Comparison of the recovery time of remimazolam besylate and propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation in elderly patients

被引:3
|
作者
Chen, Hai-yan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiao-xi [3 ]
Lu, Yu -gang [4 ]
Tang, Shu-heng [2 ]
Ding, Tong [2 ]
Song, Jin-Chao [2 ]
Chen, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Qingchun East Rd 3, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Shanghai Sci & Technol, Shidong Hosp Shanghai, Dept Anesthesiol, Shiguang Rd, 999, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Naval Med Univ, Eastern Hepatobillary Surg Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Pulm Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES | 2024年 / 21卷 / 07期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
remimazolam; propofol; recovery time; gastrointestinal endoscopy; elderly patients; PHARMACODYNAMICS; PHARMACOKINETICS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.7150/ijms.93045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Recovery time is a crucial factor in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of both patients and endoscopy centers. Propofol is often preferred due to its fast onset and minimal side effects. Remimazolam is a new intravenous sedative agent, characterized by its rapid onset of action, quick recovery and organ-independent metabolism. Importantly, its effect can be specifically antagonized by flumazenil. The primary goal of this study is to compare the recovery time of remimazolam besylate and propofol anesthesia during endoscopic procedures in elderly patients. Methods: 60 patients aged 65-95 years who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly and equally assigned to two groups: the remimazolam group (Group R) and the propofol group (Group P). The primary measure was the recovery time, defined as the time from discontinuing remimazolam or propofol until reaching an Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation scale (OAA/S) score of 5 (responds readily to name spoken in normal tone). The time required to achieve an OAA/S score of 3 (responds after name spoken loudly or repeatedly along with glazed marked ptosis) was also recorded and compared. Results: The recovery time for Group R (2.6 +/- 1.6 min) was significantly shorter than that for Group P (10.8 +/- 3.0 min), with a 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.949-9.431 min, p <0.001. Similarly, the time to attain an OAA/S score of 3 was significantly less in Group R (1.6 +/- 0.9 min) compared to Group P (9.6 +/- 2.6 min), with a 95% CI: 6.930-8.957 min, p <0.001. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that remimazolam anesthesia combined with flumazenil antagonism causes a shorter recovery time for elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy compared to propofol. Remimazolam followed by flumazenil antagonism provides a promising alternative to propofol for geriatric patients, particularly during gastrointestinal endoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:1250 / 1256
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Propofol sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Evaluation of recovery times and safety compared to standard conscious sedation
    Balba, NH
    Al-Kawas, FH
    Harrison, P
    Kulesza, C
    Benjamin, SB
    Carroll, JE
    Chutkan, RK
    Haddad, NG
    Lewis, JH
    Lees, D
    Dougherty, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (09): : S299 - S299
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate versus propofol in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Liauw, R.
    Sutanto, R.
    Subrata, J. A. K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S1389 - S1389
  • [23] Comparison of 95% ETective Dose of Remimazolam Besylate and Propofol for Gastroscopy Sedation on Older Patients:A Single-Centre Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ye, Enci
    Wu, Keyang
    Ye, Hui
    Zhang, Wenyuan
    Chu, Lihua
    Zhang, Kai
    Xie, Guohao
    Jin, Yue
    Fang, Xiangming
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 139 (06): : 2799 - 2801
  • [24] PROPOFOL SEDATION FOR OUTPATIENT UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
    BORGEAT, A
    WILDERSMITH, O
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 68 (01) : 116 - 116
  • [25] Esketamine as an adjuvant to propofol sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Nan Song
    Ke Peng
    Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science, 2 (3):
  • [26] Dexmedetomidine versus propofol for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy in pediatric patients
    Hasanin, Ashraf S.
    Sira, Ahmad M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 30 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [27] Safety of Gastroenterologist-Guided Sedation with Propofol for Upper Gastrointestinal Therapeutic Endoscopy in Elderly Patients Compared with Younger Patients
    Nonaka, Masaya
    Gotoda, Takuji
    Kusano, Chika
    Fukuzawa, Masakatsu
    Itoi, Takao
    Moriyasu, Fuminori
    GUT AND LIVER, 2015, 9 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [28] Inhibitory control test in assessment of recovery from propofol sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Sharma, P.
    Singh, S.
    Kumar, A.
    Kumar, M.
    Tyagi, P.
    Garg, H.
    Kumar, R.
    Sarin, S.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 26 : 157 - 157
  • [29] The comparison of remimazolam and midazolam for the sedation of gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Zhang, Lin
    Li, Chun
    Zhao, Chuncheng
    You, Yulai
    Xu, Jian
    AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 22 (02) : 384 - 391
  • [30] Intravenous sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in very elderly patients of Thailand
    Amornyotin, Somchai
    Srikureja, Wichit
    Pausawasdi, Nonthalee
    Prakanrattana, Ungkab
    Kachintorn, Udom
    ASIAN BIOMEDICINE, 2011, 5 (04) : 485 - 491