Symbolic Reasoning for Hearthstone

被引:8
|
作者
Stiegler, Andreas [1 ]
Dahal, Keshav P. [2 ,3 ]
Maucher, Johannes [1 ]
Livingstone, Daniel [4 ]
机构
[1] Stuttgart Media Univ, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ West Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, Renfrew, Scotland
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Glasgow Sch Art, Glasgow G3 6RQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Context awareness; expert systems; inference mechanisms; knowledge based systems; knowledge representation; Monte Carlo methods; IMPERFECT INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1109/TCIAIG.2017.2706745
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Trading-card games are an interesting problem domain for Game AI, as they feature some challenges, such as highly variable game mechanics, that are not encountered in this intensity in many other genres. We present an expert system forming a player-level AI for the digital trading-card game Hearthstone. The bot uses a symbolic approach with a semantic structure, acting as an ontology, to represent both static descriptions of the game mechanics and dynamic game-state memories. Methods are introduced to reduce the amount of expert knowledge, such as popular moves or strategies, represented in the ontology, as the bot should derive such decisions in a symbolic way from its knowledge base. We narrow down the problem domain, selecting the relevant aspects for a play-to-win bot approach and comparing an ontology-driven approach to other approaches such as machine learning and case-based reasoning. On this basis, we describe how the semantic structure is linked with the game-state and how different aspects, such as memories, are encoded. An example illustrates how the bot, at runtime, uses rules and queries on the semantic structure combined with a simple utility system to do reasoning and strategic planning. Finally, an evaluation is presented that was conducted by fielding the bot against the stock "Expert" AI that Hearthstone is shipped with, as well as human opponents of various skill levels in order to assess how well the bot plays. A pseudo Turing test was used to evaluate the believability of the bot's reasoning.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 127
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SYMBOLIC REASONING
    YAZDANI, M
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 1989, 3 (2-3) : 79 - 79
  • [2] A symbolic approximate reasoning
    El-Sayed, M
    Pacholczyk, D
    ROUGH SETS, FUZZY SETS, DATA MINING, AND GRANULAR COMPUTING, 2003, 2639 : 368 - 373
  • [3] VARIETIES OF SYMBOLIC REASONING
    BLOCK, RA
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1985, 23 (04) : 277 - 277
  • [4] Integrating Symbolic and Sub-symbolic Reasoning
    Strannegard, Claes
    Nizamani, Abdul Rahim
    ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCE (AGI 2016), 2016, 9782 : 171 - 180
  • [5] 'Hearthstone'
    McCully, Chris
    POETRY WALES, 2007, 42 (03): : 69 - 71
  • [6] A perceptual account of symbolic reasoning
    Landy, David
    Allen, Colin
    Zednik, Carlos
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [7] KNOWLEDGE, SYMBOLIC REASONING AND PERCEPTION
    CROWLEY, JL
    INTELLIGENT AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS 2, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1989, : 501 - 515
  • [8] SHAPE EMERGENCE BY SYMBOLIC REASONING
    GERO, JS
    YAN, M
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 1994, 21 (02): : 191 - 212
  • [9] SYMBOLIC REASONING IN OBJECT EXTRACTION
    MEISELS, A
    MINTZ, D
    COMPUTER VISION GRAPHICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, 1990, 52 (03): : 447 - 459
  • [10] A symbolic approach to syllogistic reasoning
    Khayata, MY
    Pacholczyk, D
    TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONSTRUCTING INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS 1: TASKS, 2002, 89 : 99 - 112