Sedation for Colonoscopy Procedures Using Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol-Fentanyl Infusions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Seyam, Sameh Hamdy [1 ]
Aboelsuod, Mohamed Abdelgawad Abdelhalim [1 ]
Ahmed, Ismail Mohamed Abdelgawad [1 ]
Hassan, Abdallah Elabd [1 ]
机构
[1] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Management, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Colonoscopy; dexmedetomidine; outpatient sedation; perioperative care; propofol; sedation;
D O I
10.4274/TJAR.2024.231485
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: Different anaesthetists for sedation or monitored anaesthesia care have been used for colonoscopy. The target of this research was the ability to perform colonoscopy under a painless degree of sedation and the prevalence of undesired proceedings. Methods: A total of 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group D received dexmedetomidine and Group PF received propofol-fentanyl. Patients in both groups received the same infusion ratio. The minimum infusion amount of dexmetatomidine is (0.1 to 0.4 mu g kg -1 h -1 ) in Group D, whereas fentanyl is administered at a rate of 0.01 to 0.05 mu g kg -1 min -1 in the PF group during the approximately 45 -min colonoscopy. Results: Group D exhibited significantly lower modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores at intraoperative time points T1 -T12. Group D also exhibited significantly lower visual analog scale scores for pain at intraoperative time points T4 and T7. The mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in Group D at intraoperative times T6 -T8 and T11 -T12, as well as upon admission to the post -anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and 30 min after admission to the PACU. The results of the ANOVA tests revealed a significantly lower heart rate in Group D. The respiratory rate exhibited a notable decrease during time intervals T8 and T10 in the PF group. Conclusion: The administration of dexmetatomidine and propofol-fentanyl during colonoscopy was found to be safe. In addition, dexmetatomidine may present significant benefits in this context because of its lower occurrence of adverse respiratory events.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 67
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol during shockwave lithotripsy: A Randomized controlled trial
    Kaygusuz, Kenan
    Gokce, Gokhan
    Gursoy, Sinan
    Ayan, Semih
    Mimaroglu, Caner
    Gultekin, Yener
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (01): : 114 - 119
  • [42] Discharge Readiness after Propofol with or without Dexmedetomidine for Colonoscopy A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Edokpolo, Leonard U.
    Mastriano, Daniel J.
    Serafin, Joanna
    Weedon, Jeremy C.
    Siddiqui, Maryam T.
    Dimaculangan, Dennis P.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 131 (02) : 279 - 286
  • [43] Satisfaction and safety using dexmedetomidine or propofol sedation during endoscopic oesophageal procedures A randomised controlled trial
    Eberl, Susanne
    Preckel, Benedikt
    Bergman, Jacques J.
    van Dieren, Susan
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (09) : 631 - 637
  • [44] Randomized clinical trial of Entonox® versus midazolam-fentanyl sedation for colonoscopy
    Maslekar, S.
    Gardiner, A.
    Hughes, M.
    Culbert, B.
    Duthie, G. S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (04) : 361 - 368
  • [45] A Randomized controlled trial on procedural sedation among adult patients in emergency departments: Comparing fentanyl with midazolam versus fentanyl with propofol
    Ab-Rahman, N. H.
    Hashim, A.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 51 (04) : 479 - 480
  • [46] RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL ON SEDATION FOR ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURES: KETAMINE VERSUS PROPOFOL
    Quintano, A.
    Vallejo, A.
    Fernandez-Miret, B.
    Cabanez, S.
    Castano, S.
    Manzano, A.
    Corral, E.
    Maynar, J.
    Fonseca, E.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 38 : S36 - S36
  • [47] Intravenous Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine Versus Ketamine-Propofol for Procedural Sedation in Adults Undergoing Short Surgical Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kakarla, Anusha
    Senapati, Laxman K.
    Das, Asima
    Acharya, Mousumi
    Sukanya, Sailaja
    Pradhan, Amit
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [48] Sedative and analgesic effects of propofol-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl for emergency department procedures
    Tajoddini, Shahrad
    Motaghi, Mojdeh
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 29 (04) : 212 - 219
  • [49] Sedation for Short Hemato-Oncologic Invasive Procedures in Children: Comparison of Propofol-Remifentanil and Propofol-Fentanyl
    Ince, Icten E.
    Iyilikci, Leyla
    Yilmaz, Sebnem
    Gunes, Dilek
    Akkus, Muhammed
    Isguven, Duyguhan
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2013, 35 (02) : 112 - 117
  • [50] Patient-controlled-sedation using propofol and alfentanil during colonoscopy: A prospective randomised controlled trial.
    Roseveare, C
    Patel, P
    Seavell, C
    Criswell, J
    Kimble, J
    Shepherd, HA
    GUT, 1998, 42 : A59 - A59