Interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening adherence in low-income settings within the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Rubin, Lily [1 ,2 ]
Okitondo, Christian [1 ,4 ]
Haines, Lauren [3 ]
Ebell, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 101 Buck Rd, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Augusta Univ, Med Coll Georgia, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, 1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] 224 BS Miller Hall,Hlth Sci Campus,101 Buck Rd, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Screening; Low-income; Mailed outreach; Patient navigation; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMMUNITY-HEALTH CENTERS; PATIENT DECISION AID; USUAL CARE; OUTREACH; POPULATION; NAVIGATION; PROGRAM; RATES; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107522
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The USPS Task Force recommends screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in adults aged 45-75. Screening rates are low in underserved populations. We conducted a systematic review of interventions to increase CRC screening adherence in low-income settings in US. We included randomized control trials of CRC screening in-terventions conducted in low-income settings in the US. Outcome was CRC screening adherence. Random-effects meta-analysis of relative risks was conducted for the effectiveness of CRC screening interventions. We identified 46 studies that met inclusion criteria. Interventions were grouped into four categories: mailed outreach, patient navigation, patient education, and types of reminders. Mailed outreach with enclosed fecal immunohisto-chemical test (FIT) (RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.74, 2.78), guaiac based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) (RR 4.34, 95% CI 1.29, 14.67), and without FIT/gFOBT (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.15, 2.82) all significantly increased CRC screening, as did non-individualized education (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.07, 1.94) and patient navigation (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.29, 2.02). Mailed outreach with an incentive (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.81, 1.16) and individualized education (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.83, 1.38) did not significantly improve screening adherence. Telephone reminders are slightly more effective than reminder letters (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02, 1.33), but there is no difference between personal or automated phone calls (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.74, 1.84). Mailed outreach and patient navigation are the most effective strategies to improve colorectal cancer screening in low-income populations. There was significant heterogeneity between studies, likely due to differences in intervention design, screening tests, and follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Racial Disparities in Screening Mammography in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ahmed, Ahmed T.
    Welch, Brian T.
    Brinjikji, Waked
    Farah, Wigdan H.
    Henrichsen, Tara L.
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Knudsen, John M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (02) : 157 - 165
  • [42] Patient Adherence to Screening for Lung Cancer in the US A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lopez-Olivo, Maria A.
    Maki, Kristin G.
    Choi, Noah J.
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Shih, Ya-Chen Tina
    Lowenstein, Lisa M.
    Hicklen, Rachel S.
    Volk, Robert J.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (11) : E2025102
  • [43] Prevalence of chronic pain in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jackson, Tracy
    Thomas, Sarah
    Stabile, Victoria
    Han, Xue
    Shotwell, Matthew
    McQueen, Kelly
    LANCET, 2015, 385 : 10 - 10
  • [44] Perioperative mortality rates in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ng-Kamstra, Joshua S.
    Arya, Sumedha
    Greenberg, Sarah L. M.
    Kotagal, Meera
    Arsenault, Catherine
    Ljungman, David
    Yorlets, Rachel R.
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Frankfurter, Claudia
    Nikouline, Anton
    Lai, Francis Yi Xing
    Palmqvist, Charlotta L.
    Fu, Terence
    Mahmood, Tahrin
    Raju, Sneha
    Sharma, Sristi
    Marks, Isobel H.
    Bowder, Alexis
    Pi, Lebei
    Meara, John G.
    Shrime, Mark G.
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 3 (03):
  • [45] Are behavioral economics interventions effective in increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake: A systematic review of evidence and meta-analysis?
    Ahadinezhad, Bahman
    Maleki, Aisa
    Akhondi, Amirali
    Kazemi, Mohammadjavad
    Yousefy, Sama
    Rezaei, Fatemeh
    Khosravizadeh, Omid
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (02):
  • [46] Electronic Health Interventions and Cervical Cancer Screening:Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Xiaoxia
    Ning, Lianzhen
    Fan, Wenqi
    Jia, Chanyi
    Ge, Lina
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [47] Interventions for cancer screening among Chinese Americans: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lei, Fang
    Zheng, Ying
    Lee, Eunice
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03):
  • [48] Treatment-related mortality in children with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ehrlich, Bella S.
    Mcneil, Michael J.
    Pham, Linh T. D.
    Chen, Yichen
    Rivera, Jocelyn
    Acuna, Carlos
    Sniderman, Liz
    Sakaan, Firas M.
    Aceituno, Alejandra Mendez
    Villegas, Cesar A.
    Force, Lisa M.
    Bolous, Nancy S.
    Wiphatphumiprates, Parima P.
    Slone, Jeremy S.
    Carrillo, Angela K.
    Gillipelli, Srinithya R.
    Duffy, Caitlyn
    Arias, Anita, V
    Devidas, Meenakshi
    Rodriguez-Galindo, Carlos
    Mukkada, Sheena
    Agulnik, Asya
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2023, 24 (09): : 967 - 977
  • [49] Interventions to increase mammography screening uptake among women living in low-income and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review
    Nduka, Ifeoma Jovita
    Ejie, Izuchukwu Loveth
    Okafor, Charles Ebuka
    Eleje, George Uchenna
    Ekwunife, Obinna Ikechukwu
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (03): : e056901
  • [50] A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to increase stroke thrombolysis
    McDermott, Mollie
    Skolarus, Lesli E.
    Burke, James F.
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)