Interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening adherence in low-income settings within the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Rubin, Lily [1 ,2 ]
Okitondo, Christian [1 ,4 ]
Haines, Lauren [3 ]
Ebell, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 101 Buck Rd, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Augusta Univ, Med Coll Georgia, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, 1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] 224 BS Miller Hall,Hlth Sci Campus,101 Buck Rd, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Screening; Low-income; Mailed outreach; Patient navigation; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMMUNITY-HEALTH CENTERS; PATIENT DECISION AID; USUAL CARE; OUTREACH; POPULATION; NAVIGATION; PROGRAM; RATES; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107522
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The USPS Task Force recommends screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in adults aged 45-75. Screening rates are low in underserved populations. We conducted a systematic review of interventions to increase CRC screening adherence in low-income settings in US. We included randomized control trials of CRC screening in-terventions conducted in low-income settings in the US. Outcome was CRC screening adherence. Random-effects meta-analysis of relative risks was conducted for the effectiveness of CRC screening interventions. We identified 46 studies that met inclusion criteria. Interventions were grouped into four categories: mailed outreach, patient navigation, patient education, and types of reminders. Mailed outreach with enclosed fecal immunohisto-chemical test (FIT) (RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.74, 2.78), guaiac based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) (RR 4.34, 95% CI 1.29, 14.67), and without FIT/gFOBT (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.15, 2.82) all significantly increased CRC screening, as did non-individualized education (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.07, 1.94) and patient navigation (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.29, 2.02). Mailed outreach with an incentive (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.81, 1.16) and individualized education (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.83, 1.38) did not significantly improve screening adherence. Telephone reminders are slightly more effective than reminder letters (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02, 1.33), but there is no difference between personal or automated phone calls (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.74, 1.84). Mailed outreach and patient navigation are the most effective strategies to improve colorectal cancer screening in low-income populations. There was significant heterogeneity between studies, likely due to differences in intervention design, screening tests, and follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dougherty, Michael K.
    Brenner, Alison T.
    Crockett, Seth D.
    Gupta, Shivani
    Wheeler, Stephanie B.
    Coker-Schwimmer, Manny
    Cubillos, Laura
    Malo, Teri
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (12) : 1645 - 1658
  • [2] Care Cascades for Hypertension in Low-Income Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lamloum, Demetrio
    Fassio, Federico
    Osetinsky, Brianna
    Tediosi, Fabrizio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 68
  • [3] Interventions to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tin, Khaing Nwe
    Ngamjarus, Chetta
    Rattanakanokchai, Siwanon
    Sothornwit, Jen
    Aue-aungkul, Apiwat
    Paing, Aye Kyawt
    Pattanittum, Porjai
    Jampathong, Nampet
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [4] Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers Among Minorities in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Keihanian, Tara
    Sussman, Daniel A.
    Tamariz, Leonardo J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S943 - S943
  • [5] Interventions to increase the uptake of cervical cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khaing Nwe Tin
    Chetta Ngamjarus
    Siwanon Rattanakanokchai
    Jen Sothornwit
    Apiwat Aue-aungkul
    Aye Kyawt Paing
    Porjai Pattanittum
    Nampet Jampathong
    Pisake Lumbiganon
    BMC Women's Health, 23
  • [6] Adherence to colonoscopy in cascade screening of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Weimiao
    Huang, Junjie
    Yang, Yihui
    Gu, Kai
    Luu, Hung N.
    Tan, Songsong
    Yang, Chen
    Fu, Jiongxing
    Bao, Pingping
    Ying, Tao
    Withers, Mellissa
    Mao, Dandan
    Chen, Sikun
    Gong, Yangming
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Xu, Wanghong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 37 (04) : 620 - 631
  • [7] Promoting colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of interventions to increase uptake
    Tsipa, Anastasia
    O'Connor, Daryl B.
    Branley-Bell, Dawn
    Day, Fiona
    Hall, Louise H.
    Sykes-Muskett, Bianca
    Wilding, Sarah
    Taylor, Natalie
    Conner, Mark
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 15 (03) : 371 - 394
  • [8] Packaging interventions to increase medication adherence: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Conn, Vicki S.
    Ruppar, Todd M.
    Chan, Keith C.
    Dunbar-Jacob, Jacqueline
    Pepper, Ginette A.
    De Geest, Sabina
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2015, 31 (01) : 145 - 160
  • [9] The effects of depressive symptom management interventions on low-income mothers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Kisook
    Lee, Yoonyoung
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2019, 75 (06) : 1173 - 1187
  • [10] Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna
    Ali, Muhammad Usman
    Warren, Rachel
    Kenny, Meghan
    Sherifali, Diana
    Raina, Parminder
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2016, 15 (04) : 298 - 313