Treatment plan complexity quantification for predicting gamma passing rates in patient-specific quality assurance for stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy

被引:1
|
作者
Xue, Xudong [1 ]
Luan, Shunyao [1 ,2 ]
Ding, Yi [1 ]
Li, Xiangbin [1 ]
Li, Dan [1 ]
Wang, Jingya [1 ]
Ma, Chi [3 ]
Jiang, Man [4 ]
Wei, Wei [1 ]
Wang, Xiao [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Hubei Canc Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Optoelect Engn, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Dept Nucl Engn & Technol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
complexity metric; machine learning; quality assurance; stereotactic VMAT; APERTURE COMPLEXITY; IMRT; METRICS; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14432
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the beam complexity of stereotactic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans quantitively and predict gamma passing rates (GPRs) using machine learning. Methods The entire dataset is exclusively made of stereotactic VMAT plans (301 plans with 594 beams) from Varian Edge LINAC. The GPRs were analyzed using Varian's portal dosimetry with 2%/2 mm criteria. A total of 27 metrics were calculated to investigate the correlation between metrics and GPRs. Random forest and gradient boosting models were developed and trained to predict the GPRs based on the extracted complexity features. The threshold values of complexity metric were obtained to predict a given beam to pass or fail from ROC curve analysis. Results The three moderately significant values of Spearman's rank correlation to GPRs were 0.508 (p < 0.001), 0.445 (p < 0.001), and -0.416 (p < 0.001) for proposed metric LAAM, the ratio of the average aperture area over jaw area (AAJA) and index of modulation, respectively. The random forest method achieved 98.74% prediction accuracy with mean absolute error of 1.23% using five-fold cross-validation, and 98.71% with 1.25% for gradient boosting regressor method, respectively. LAAM, leaf travelling distance (LT), AAJA, LT modulation complexity score (LTMCS) and index of modulation, were the top five most important complexity features. The LAAM metric showed the best performance with AUC value of 0.801, and threshold value of 0.365. Conclusions The calculated metrics were effective in quantifying the complexity of stereotactic VMAT plans. We have demonstrated that the GPRs could be accurately predicted using machine learning methods based on extracted complexity metrics. The quantification of complexity and machine learning methods have the potential to improve stereotactic treatment planning and identify the failure of QA results promptly.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic method for a deep learning-based prediction model for gamma evaluation in patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Tomori, Seiji
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Kajikawa, Tomohiro
    Kimura, Yuto
    Narazaki, Kakutarou
    Ochi, Takahiro
    Jingu, Keiichi
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (03) : 1003 - 1018
  • [22] Electronic Portal Imaging Device in Pre-Treatment Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy delivery
    Lau, M. L.
    Abdullah, R.
    Jayamani, J.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 22
  • [23] Verification of patient specific quality assurance system for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
    Amoabeng, Kwame Anokye
    Marthinsen, Anne Beate Langeland
    Hasford, Francis
    Tagoe, Samuel Nii Adu
    Anaafi, Evelyn
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 12 (04) : 779 - 786
  • [24] Verification of patient specific quality assurance system for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
    Kwame Anokye Amoabeng
    Anne Beate Langeland Marthinsen
    Francis Hasford
    Samuel Nii Adu Tagoe
    Evelyn Anaafi
    Health and Technology, 2022, 12 : 779 - 786
  • [25] Effect of dose grid resolution on the results of patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Chun, M.
    Kim, J., I
    Oh, G. H.
    Wu, H. G.
    Park, J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2020, 18 (03): : 521 - 530
  • [26] Dosimetric Validation for Patient-specific Quality Assurance using the Delta44 Phantom with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Arino Gil, A.
    Calvo, O.
    Gutierrez, A.
    Papanikolau, N.
    Hdez-Armas, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S717 - S717
  • [27] Machine learning and lean six sigma for targeted patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans
    Lambri, Nicola
    Dei, Damiano
    Goretti, Giulia
    Crespi, Leonardo
    Brioso, Ricardo Coimbra
    Pelizzoli, Marco
    Parabicoli, Sara
    Bresolin, Andrea
    Gallo, Pasqualina
    La Fauci, Francesco
    Lobefalo, Francesca
    Paganini, Lucia
    Reggiori, Giacomo
    Loiacono, Daniele
    Franzese, Ciro
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Scorsetti, Marta
    Mancosu, Pietro
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31
  • [28] Development of a plan complexity mitigation algorithm based on gamma passing rate predictions for volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Ono, Tomohiro
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Ono, Yuka
    Nakamura, Kiyonao
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (03) : 1793 - 1802
  • [29] Cloud-Based Monte Carlo Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (QA) Method for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
    Chen, X.
    Xing, L.
    Azcona, J.
    Luxton, G.
    Bush, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 237 - 238
  • [30] Patient specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy of synchronous bilateral breast cancer
    Zamo, Francis C. Djoumessi
    Njeh, Christopher F.
    Colliaux, Anthony
    Blot-Lafond, Valerie
    Moyo, M. Ndontchueng
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2024, 49 (03) : 177 - 184