Effectiveness of strategies to increase adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Danieli, Inaki M. Dopazo [1 ]
Robles, Manuel [1 ]
Bellando, Maria Belen [1 ]
Picardi, Gonzalo [1 ]
Schenfeld, Yamila [1 ]
Bruzzone, Ariana [2 ]
Esandi, Maria Eugenia [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl del Sur, Dept Ciencias Salud, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Inst Invest Bioquim Bahia Blanca INIBIBB, Lab Biol Canc, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] Univ Nacl del Sul, Dept Econ, San Andres 800, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Univ Nacl Sur, Dept Econ, San Andres 800, RA-8000 Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
colorectal cancer; screening; strategies; interventions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Coverage for colorectal cancer screening in Argentina is very low. The objective of this review is to assess and synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of strategies aimed at increasing adherence to colorectal cancer screening among healthcare personnel and the general population at average risk. Methods: A review of systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluated the effectiveness of these strategies was conducted. Searches were performed in electronic databases, meta -search engines, the Cochrane Library, and through manual searching. Eligibility and inclusion criteria were applied, with assessment of the quality of the SRs using AMSTAR II and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Thematic synthesis was conducted based on the taxonomy of strategies proposed by Dougherty (patient/community-targeted, professionaltargeted, and other types of strategies). Results: A total of 635 studies were identified, with 36 deemed eligible and 11 excluded due to insufficient quality, resulting in the inclusion of 10 SRs. A multiplicity of strategies with varying effectiveness were identified, with the majority targeting the population. Among these, education, self -testing with specimen collection at specific locations, and reminders stood out. For professionals, only education and reminders showed effectiveness. Combined strategies demonstrated greater effectiveness than isolated strategies. Conclusions: There is more evidence on strategies targeting the population than professionals. Combined strategies showed greater effectiveness, highlighting the need to explore barriers in both the population and professionals in each specific context in order to prioritize and combine those that have proven effective and would have a greater impact.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 304
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review
    Dressler, J.
    Johnsen, A. T.
    Madsen, L. J.
    Rasmussen, M.
    Jorgensen, L. N.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 190 : 67 - 74
  • [32] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY COLONOGRAPHY IN COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Hanly, Paul
    Skally, Mairead
    Fenlon, Helen
    Sharp, Linda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2012, 28 (04) : 415 - 423
  • [33] A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake
    Tinmouth, Jill
    Ritvo, Paul
    McGregor, S. Elizabeth
    Claus, Danielle
    Pasut, George
    Myers, Ronald E.
    Guglietti, Crissa
    Paszat, Lawrence F.
    Hilsden, Robert J.
    Rabeneck, Linda
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2011, 57 (01) : E7 - E15
  • [34] Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review
    Wools, A.
    Dapper, E. A.
    de Leeuw, J. R. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 26 (01): : 158 - 168
  • [35] Variation in estimates of cost-effectiveness for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening: A systematic review
    Marshall, JK
    Marshall, DA
    Brazier, N
    O'Brien, BJ
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (04) : A620 - A620
  • [36] Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults: Systematic Review
    Villamizar, Licet
    Albis, Rosario
    Abadia, Mario
    Oliveros, Ricardo
    Gamboa, Oscar
    Alba, Luz
    Bernal, Luis
    Wiesner, Carolina
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CANCEROLOGIA, 2010, 14 (03): : 152 - 168
  • [37] Quantifying the impact of adherence to screening strategies on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality
    D'Andrea, Elvira
    Ahnen, Dennis J.
    Sussman, Daniel A.
    Najafzadeh, Mehdi
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (02): : 824 - 836
  • [38] Adherence to Competing Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening Over 3 Years
    Liang, Peter S.
    Wheat, Chelle L.
    Abhat, Anshu
    Brenner, Alison T.
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Hayward, Rodney A.
    Thomas, Jennifer P.
    Vijan, Sandeep
    Inadomi, John M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 (01): : 105 - 114
  • [39] Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening A Randomized Clinical Trial of Competing Strategies
    Inadomi, John M.
    Vijan, Sandeep
    Janz, Nancy K.
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Thomas, Jennifer P.
    Lin, Yunghui V.
    Munoz, Roxana
    Lau, Chim
    Somsouk, Ma
    El-Nachef, Najwa
    Hayward, Rodney A.
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 172 (07) : 575 - 582
  • [40] Interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening adherence in low-income settings within the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rubin, Lily
    Okitondo, Christian
    Haines, Lauren
    Ebell, Mark
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 172