Robot-assisted surgery for dental implant placement: A narrative review

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Miaozhen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Feng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Zhao, Xu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wu, Yuwei [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Sch &N Hosp Stomatol, Clin Div 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Engn Lab Digital & Mat Technol Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Key Lab Digital Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Clin Div 2, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] 37 Xishiku St, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
关键词
Accuracy; Computer-assisted surgery; Robot-assisted surgery; Implant placement; Digital dentistry; Robotic surgical procedure; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ACCURACY; NAVIGATION; COMPLICATIONS; TECHNOLOGY; DENTISTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105034
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the current status and accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) applications by examining the associated clinical and experimental outcomes. Data and sources: PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies published between January 2000 and November 2023, and focusing on robotic CAIS in dental implant surgery. All search results were then manually reviewed to identify only the pertinent articles. Only in vitro and clinical studies were included in this narrative review, with implant placement accuracy considered the main outcome. Result: Based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 21 studies (with 1085 implant sites); of them, 8 were clinical studies, 12 were in vitro studies, and 1 included both an in vitro study and a case series. The ranges of the mean implant shoulder, apical, and angular deviations were respectively 0.43-1.04 mm, 0.53-1.06 mm, and 0.77 degrees-3.77 degrees in the clinical studies and 0.23-1.04 mm, 0.24-2.13 mm, and 0.43 degrees-3.78 degrees in the in vitro studies, respectively. Conclusion: The accuracy of robotic CAIS in dental implant procedures appears to be within the clinically acceptable ranges. However, further relevant clinical trials validating the existing evidence are needed. Clinical significance: Robotic CAIS can achieve clinically acceptable implant placement accuracy. This innovative technology may improve the precision and success rates of dental implant procedures, with benefit for surgeons and patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robot-assisted surgery competencies
    Fearon, Mary C.
    AORN JOURNAL, 2017, 105 (05) : 516 - 516
  • [42] Robot-assisted abdominal surgery
    Gutt, CN
    Oniu, T
    Mehrabi, A
    Kashfi, A
    Schemmer, P
    Büchler, MW
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (11) : 1390 - 1397
  • [43] Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology
    Liu, Hongqian
    Lawrie, Theresa A.
    Lu, DongHao
    Song, Huan
    Wang, Lei
    Shi, Gang
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (12):
  • [44] Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery
    Kim, Young Il
    EWHA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 45 (04):
  • [45] Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology
    Lawrie, Theresa A.
    Liu, Hongqian
    Lu, DongHao
    Dowswell, Therese
    Song, Huan
    Wang, Lei
    Shi, Gang
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (04):
  • [46] Robot-Assisted Lung Surgery
    Cheufou, Danjouma
    Baldes, Natalie
    Lechner, Sebastian
    Moeller, Thorben
    Steinert, Matthias
    Boeluekbas, Servet
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2021, 146 : S26 - S30
  • [47] Training in robot-assisted surgery
    Puliatti, Stefano
    Mazzone, Elio
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [48] Robot-assisted ophthalmic surgery
    Fine, Howard F.
    Wei, Wei
    Goldman, Roger E.
    Simaan, Nabil
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2010, 45 (06): : 581 - 584
  • [49] Robot-Assisted Cardiac Surgery
    Ishikawa, Norihiko
    Watanabe, Go
    ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 21 (04) : 322 - 328
  • [50] Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology
    Oehler, Martin K.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 49 (02): : 124 - 129