remimazolam or propofol until reaching an Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation scale (OAA/S) score of 5 (responds readily to name spoken in normal tone). The time required to achieve an OAA/S score of 3 (responds after name spoken loudly or repeatedly along with glazed marked ptosis) was also recorded and compared. Results: The recovery time for Group R (2.6 +/- 1.6 min) was significantly shorter than that for Group P (10.8 +/- 3.0 min), with a 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.949-9.431 min, p <0.001. Similarly, the time to attain an OAA/S score of 3 was significantly less in Group R (1.6 +/- 0.9 min) compared to Group P (9.6 +/- 2.6 min), with a 95% CI: 6.930-8.957 min, p <0.001. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that remimazolam anesthesia combined with flumazenil antagonism causes a shorter recovery time for elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy compared to propofol. Remimazolam followed by flumazenil antagonism provides a promising alternative to propofol for geriatric patients, particularly during gastrointestinal endoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:1250 / 1256
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Propofol and remifentanil for deep sedation in children undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Abu-Shahwan, Ibrahim
    Mack, David
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2007, 17 (05) : 460 - 463
  • [42] Use of Remimazolam for Sedation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Leung, Choy-May
    Hui, Rex Wan-Hin
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 139 (06): : 1872 - 1873
  • [43] Comparison of Recovery Time of Propofol and Midazolam with Propofol Alone for Sedation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
    Samreen, Asma
    Waseem, Aamir
    Azam, Muhammad
    Kazmi, Itrat Hussain
    Bashir, Aamir
    Masud, Sarmad
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (05): : 1024 - 1027
  • [44] PROPOFOL AND REMIFENTANIL FOR DEEP SEDATION IN CHILDREN UNDERGOING GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
    Frattari, A.
    Cacciafiori, G.
    Isacco, V.
    Baldassarre, N.
    Spina, T.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2010, 42 : S327 - S327
  • [45] Safety of propofol/midazolam sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with co-morbidities
    Chen, Xiong
    Zhou, Shouhong
    Liu, Rui
    Xu, Canxia
    Guo, Qin
    Xiao, Dinghua
    Huang, Lihua
    Wang, Fen
    Tang, Wuliang
    Shen, Shourong
    Jiang, Xiwang
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (11): : 12514 - 12522
  • [46] Comparison between the recovery time of alfentanil and fentanyl in balanced propofol sedation for gastrointestinal and colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study
    Ho, Wai-Meng
    Yen, Chia-Ming
    Lan, Chin-Hung
    Lin, Chung-Yi
    Yong, Su-Boon
    Hwang, Kai-Lin
    Chou, Ming-Chih
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [47] Comparison between the recovery time of alfentanil and fentanyl in balanced propofol sedation for gastrointestinal and colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study
    Wai-Meng Ho
    Chia-Ming Yen
    Chin-Hung Lan
    Chung-Yi Lin
    Su-Boon Yong
    Kai-Lin Hwang
    Ming-Chih Chou
    BMC Gastroenterology, 12
  • [48] Comparison of propofol monotherapy and propofol combination therapy for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yoon, Sang Won
    Choi, Geun Joo
    Lee, Oh Haeng
    Yoon, Il Jae
    Kang, Hyun
    Baek, Chong Wha
    Jung, Yong Hun
    Woo, Young Cheol
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 30 (05) : 580 - 591
  • [49] Propofol Combined with Fentanyl Is Superior to Propofol Alone in Sedation Protocols for Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
    Chang, Jie
    Yang, Chun
    JOURNAL OF NANOMATERIALS, 2021, 2021 (2021)
  • [50] Comparison of Remimazolam Tosilate and Propofol Sedation on the Early Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Day Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zhang, Lijuan
    Wang, Zhe
    Liu, Yingge
    Zhang, Xiaobao
    Wu, Yong
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2024, 18 : 1743 - 1754