Robot-assisted surgery for dental implant placement: A narrative review

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Miaozhen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Feng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Zhao, Xu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wu, Yuwei [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Sch &N Hosp Stomatol, Clin Div 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Engn Lab Digital & Mat Technol Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Key Lab Digital Stomatol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Clin Div 2, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] 37 Xishiku St, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
关键词
Accuracy; Computer-assisted surgery; Robot-assisted surgery; Implant placement; Digital dentistry; Robotic surgical procedure; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ACCURACY; NAVIGATION; COMPLICATIONS; TECHNOLOGY; DENTISTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105034
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the current status and accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) applications by examining the associated clinical and experimental outcomes. Data and sources: PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies published between January 2000 and November 2023, and focusing on robotic CAIS in dental implant surgery. All search results were then manually reviewed to identify only the pertinent articles. Only in vitro and clinical studies were included in this narrative review, with implant placement accuracy considered the main outcome. Result: Based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 21 studies (with 1085 implant sites); of them, 8 were clinical studies, 12 were in vitro studies, and 1 included both an in vitro study and a case series. The ranges of the mean implant shoulder, apical, and angular deviations were respectively 0.43-1.04 mm, 0.53-1.06 mm, and 0.77 degrees-3.77 degrees in the clinical studies and 0.23-1.04 mm, 0.24-2.13 mm, and 0.43 degrees-3.78 degrees in the in vitro studies, respectively. Conclusion: The accuracy of robotic CAIS in dental implant procedures appears to be within the clinically acceptable ranges. However, further relevant clinical trials validating the existing evidence are needed. Clinical significance: Robotic CAIS can achieve clinically acceptable implant placement accuracy. This innovative technology may improve the precision and success rates of dental implant procedures, with benefit for surgeons and patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What is new in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a narrative review
    Martini, Alberto
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Briganti, Alberto
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 14 - 18
  • [22] Dexterity optimization by port placement in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery
    Selha, S
    Dupont, P
    Howe, R
    Torchiana, D
    TELEMANIPULATOR AND TELEPRESENCE TECHNOLOGIES VIII, 2002, 4570 : 97 - 104
  • [23] Accuracy of implant placement with computer-aided static, dynamic, and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
    Angkoon Khaohoen
    Warit Powcharoen
    Tanapon Sornsuwan
    Pisaisit Chaijareenont
    Chaiy Rungsiyakull
    Pimduen Rungsiyakull
    BMC Oral Health, 24
  • [24] Optimizing port placement for robot-assisted minimally invasive cardiac surgery
    Trejos, A. L.
    Patel, R. V.
    Ross, I.
    Kiaii, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2007, 3 (04): : 355 - 364
  • [25] Accuracy of implant placement with computer-aided static, dynamic, and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials
    Khaohoen, Angkoon
    Powcharoen, Warit
    Sornsuwan, Tanapon
    Chaijareenont, Pisaisit
    Rungsiyakull, Chaiy
    Rungsiyakull, Pimduen
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [26] Systematic review of learning curves in robot-assisted surgery
    Soomro, N. A.
    Hashimoto, D. A.
    Porteous, A. J.
    Ridley, C. J. A.
    Marsh, W. J.
    Ditto, R.
    Roy, S.
    BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (01): : 27 - 44
  • [27] Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the literature
    Strijker, Marin
    van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    Rinkes, Inne H. M. Borel
    Vriens, Menno R.
    Molenaar, I. Quintus
    HPB, 2013, 15 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [28] Robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic floor surgery: Review
    Daykan, Yair
    Rotem, Reut
    O'Reilly, Barry A.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 91
  • [29] Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement
    Schwendner, Maximilian
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2023, 35 (01): : 37 - 42
  • [30] Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Hepatic Surgery: An Historical Review
    Shimizu, Atsushi
    Ito, Miwa
    Lefor, Alan Kawarai
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (12)