Treatment plan complexity quantification for predicting gamma passing rates in patient-specific quality assurance for stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy

被引:1
|
作者
Xue, Xudong [1 ]
Luan, Shunyao [1 ,2 ]
Ding, Yi [1 ]
Li, Xiangbin [1 ]
Li, Dan [1 ]
Wang, Jingya [1 ]
Ma, Chi [3 ]
Jiang, Man [4 ]
Wei, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Xiao [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Hubei Canc Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Optoelect Engn, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Dept Nucl Engn & Technol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
complexity metric; machine learning; quality assurance; stereotactic VMAT; APERTURE COMPLEXITY; IMRT; METRICS; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14432
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the beam complexity of stereotactic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans quantitively and predict gamma passing rates (GPRs) using machine learning. Methods The entire dataset is exclusively made of stereotactic VMAT plans (301 plans with 594 beams) from Varian Edge LINAC. The GPRs were analyzed using Varian's portal dosimetry with 2%/2 mm criteria. A total of 27 metrics were calculated to investigate the correlation between metrics and GPRs. Random forest and gradient boosting models were developed and trained to predict the GPRs based on the extracted complexity features. The threshold values of complexity metric were obtained to predict a given beam to pass or fail from ROC curve analysis. Results The three moderately significant values of Spearman's rank correlation to GPRs were 0.508 (p < 0.001), 0.445 (p < 0.001), and -0.416 (p < 0.001) for proposed metric LAAM, the ratio of the average aperture area over jaw area (AAJA) and index of modulation, respectively. The random forest method achieved 98.74% prediction accuracy with mean absolute error of 1.23% using five-fold cross-validation, and 98.71% with 1.25% for gradient boosting regressor method, respectively. LAAM, leaf travelling distance (LT), AAJA, LT modulation complexity score (LTMCS) and index of modulation, were the top five most important complexity features. The LAAM metric showed the best performance with AUC value of 0.801, and threshold value of 0.365. Conclusions The calculated metrics were effective in quantifying the complexity of stereotactic VMAT plans. We have demonstrated that the GPRs could be accurately predicted using machine learning methods based on extracted complexity metrics. The quantification of complexity and machine learning methods have the potential to improve stereotactic treatment planning and identify the failure of QA results promptly.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment Plan Complexity Quantification for Predicting Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Xudong, X.
    Ding, Y.
    Wei, W.
    Ma, C.
    Wang, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E286 - E287
  • [2] Integrating plan complexity and dosiomics features with deep learning in patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Han, Ce
    Zhang, Ji
    Yu, Bing
    Zheng, Haoze
    Wu, Yibo
    Lin, Zhixi
    Ning, Boda
    Yi, Jinling
    Xie, Congying
    Jin, Xiance
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [3] Integrating plan complexity and dosiomics features with deep learning in patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Ce Han
    Ji Zhang
    Bing Yu
    Haoze Zheng
    Yibo Wu
    Zhixi Lin
    Boda Ning
    Jinling Yi
    Congying Xie
    Xiance Jin
    Radiation Oncology, 18
  • [4] A study on the correlation between plan complexity and gamma index analysis in patient specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Rajasekaran, Dhanabalan
    Jeevanandam, Prakash
    Sukumar, Prabakar
    Ranganathan, Arulpandiyan
    Johnjothi, Samdevakumar
    Nagarajan, Vivekanandan
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2015, 20 (01) : 57 - 65
  • [5] A Systematic Approach to Patient-Specific Quality Assurance for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    SONG Yu-lin
    Ceferino Obcemea
    Boris Mueller
    Borys Mychalczak
    Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2015, 24 (02) : 58 - 65
  • [6] Statistical analysis of correlation of gamma passing results for two quality assurance phantoms used for patient-specific quality assurance in volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy
    Kunii, Yuki
    Tanabe, Yoshinori
    Nakamoto, Akira
    Nishioka, Kunio
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2022, 47 (04) : 329 - 333
  • [7] A retrospective analysis for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans
    Li, Guangjun
    Wu, Kui
    Peng, Guang
    Zhang, Yingjie
    Bai, Sen
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (04) : 309 - 313
  • [8] A TPS integrated machine learning tool for predicting patient-specific quality assurance outcomes in volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Noblet, Caroline
    Maunet, Mathis
    Duthy, Marie
    Coste, Frederic
    Moreau, Matthieu
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 118
  • [9] Virtual pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy using deep learning
    Yoganathan, S. A.
    Ahmed, Sharib
    Paloor, Satheesh
    Torfeh, Tarraf
    Aouadi, Souha
    Al-Hammadi, Noora
    Hammoud, Rabih
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (12) : 7891 - 7903
  • [10] Using an Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Patient-Specific Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Quality Assurance
    Bakhtiari, M.
    Kumaraswamy, L.
    de Boer, S.
    Malhotra, H.
    Podgorsak, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3087 - +