Integrating plan complexity and dosiomics features with deep learning in patient-specific quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy

被引:4
|
作者
Han, Ce [1 ]
Zhang, Ji [1 ]
Yu, Bing [1 ]
Zheng, Haoze [1 ]
Wu, Yibo [1 ]
Lin, Zhixi [1 ]
Ning, Boda [1 ]
Yi, Jinling [1 ]
Xie, Congying [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Xiance [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Radiotherapy Ctr, Affiliated Hosp 1, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Dept Med & Radiat Oncol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Wenzhou Med Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Deep learning; Dosiomics feature; Plan complexity; Classification; Patient-specific quality assurance; RADIOMIC ANALYSIS; IMRT; VMAT; RADIOTHERAPY; SYSTEM; DELIVERABILITY; ERRORS; BEAM;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-023-02311-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeTo investigate the feasibility and performance of deep learning (DL) models combined with plan complexity (PC) and dosiomics features in the patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for patients underwent volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).MethodsTotal of 201 VMAT plans with measured PSQA results were retrospectively enrolled and divided into training and testing sets randomly at 7:3. PC metrics were calculated using house-built algorithm based on Matlab. Dosiomics features were extracted and selected using Random Forest (RF) from planning target volume (PTV) and overlap regions with 3D dose distributions. The top 50 dosiomics and 5 PC features were selected based on feature importance screening. A DL DenseNet was adapted and trained for the PSQA prediction.ResultsThe measured average gamma passing rate (GPR) of these VMAT plans was 97.94% & PLUSMN; 1.87%, 94.33% & PLUSMN; 3.22%, and 87.27% & PLUSMN; 4.81% at the criteria of 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm, respectively. Models with PC features alone demonstrated the lowest area under curve (AUC). The AUC and sensitivity of PC and dosiomics (D) combined model at 2%/2 mm were 0.915 and 0.833, respectively. The AUCs of DL models were improved from 0.943, 0.849, 0.841 to 0.948, 0.890, 0.942 in the combined models (PC + D + DL) at 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm and 2%/2 mm, respectively. A best AUC of 0.942 with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 100%, 81.8%, and 83.6% was achieved with combined model (PC + D + DL) at 2%/2 mm.ConclusionsIntegrating DL with dosiomics and PC metrics is promising in the prediction of GPRs in PSQA for patients underwent VMAT.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Systematic method for a deep learning-based prediction model for gamma evaluation in patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Tomori, Seiji
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Kajikawa, Tomohiro
    Kimura, Yuto
    Narazaki, Kakutarou
    Ochi, Takahiro
    Jingu, Keiichi
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (03) : 1003 - 1018
  • [12] Using an Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Patient-Specific Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Quality Assurance
    Bakhtiari, M.
    Kumaraswamy, L.
    de Boer, S.
    Malhotra, H.
    Podgorsak, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3087 - +
  • [13] Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Protocol for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy using Dose Volume Histogram
    Low, Christopher
    Toye, Warren
    Phung, Peter
    Huston, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 43 (02) : 112 - 118
  • [14] Reduction of systematic dosimetric uncertainties in volumetric modulated arc therapy triggered by patient-specific quality assurance
    Mans, Anton
    Rozendaal, Roel
    Janssen, Tomas
    Damen, Eugene
    Kaas, Jochem
    van Mourik, Anke
    Mijnheer, Ben
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 21 : 6 - 10
  • [15] Correlation between patient-specific quality assurance in volumetric modulated arc therapy and 2D dose image features
    Yixiao Guo
    Jinyan Hu
    Yang Li
    Juntao Ran
    Hongyi Cai
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [16] Correlation between patient-specific quality assurance in volumetric modulated arc therapy and 2D dose image features
    Guo, Yixiao
    Hu, Jinyan
    Li, Yang
    Ran, Juntao
    Cai, Hongyi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [17] Comparison of action levels for patient-specific quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy treatments
    Mancuso, Gordon M.
    Fontenot, Jonas D.
    Gibbons, John P.
    Parker, Brent C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (07) : 4378 - 4385
  • [18] A TPS integrated machine learning tool for predicting patient-specific quality assurance outcomes in volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Noblet, Caroline
    Maunet, Mathis
    Duthy, Marie
    Coste, Frederic
    Moreau, Matthieu
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 118
  • [19] Prospective Clinical Validation of Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Radiation Therapy Plans
    Wall, Phillip D. H.
    Hirata, Emily
    Morin, Olivier
    Valdes, Gilmer
    Witztum, Alon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 113 (05): : 1091 - 1102
  • [20] Sensitivity of Three Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Systems to MLC Aperture Errors With Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Hu, Jinyou
    Gu, Shaoxian
    Wang, Ningyu
    Cui, Fengjie
    Zhang, Shengyuan
    Yin, Chuou
    Cai, Yunzhu
    Gou, Chengjun
    Zou, Lian
    Wu, Zhangwen
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2022, 21