Integrating plan complexity and dosiomics features with deep learning in patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy

被引:4
|
作者
Han, Ce [1 ]
Zhang, Ji [1 ]
Yu, Bing [1 ]
Zheng, Haoze [1 ]
Wu, Yibo [1 ]
Lin, Zhixi [1 ]
Ning, Boda [1 ]
Yi, Jinling [1 ]
Xie, Congying [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Xiance [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Radiotherapy Ctr, Affiliated Hosp 1, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Med & Radiat Oncol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Wenzhou Med Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Deep learning; Dosiomics feature; Plan complexity; Classification; Patient-specific quality assurance; RADIOMIC ANALYSIS; IMRT; VMAT; RADIOTHERAPY; SYSTEM; DELIVERABILITY; ERRORS; BEAM;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-023-02311-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeTo investigate the feasibility and performance of deep learning (DL) models combined with plan complexity (PC) and dosiomics features in the patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for patients underwent volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).MethodsTotal of 201 VMAT plans with measured PSQA results were retrospectively enrolled and divided into training and testing sets randomly at 7:3. PC metrics were calculated using house-built algorithm based on Matlab. Dosiomics features were extracted and selected using Random Forest (RF) from planning target volume (PTV) and overlap regions with 3D dose distributions. The top 50 dosiomics and 5 PC features were selected based on feature importance screening. A DL DenseNet was adapted and trained for the PSQA prediction.ResultsThe measured average gamma passing rate (GPR) of these VMAT plans was 97.94% & PLUSMN; 1.87%, 94.33% & PLUSMN; 3.22%, and 87.27% & PLUSMN; 4.81% at the criteria of 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm, respectively. Models with PC features alone demonstrated the lowest area under curve (AUC). The AUC and sensitivity of PC and dosiomics (D) combined model at 2%/2 mm were 0.915 and 0.833, respectively. The AUCs of DL models were improved from 0.943, 0.849, 0.841 to 0.948, 0.890, 0.942 in the combined models (PC + D + DL) at 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm and 2%/2 mm, respectively. A best AUC of 0.942 with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%, 81.8%, and 83.6% was achieved with combined model (PC + D + DL) at 2%/2 mm.ConclusionsIntegrating DL with dosiomics and PC metrics is promising in the prediction of GPRs in PSQA for patients underwent VMAT.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating plan complexity and dosiomics features with deep learning in patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Ce Han
    Ji Zhang
    Bing Yu
    Haoze Zheng
    Yibo Wu
    Zhixi Lin
    Boda Ning
    Jinling Yi
    Congying Xie
    Xiance Jin
    Radiation Oncology, 18
  • [2] Treatment Plan Complexity Quantification for Predicting Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of Stereotactic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Xudong, X.
    Ding, Y.
    Wei, W.
    Ma, C.
    Wang, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E286 - E287
  • [3] Virtual pretreatment patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy using deep learning
    Yoganathan, S. A.
    Ahmed, Sharib
    Paloor, Satheesh
    Torfeh, Tarraf
    Aouadi, Souha
    Al-Hammadi, Noora
    Hammoud, Rabih
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (12) : 7891 - 7903
  • [4] A Systematic Approach to Patient-Specific Quality Assurance for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    SONG Yu-lin
    Ceferino Obcemea
    Boris Mueller
    Borys Mychalczak
    Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2015, 24 (02) : 58 - 65
  • [5] Treatment plan complexity quantification for predicting gamma passing rates in patient-specific quality assurance for stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Xue, Xudong
    Luan, Shunyao
    Ding, Yi
    Li, Xiangbin
    Li, Dan
    Wang, Jingya
    Ma, Chi
    Jiang, Man
    Wei, Wei
    Wang, Xiao
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (09):
  • [6] Improvement Using Planomics Features on Prediction and Classification of Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Using Head and Neck Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plan
    Li, Bing
    Chen, Junying
    Guo, Wei
    Mao, Ronghu
    Zheng, Xiaoli
    Cheng, Xiuyan
    Cui, Tiantian
    Lou, Zhaoyang
    Wang, Ting
    Li, Dingjie
    Tao, Hongyan
    Lei, Hongchang
    Ge, Hong
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [7] A retrospective analysis for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans
    Li, Guangjun
    Wu, Kui
    Peng, Guang
    Zhang, Yingjie
    Bai, Sen
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (04) : 309 - 313
  • [8] Deep learning for patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy: Prediction accuracy and cost-sensitive classification performance
    Li, Guangjun
    Duan, Lian
    Xie, Lizhang
    Hu, Ting
    Wei, Weige
    Bai, Long
    Xiao, Qing
    Liu, Wenjie
    Zhang, Lei
    Bai, Sen
    Yi, Zhang
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 125
  • [9] A study on the correlation between plan complexity and gamma index analysis in patient specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Rajasekaran, Dhanabalan
    Jeevanandam, Prakash
    Sukumar, Prabakar
    Ranganathan, Arulpandiyan
    Johnjothi, Samdevakumar
    Nagarajan, Vivekanandan
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2015, 20 (01) : 57 - 65
  • [10] Machine learning and lean six sigma for targeted patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans
    Lambri, Nicola
    Dei, Damiano
    Goretti, Giulia
    Crespi, Leonardo
    Brioso, Ricardo Coimbra
    Pelizzoli, Marco
    Parabicoli, Sara
    Bresolin, Andrea
    Gallo, Pasqualina
    La Fauci, Francesco
    Lobefalo, Francesca
    Paganini, Lucia
    Reggiori, Giacomo
    Loiacono, Daniele
    Franzese, Ciro
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Scorsetti, Marta
    Mancosu, Pietro
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31