Comparison of the recovery time of remimazolam besylate and propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation in elderly patients

被引:3
|
作者
Chen, Hai-yan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiao-xi [3 ]
Lu, Yu -gang [4 ]
Tang, Shu-heng [2 ]
Ding, Tong [2 ]
Song, Jin-Chao [2 ]
Chen, Gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Qingchun East Rd 3, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Shanghai Sci & Technol, Shidong Hosp Shanghai, Dept Anesthesiol, Shiguang Rd, 999, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Naval Med Univ, Eastern Hepatobillary Surg Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Pulm Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES | 2024年 / 21卷 / 07期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
remimazolam; propofol; recovery time; gastrointestinal endoscopy; elderly patients; PHARMACODYNAMICS; PHARMACOKINETICS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.7150/ijms.93045
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Recovery time is a crucial factor in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of both patients and endoscopy centers. Propofol is often preferred due to its fast onset and minimal side effects. Remimazolam is a new intravenous sedative agent, characterized by its rapid onset of action, quick recovery and organ-independent metabolism. Importantly, its effect can be specifically antagonized by flumazenil. The primary goal of this study is to compare the recovery time of remimazolam besylate and propofol anesthesia during endoscopic procedures in elderly patients. Methods: 60 patients aged 65-95 years who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy were randomly and equally assigned to two groups: the remimazolam group (Group R) and the propofol group (Group P). The primary measure was the recovery time, defined as the time from discontinuing remimazolam or propofol until reaching an Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation scale (OAA/S) score of 5 (responds readily to name spoken in normal tone). The time required to achieve an OAA/S score of 3 (responds after name spoken loudly or repeatedly along with glazed marked ptosis) was also recorded and compared. Results: The recovery time for Group R (2.6 +/- 1.6 min) was significantly shorter than that for Group P (10.8 +/- 3.0 min), with a 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.949-9.431 min, p <0.001. Similarly, the time to attain an OAA/S score of 3 was significantly less in Group R (1.6 +/- 0.9 min) compared to Group P (9.6 +/- 2.6 min), with a 95% CI: 6.930-8.957 min, p <0.001. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that remimazolam anesthesia combined with flumazenil antagonism causes a shorter recovery time for elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy compared to propofol. Remimazolam followed by flumazenil antagonism provides a promising alternative to propofol for geriatric patients, particularly during gastrointestinal endoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:1250 / 1256
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Propofol Sedation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Gastroenterologist's Perspective
    Wehrmann, Till
    Triantafyllou, Konstantinos
    DIGESTION, 2010, 82 (02) : 106 - 109
  • [32] Propofol remifentanil deep sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in children
    Ibrahim Abu-Shahwan
    John Thornton
    Khalid Chowdary
    Uwe Schwarz
    Kimmo Murto
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 2005, 52 (Suppl 1): : A150 - A150
  • [33] Comparison of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl combinations for sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized clinical trial
    Falcao, Milena Vasconcelos
    Neto, Joao Nogueira
    Moura, Ed Carlos Rey
    Oliveira, Caio Marcio Barros
    Diniz, Rodrigo Pinto
    Dibai-Filho, Almir Vieira
    Leal, Plinio da Cunha
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 75 (01):
  • [34] Effects of remimazolam tosilate on gastrointestinal hormones and gastrointestinal motility in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation: a randomized control trial
    Yang, Tianyi
    Zhou, Yinji
    Wang, Mingshan
    Zhang, Lina
    Liu, Bing
    Sun, Lixin
    Shi, Fei
    Yuan, Yang
    Zhang, Gaofeng
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 100 (1187) : 635 - 641
  • [35] Propofol sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy arouses euphoria in a large subset of patients
    Brechmann, Thorsten
    Maier, Christoph
    Kaisler, Miriam
    Vollert, Jan
    Schmiegel, Wolff
    Pak, Svetlana
    Scherbaum, Norbert
    Rist, Fred
    Riphaus, Andrea
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 6 (04) : 536 - 546
  • [36] Safety of balanced propofol and midazolam in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for sedation in cirrhotic patients
    Alam, Laima
    Khattak, Mohammad Asif
    Alam, Mafaza
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 71 (01) : 64 - 68
  • [37] The use of remimazolam in gastrointestinal endoscopy for obese patients
    Leng, Xueqian
    Bian, Jinjun
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 48 (01) : 847 - 848
  • [38] Benefits of propofol sedation in high-risk elderly patients undergoing endoscopy
    Carol Lovegrove
    Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2005, 2 (12): : 556 - 557
  • [39] Remimazolam besylate versus propofol for long-term sedation during invasive mechanical ventilation: a pilot study
    Yun Tang
    Xiaobo Yang
    Yuan Yu
    Huaqing Shu
    Yin Yuan
    Hong Liu
    Xiaojing Zou
    Shiying Yuan
    You Shang
    Critical Care, 26
  • [40] Remimazolam besylate versus propofol for long-term sedation during invasive mechanical ventilation: a pilot study
    Tang, Yun
    Yang, Xiaobo
    Yu, Yuan
    Shu, Huaqing
    Yuan, Yin
    Liu, Hong
    Zou, Xiaojing
    Yuan, Shiying
    Shang, You
    CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 26 (01)