Explanations of Symbolic Reasoning to Effect Patient Persuasion and Education

被引:0
|
作者
Van Woensel, William [1 ]
Scioscia, Floriano [2 ]
Loseto, Giuseppe [3 ]
Seneviratne, Oshani [4 ]
Patton, Evan [5 ]
Abidi, Samina [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, 55 Laurier E, Ottawa, ON K1N6N5, Canada
[2] Polytechn Univ Bari, I-70125 Bari, BA, Italy
[3] LUM Giuseppe Degennaro Univ, I-70010 Casamassima, BA, Italy
[4] Rensselaer Polytechn Inst, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[5] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02143 USA
[6] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax, NS B3H4R2, Canada
关键词
Explainable Decision Support; Patient Self-Management; Semantic Web; LINKED DATA;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-54303-6_7
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Artificial Intelligence (AI) models can issue smart, contextsensitive recommendations to help patients self-manage their illnesses, including medication regimens, dietary habits, physical activity, and avoiding flare-ups. Instead of merely positing an "edict," the AI model can also explain why the recommendation was issued: why one should stay indoors (e.g., increased risk of flare-ups), why further calorie intake should be avoided (e.g., met the daily limit), or why the care provider should be contacted (e.g., prescription change). The goal of these explanations is to achieve understanding and persuasion effects, which, in turn, targets education and long-term behavior change. Symbolic AI models facilitate explanations as they are able to offer logical proofs of inferences (or recommendations) from which explanations can be generated. We implemented a modular framework called XAIN (eXplanations for AI in Notation3) to explain symbolic reasoning inferences in a trace-based, contrastive, and counterfactual way. We applied this framework to explain recommendations for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients to avoid flare-ups. For evaluation, we propose a questionnaire that captures understanding, persuasion, education, and behavior change, together with traditional XAI metrics including fidelity (soundness, completeness) and interpretability (parsimony, clarity).
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 71
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] KNOWLEDGE, SYMBOLIC REASONING AND PERCEPTION
    CROWLEY, JL
    INTELLIGENT AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS 2, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1989, : 501 - 515
  • [22] Reasoning ability -: structure and possible explanations
    Wilhelm, O
    Sander, N
    Schulze, R
    Süss, HM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 409 - 409
  • [23] Persuasive explanations for path reasoning recommendations
    Noughabi, Havva Alizadeh
    Behkamal, Behshid
    Zarrinkalam, Fattane
    Kahani, Mohsen
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024, : 413 - 439
  • [24] Some strategies for explanations in evidential reasoning
    Xu, H
    Smets, P
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1996, 26 (05): : 599 - 607
  • [25] Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning
    Falappa, MA
    Kern-Isberner, G
    Simari, GR
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 141 (1-2) : 1 - 28
  • [26] SHAPE EMERGENCE BY SYMBOLIC REASONING
    GERO, JS
    YAN, M
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 1994, 21 (02): : 191 - 212
  • [27] SYMBOLIC REASONING IN OBJECT EXTRACTION
    MEISELS, A
    MINTZ, D
    COMPUTER VISION GRAPHICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, 1990, 52 (03): : 447 - 459
  • [28] A symbolic approach to syllogistic reasoning
    Khayata, MY
    Pacholczyk, D
    TECHNOLOGIES FOR CONSTRUCTING INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS 1: TASKS, 2002, 89 : 99 - 112
  • [29] The Utility of Virtual Patient Simulations for Clinical Reasoning Education
    Watari, Takashi
    Tokuda, Yasuharu
    Owada, Meiko
    Onigata, Kazumichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (15) : 1 - 9
  • [30] Hybrid reasoning in knowledge graphs: Combing symbolic reasoning and statistical reasoning
    Li, Weizhuo
    Qi, Guilin
    Ji, Qiu
    SEMANTIC WEB, 2020, 11 (01) : 53 - 62