Interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening adherence in low-income settings within the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Rubin, Lily [1 ,2 ]
Okitondo, Christian [1 ,4 ]
Haines, Lauren [3 ]
Ebell, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 101 Buck Rd, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Augusta Univ, Med Coll Georgia, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, 1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] 224 BS Miller Hall,Hlth Sci Campus,101 Buck Rd, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Screening; Low-income; Mailed outreach; Patient navigation; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMMUNITY-HEALTH CENTERS; PATIENT DECISION AID; USUAL CARE; OUTREACH; POPULATION; NAVIGATION; PROGRAM; RATES; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107522
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The USPS Task Force recommends screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in adults aged 45-75. Screening rates are low in underserved populations. We conducted a systematic review of interventions to increase CRC screening adherence in low-income settings in US. We included randomized control trials of CRC screening in-terventions conducted in low-income settings in the US. Outcome was CRC screening adherence. Random-effects meta-analysis of relative risks was conducted for the effectiveness of CRC screening interventions. We identified 46 studies that met inclusion criteria. Interventions were grouped into four categories: mailed outreach, patient navigation, patient education, and types of reminders. Mailed outreach with enclosed fecal immunohisto-chemical test (FIT) (RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.74, 2.78), guaiac based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) (RR 4.34, 95% CI 1.29, 14.67), and without FIT/gFOBT (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.15, 2.82) all significantly increased CRC screening, as did non-individualized education (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.07, 1.94) and patient navigation (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.29, 2.02). Mailed outreach with an incentive (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.81, 1.16) and individualized education (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.83, 1.38) did not significantly improve screening adherence. Telephone reminders are slightly more effective than reminder letters (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02, 1.33), but there is no difference between personal or automated phone calls (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.74, 1.84). Mailed outreach and patient navigation are the most effective strategies to improve colorectal cancer screening in low-income populations. There was significant heterogeneity between studies, likely due to differences in intervention design, screening tests, and follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A systematic review of clinic and community intervention to increase fecal testing for colorectal cancer in rural and low-income populations in the United States – How, what and when?
    Melinda M. Davis
    Michele Freeman
    Jackilen Shannon
    Gloria D. Coronado
    Kurt C. Stange
    Jeanne-Marie Guise
    Stephanie B. Wheeler
    David I. Buckley
    BMC Cancer, 18
  • [22] A systematic review of clinic and community intervention to increase fecal testing for colorectal cancer in rural and low-income populations in the United States - How, what and when?
    Davis, Melinda M.
    Freeman, Michele
    Shannon, Jackilen
    Coronado, Gloria D.
    Stange, Kurt C.
    Guise, Jeanne-Marie
    Wheeler, Stephanie B.
    Buckley, David I.
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [23] Colorectal cancer knowledge and screening adherence among low-income Hispanic employees
    Ou, Judy Y.
    Warner, Echo L.
    Nam, Gina E.
    Martel, Laura
    Carbajal-Salisbury, Sara
    Fuentes, Vicky
    Wetter, David W.
    Kirchhoff, Anne C.
    Kepka, Deanna
    HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2019, 34 (04) : 400 - 414
  • [24] ADHERENCE INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE ADHERENCE TO ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY IN LOW INCOME SETTINGS: AN INDIVIDUAL PATIENT DATA NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
    Mills, E. J.
    Nachega, J.
    Lester, R.
    Thorlund, K.
    Ioannidis, J.
    Linnemayr, S.
    Gross, R.
    Calderone, Y.
    Amico, R.
    Thirumurthy, H.
    Pearson, C.
    Remien, R.
    Mbuagbaw, L.
    Thabane, L.
    Chung, M.
    Wilson, I
    Liu, A.
    Uthman, O.
    Ford, N.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A361 - A361
  • [25] Acceptance of Opt-Out HIV Screening in Outpatient Settings in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gebrezgi, Merhawi T.
    Mauck, Daniel E.
    Sheehan, Diana M.
    Fennie, Kristopher P.
    Cyrus, Elena
    Degarege, Abraham
    Trepka, Mary Jo
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2019, 134 (05) : 484 - 492
  • [26] Effectiveness of strategies to increase adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review
    Danieli, Inaki M. Dopazo
    Robles, Manuel
    Bellando, Maria Belen
    Picardi, Gonzalo
    Schenfeld, Yamila
    Bruzzone, Ariana
    Esandi, Maria Eugenia
    MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, 2024, 84 (02) : 289 - 304
  • [27] Rapid diagnostic test for antenatal syphilis screening in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Romero Casas, Carmen Phang
    James, Marrissa Martyn-St
    Hamilton, Jean
    Marinho, Daniel S.
    Castro, Rodolfo
    Harnan, Sue
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (02):
  • [28] Collaboration to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Low-Income Uninsured Patients
    Redwood, Diana
    Holman, Larry
    Zandman-Zeman, Sharon
    Hunt, Tom
    Besh, Leah
    Katinszky, Wanda
    PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2011, 8 (03):
  • [29] INTERVENTIONS FOR SMOKING CESSATION IN HEALTH SETTINGS IN LOW AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS STUDY
    Toan Thanh Do
    Huang, Erick Wan-Chun
    Anh Thu Nguyen
    Minh Ngoc Luu
    Thanh Hai Pham
    Fox, Greg
    RESPIROLOGY, 2019, 24 : 94 - 94
  • [30] Disability and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ricciardi, Giovanni Emanuele
    Cuciniello, Rita
    De Ponti, Emanuele
    Lunetti, Carlo
    Pennisi, Flavia
    Signorelli, Carlo
    Renzi, Cristina
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (11) : 7023 - 7039