Effectiveness of strategies to increase adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Danieli, Inaki M. Dopazo [1 ]
Robles, Manuel [1 ]
Bellando, Maria Belen [1 ]
Picardi, Gonzalo [1 ]
Schenfeld, Yamila [1 ]
Bruzzone, Ariana [2 ]
Esandi, Maria Eugenia [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl del Sur, Dept Ciencias Salud, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Inst Invest Bioquim Bahia Blanca INIBIBB, Lab Biol Canc, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] Univ Nacl del Sul, Dept Econ, San Andres 800, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Univ Nacl Sur, Dept Econ, San Andres 800, RA-8000 Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
colorectal cancer; screening; strategies; interventions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Coverage for colorectal cancer screening in Argentina is very low. The objective of this review is to assess and synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of strategies aimed at increasing adherence to colorectal cancer screening among healthcare personnel and the general population at average risk. Methods: A review of systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluated the effectiveness of these strategies was conducted. Searches were performed in electronic databases, meta -search engines, the Cochrane Library, and through manual searching. Eligibility and inclusion criteria were applied, with assessment of the quality of the SRs using AMSTAR II and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Thematic synthesis was conducted based on the taxonomy of strategies proposed by Dougherty (patient/community-targeted, professionaltargeted, and other types of strategies). Results: A total of 635 studies were identified, with 36 deemed eligible and 11 excluded due to insufficient quality, resulting in the inclusion of 10 SRs. A multiplicity of strategies with varying effectiveness were identified, with the majority targeting the population. Among these, education, self -testing with specimen collection at specific locations, and reminders stood out. For professionals, only education and reminders showed effectiveness. Combined strategies demonstrated greater effectiveness than isolated strategies. Conclusions: There is more evidence on strategies targeting the population than professionals. Combined strategies showed greater effectiveness, highlighting the need to explore barriers in both the population and professionals in each specific context in order to prioritize and combine those that have proven effective and would have a greater impact.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 304
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accuracy and long-term effectiveness of established screening modalities and strategies in colorectal cancer screening: An umbrella review
    Zhang, Yuelun
    Song, Kai
    Zhou, Yueyang
    Chen, Yuqing
    Cheng, Xinran
    Dai, Min
    Wu, Dong
    Chen, Hongda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2025,
  • [42] Effectiveness of reminder strategies on cancer screening adherence: a randomised controlled trial
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Ching, Jessica Y. L.
    Huang, Junjie
    Wong, John C. T.
    Lam, Thomas Y. T.
    Chan, Victor C. W.
    Ng, Simpson K. c
    Hui, Zero
    Luk, Arthur K. C.
    Wu, Justin C. Y.
    Chan, Francis K. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 68 (674): : E604 - E611
  • [43] Bridging the Gap: Interventions to Increase Cancer Screening Adherence in Individuals with Mental Disorders-A Systematic Review
    Lombardo, Paolo
    Mussetto, Ilaria
    Baccolini, Valentina
    Di Rosa, Enrico
    Sinopoli, Alessandra
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2025, 15 (01)
  • [44] Effectiveness of Telemedicine Strategies for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Systematic Review
    Coronado, Andrea
    Singh, Hargurinder
    Costella, John
    Malvankar, Monali
    Xie, Bin
    Hodge, William
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [45] Recruitment strategies and interventions to increase participation in lung cancer screening programmes: a systematic review protocol
    Djuric, Olivera
    Venturelli, Francesco
    Bassi, Maria Chiara
    Gorini, Giuseppe
    Paci, Eugenio
    Mantellini, Paola
    Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [46] Effectiveness of care transition strategies for colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Trindade, Leticia Flores
    Boell, Julia Estela Willrich
    Lorenzini, Elisiane
    Montanez, Wilson Canon
    Malkiewiez, Michelle
    Pituskin, Edith
    Kolankiewicz, Adriane Cristina Bernat
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (07) : 6251 - 6261
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness of risk-tailored screening strategy for colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Wang, Le
    Liu, Chengcheng
    Wang, Youqing
    Du, Lingbin
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 37 (07) : 1235 - 1243
  • [48] Cost effectiveness of fecal DNA screening for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and quality appraisal of the literature
    Skally M.
    Hanly P.
    Sharp L.
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2013, 11 (3) : 181 - 192
  • [49] Effectiveness of care transition strategies for colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Letícia Flores Trindade
    Julia Estela Willrich Boell
    Elisiane Lorenzini
    Wilson Cañon Montañez
    Michelle Malkiewiez
    Edith Pituskin
    Adriane Cristina Bernat Kolankiewicz
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 6251 - 6261
  • [50] SCREENING INTERVAL FOR COLONOSCOPIC SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF INTERVAL CANCER RATES OF COLONOSCOPIC SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL CANCER
    Hamashima, C.
    Abe, K.
    Terasawa, T.
    Katayama, T.
    Hoshi, K.
    Hosono, S.
    Sasaki, S.
    Tadano, T.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S180 - S180