Symbolic Reasoning for Hearthstone

被引:8
|
作者
Stiegler, Andreas [1 ]
Dahal, Keshav P. [2 ,3 ]
Maucher, Johannes [1 ]
Livingstone, Daniel [4 ]
机构
[1] Stuttgart Media Univ, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ West Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, Renfrew, Scotland
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Glasgow Sch Art, Glasgow G3 6RQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Context awareness; expert systems; inference mechanisms; knowledge based systems; knowledge representation; Monte Carlo methods; IMPERFECT INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1109/TCIAIG.2017.2706745
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Trading-card games are an interesting problem domain for Game AI, as they feature some challenges, such as highly variable game mechanics, that are not encountered in this intensity in many other genres. We present an expert system forming a player-level AI for the digital trading-card game Hearthstone. The bot uses a symbolic approach with a semantic structure, acting as an ontology, to represent both static descriptions of the game mechanics and dynamic game-state memories. Methods are introduced to reduce the amount of expert knowledge, such as popular moves or strategies, represented in the ontology, as the bot should derive such decisions in a symbolic way from its knowledge base. We narrow down the problem domain, selecting the relevant aspects for a play-to-win bot approach and comparing an ontology-driven approach to other approaches such as machine learning and case-based reasoning. On this basis, we describe how the semantic structure is linked with the game-state and how different aspects, such as memories, are encoded. An example illustrates how the bot, at runtime, uses rules and queries on the semantic structure combined with a simple utility system to do reasoning and strategic planning. Finally, an evaluation is presented that was conducted by fielding the bot against the stock "Expert" AI that Hearthstone is shipped with, as well as human opponents of various skill levels in order to assess how well the bot plays. A pseudo Turing test was used to evaluate the believability of the bot's reasoning.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 127
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neural-symbolic intuitionistic reasoning
    Garcez, ASD
    Lamb, LC
    Gabbay, DM
    DESIGN AND APPLICATION OF HYBRID INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2003, 104 : 399 - 408
  • [22] Reasoning with numeric and symbolic time information
    Mouhoub, M
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2004, 21 (01) : 25 - 56
  • [23] Rethinking Pointer Reasoning in Symbolic Execution
    Coppa, Emilio
    D'Elia, Daniele Cono
    Demetrescu, Camil
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 32ND IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ASE'17), 2017, : 613 - 618
  • [24] MATHEMATICAL REASONING AND EXTERNAL SYMBOLIC SYSTEMS
    Novaes, Catarina Dutilh
    LOGIQUE ET ANALYSE, 2013, (221) : 45 - 65
  • [25] Symbolic Representation and Reasoning for Rectangles with Superposition
    Konishi, Takako
    Takahashi, Kazuko
    DBKDA 2011: THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN DATABASES, KNOWLEDGE, AND DATA APPLICATIONS, 2011, : 71 - 76
  • [26] SPATIAL REASONING USING SYMBOLIC ARRAYS
    PAPADIAS, D
    SELLIS, T
    LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1992, 639 : 153 - 161
  • [27] SYMBOLIC REASONING IN CONFORMATIONAL-ANALYSIS
    DOLATA, DP
    PROUT, CK
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 193 : 12 - COMP
  • [28] A symbolic approximate reasoning under fuzziness
    El-Sayed, M
    Pacholczyk, D
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS - IFSA 2003, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2715 : 685 - 693
  • [29] Structures for symbolic mathematical reasoning and computation
    Homann, K
    Calmet, J
    DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SYMBOLIC COMPUTATION SYSTEMS, 1996, 1128 : 216 - 227
  • [30] LOGICAL REASONING IN SYMBOLIC NEURAL NETWORKS
    DECALLATAY, A
    IFIP TRANSACTIONS A-COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 19 : 327 - 334