Sedation for Colonoscopy Procedures Using Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol-Fentanyl Infusions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Seyam, Sameh Hamdy [1 ]
Aboelsuod, Mohamed Abdelgawad Abdelhalim [1 ]
Ahmed, Ismail Mohamed Abdelgawad [1 ]
Hassan, Abdallah Elabd [1 ]
机构
[1] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Management, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Colonoscopy; dexmedetomidine; outpatient sedation; perioperative care; propofol; sedation;
D O I
10.4274/TJAR.2024.231485
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: Different anaesthetists for sedation or monitored anaesthesia care have been used for colonoscopy. The target of this research was the ability to perform colonoscopy under a painless degree of sedation and the prevalence of undesired proceedings. Methods: A total of 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group D received dexmedetomidine and Group PF received propofol-fentanyl. Patients in both groups received the same infusion ratio. The minimum infusion amount of dexmetatomidine is (0.1 to 0.4 mu g kg -1 h -1 ) in Group D, whereas fentanyl is administered at a rate of 0.01 to 0.05 mu g kg -1 min -1 in the PF group during the approximately 45 -min colonoscopy. Results: Group D exhibited significantly lower modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores at intraoperative time points T1 -T12. Group D also exhibited significantly lower visual analog scale scores for pain at intraoperative time points T4 and T7. The mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in Group D at intraoperative times T6 -T8 and T11 -T12, as well as upon admission to the post -anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and 30 min after admission to the PACU. The results of the ANOVA tests revealed a significantly lower heart rate in Group D. The respiratory rate exhibited a notable decrease during time intervals T8 and T10 in the PF group. Conclusion: The administration of dexmetatomidine and propofol-fentanyl during colonoscopy was found to be safe. In addition, dexmetatomidine may present significant benefits in this context because of its lower occurrence of adverse respiratory events.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 67
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl combinations for sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized clinical trial
    Falcao, Milena Vasconcelos
    Neto, Joao Nogueira
    Moura, Ed Carlos Rey
    Oliveira, Caio Marcio Barros
    Diniz, Rodrigo Pinto
    Dibai-Filho, Almir Vieira
    Leal, Plinio da Cunha
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 75 (01):
  • [32] Patient-controlled sedation versus intravenous sedation for colonoscopy in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Lee, DWH
    Chan, ACW
    Sze, TS
    Ko, CW
    Poon, CM
    Chan, KC
    Sin, KS
    Chung, SCS
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (05) : 629 - 632
  • [33] Dexmedetomidine vs propofol-remifentanil conscious sedation for awake craniotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Goettel, N.
    Bharadwaj, S.
    Venkatraghavan, L.
    Mehta, J.
    Bernstein, M.
    Manninen, P. H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 116 (06) : 811 - 821
  • [34] Etomidate versus propofol sedation for complex upper endoscopic procedures: a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Mi Gang
    Park, Se Woo
    Kim, Jae Hyun
    Lee, Jin
    Kae, Sea Hyub
    Jang, Hyun Joo
    Koh, Dong Hee
    Choi, Min Ho
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 86 (03) : 452 - 461
  • [35] A randomized controlled double blind trial of patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy with propofol/remifentanil vs. midazolam/fentanyl
    Mandel, Jeff E.
    Tanner, Jonathan
    Lichtenstein, Gary R.
    Metz, David C.
    Katzka, David A.
    Ginsberg, Gregory
    Kochman, Michael L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (09): : S520 - S521
  • [36] Midazolam and pethidine versus propofol and fentanyl patient controlled sedation/analgesia for upper gastrointestinal tract ultrasound endoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Agostoni, M.
    Fanti, L.
    Arcidiacono, P. G.
    Gemma, M.
    Strini, G.
    Torri, G.
    Testoni, P. A.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (11) : 1024 - 1029
  • [37] Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol Sedation Improves Sublingual Microcirculation After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Liu, Xu
    Zhang, Kai
    Wang, Wei
    Xie, Guohao
    Cheng, Baoli
    Wang, Yan
    Hu, Yaoqin
    Fang, Xiangming
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2016, 30 (06) : 1509 - 1515
  • [38] Less respiratory depression with patient versus anesthesiologist controlled sedation: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy using propofol-remifentanil
    Mandel, Jeff
    Lichtenstein, Gary
    Metz, David
    Ginsberg, Gregory
    Kochman, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 : S518 - S518
  • [39] Efficacy of Bispectral Index Monitoring During Balanced Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Yeon Hwa Yu
    Dong Soo Han
    Hyun Soo Kim
    Eun Kyung Kim
    Chang Soo Eun
    Kyo-Sang Yoo
    Woo Jong Shin
    Seungho Ryu
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2013, 58 : 3576 - 3583
  • [40] Efficacy of Bispectral Index Monitoring During Balanced Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Yu, Yeon Hwa
    Han, Dong Soo
    Kim, Hyun Soo
    Kim, Eun Kyung
    Eun, Chang Soo
    Yoo, Kyo-Sang
    Shin, Woo Jong
    Ryu, Seungho
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2013, 58 (12) : 3576 - 3583