Explanations of Symbolic Reasoning to Effect Patient Persuasion and Education

被引:0
|
作者
Van Woensel, William [1 ]
Scioscia, Floriano [2 ]
Loseto, Giuseppe [3 ]
Seneviratne, Oshani [4 ]
Patton, Evan [5 ]
Abidi, Samina [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, 55 Laurier E, Ottawa, ON K1N6N5, Canada
[2] Polytechn Univ Bari, I-70125 Bari, BA, Italy
[3] LUM Giuseppe Degennaro Univ, I-70010 Casamassima, BA, Italy
[4] Rensselaer Polytechn Inst, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[5] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02143 USA
[6] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax, NS B3H4R2, Canada
关键词
Explainable Decision Support; Patient Self-Management; Semantic Web; LINKED DATA;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-54303-6_7
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Artificial Intelligence (AI) models can issue smart, contextsensitive recommendations to help patients self-manage their illnesses, including medication regimens, dietary habits, physical activity, and avoiding flare-ups. Instead of merely positing an "edict," the AI model can also explain why the recommendation was issued: why one should stay indoors (e.g., increased risk of flare-ups), why further calorie intake should be avoided (e.g., met the daily limit), or why the care provider should be contacted (e.g., prescription change). The goal of these explanations is to achieve understanding and persuasion effects, which, in turn, targets education and long-term behavior change. Symbolic AI models facilitate explanations as they are able to offer logical proofs of inferences (or recommendations) from which explanations can be generated. We implemented a modular framework called XAIN (eXplanations for AI in Notation3) to explain symbolic reasoning inferences in a trace-based, contrastive, and counterfactual way. We applied this framework to explain recommendations for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients to avoid flare-ups. For evaluation, we propose a questionnaire that captures understanding, persuasion, education, and behavior change, together with traditional XAI metrics including fidelity (soundness, completeness) and interpretability (parsimony, clarity).
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 71
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A symbolic approximate reasoning
    El-Sayed, M
    Pacholczyk, D
    ROUGH SETS, FUZZY SETS, DATA MINING, AND GRANULAR COMPUTING, 2003, 2639 : 368 - 373
  • [12] Symbolic Reasoning for Hearthstone
    Stiegler, Andreas
    Dahal, Keshav P.
    Maucher, Johannes
    Livingstone, Daniel
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GAMES, 2018, 10 (02) : 113 - 127
  • [13] VARIETIES OF SYMBOLIC REASONING
    BLOCK, RA
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1985, 23 (04) : 277 - 277
  • [14] DESIGN REASONING WITHOUT EXPLANATIONS
    COYNE, RD
    AI MAGAZINE, 1990, 11 (04) : 72 - 80
  • [15] Visual Explanations of Probabilistic Reasoning
    Erwig, Martin
    Walkingshaw, Eric
    2009 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON VISUAL LANGUAGES AND HUMAN-CENTRIC COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 23 - 27
  • [16] Integrating Symbolic and Sub-symbolic Reasoning
    Strannegard, Claes
    Nizamani, Abdul Rahim
    ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCE (AGI 2016), 2016, 9782 : 171 - 180
  • [17] Strategic reasoning in persuasion games: An experiment
    Li, Ying Xue
    Schipper, Burkhard C.
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2020, 121 : 329 - 367
  • [18] Cultural styles of reasoning and the process of persuasion
    Davis, ME
    Nisbett, R
    Schwartz, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 230 - 230
  • [19] SYMBOLIC ACTION IN INDIA - GANDHIS NONVERBAL PERSUASION
    MERRIAM, AH
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF SPEECH, 1975, 61 (03) : 290 - 306
  • [20] A perceptual account of symbolic reasoning
    Landy, David
    Allen, Colin
    Zednik, Carlos
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5