Sedation for Colonoscopy Procedures Using Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol-Fentanyl Infusions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Seyam, Sameh Hamdy [1 ]
Aboelsuod, Mohamed Abdelgawad Abdelhalim [1 ]
Ahmed, Ismail Mohamed Abdelgawad [1 ]
Hassan, Abdallah Elabd [1 ]
机构
[1] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Management, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Colonoscopy; dexmedetomidine; outpatient sedation; perioperative care; propofol; sedation;
D O I
10.4274/TJAR.2024.231485
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: Different anaesthetists for sedation or monitored anaesthesia care have been used for colonoscopy. The target of this research was the ability to perform colonoscopy under a painless degree of sedation and the prevalence of undesired proceedings. Methods: A total of 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group D received dexmedetomidine and Group PF received propofol-fentanyl. Patients in both groups received the same infusion ratio. The minimum infusion amount of dexmetatomidine is (0.1 to 0.4 mu g kg -1 h -1 ) in Group D, whereas fentanyl is administered at a rate of 0.01 to 0.05 mu g kg -1 min -1 in the PF group during the approximately 45 -min colonoscopy. Results: Group D exhibited significantly lower modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores at intraoperative time points T1 -T12. Group D also exhibited significantly lower visual analog scale scores for pain at intraoperative time points T4 and T7. The mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in Group D at intraoperative times T6 -T8 and T11 -T12, as well as upon admission to the post -anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and 30 min after admission to the PACU. The results of the ANOVA tests revealed a significantly lower heart rate in Group D. The respiratory rate exhibited a notable decrease during time intervals T8 and T10 in the PF group. Conclusion: The administration of dexmetatomidine and propofol-fentanyl during colonoscopy was found to be safe. In addition, dexmetatomidine may present significant benefits in this context because of its lower occurrence of adverse respiratory events.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 67
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sedation During EGD in Cirrhotic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Propofol and Fentanyl Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl
    Correia, Lucianna M.
    Queiroz, Danielle
    Lenz, Luciano
    Tafarel, Jean
    Gomes, Gustavo F.
    Martins, Fernanda P.
    Nakao, Frank S.
    Rodrigues, Rodrigo A.
    Rohr, Maria Rachel S.
    Ferrari, Angelo P.
    Libera, Ermelindo D.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB211 - AB211
  • [22] Patient-controlled versus nurse-administered sedation with propofol during colonoscopy. A prospective randomized trial
    Heuss, LT
    Drewe, J
    Schnieper, P
    Tapparelli, CB
    Pflimlin, E
    Beglinger, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (03): : 511 - 518
  • [23] Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol-ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in patients with trauma
    Aminiahidashti, Hamed
    Shafiee, Sajad
    Hosseininejad, Seyed Mohammad
    Firouzian, Abulfazl
    Barzegarnejad, Ayyub
    Kiasari, Alieh Zamani
    Kerigh, Behzad Feizzadeh
    Bozorgi, Farzad
    Shafizad, Misagh
    Geraeeli, Ahmad
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (10): : 1766 - 1770
  • [24] Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol Sedation Reduces Delirium after Cardiac Surgery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Djaiani, George
    Silverton, Natalie
    Fedorko, Ludwik
    Carroll, Jo
    Styra, Rima
    Rao, Vivek
    Katznelson, Rita
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 124 (02) : 362 - 368
  • [25] Comparison of propofol-nalbuphine and propofol-fentanyl sedation for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Peiqi
    Chen, Yan
    Guo, Ying
    Cao, Jiangbei
    Wang, Hong
    Mi, Weidong
    Xu, Longhe
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [26] Comparison of propofol-nalbuphine and propofol-fentanyl sedation for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Peiqi Wang
    Yan Chen
    Ying Guo
    Jiangbei Cao
    Hong Wang
    Weidong Mi
    Longhe Xu
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [27] Nonanesthesiologist-Administered Propofol Versus Midazolam and Propofol, Titrated to Moderate Sedation, for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Molina-Infante, Javier
    Duenas-Sadornil, Carmen
    Mateos-Rodriguez, Jose M.
    Perez-Gallardo, Belen
    Vinagre-Rodriguez, Gema
    Hernandez-Alonso, Moises
    Fernandez-Bermejo, Miguel
    Gonzalez-Huix, Ferran
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2012, 57 (09) : 2385 - 2393
  • [28] Nonanesthesiologist-Administered Propofol Versus Midazolam and Propofol, Titrated to Moderate Sedation, for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Javier Molina-Infante
    Carmen Dueñas-Sadornil
    Jose M. Mateos-Rodriguez
    Belen Perez-Gallardo
    Gema Vinagre-Rodríguez
    Moises Hernandez-Alonso
    Miguel Fernandez-Bermejo
    Ferran Gonzalez-Huix
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2012, 57 : 2385 - 2393
  • [29] Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine/Ketamine with Propofol/Fentanyl for Sedation in Colonoscopy Patients: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
    Aminnejad, Reza
    Hormati, Ahmad
    Shafiee, Hamed
    Alemi, Faezeh
    Hormati, Maryam
    Saeidi, Mohammad
    Ahmadpour, Sajjad
    Sabouri, Seyed Mahdi
    Aghaali, Mohammad
    CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS, 2022, 21 (08) : 724 - 731
  • [30] Clinical Efficacy Between Intravenous Paracetamol and Intravenous Fentanyl for Propofol Deep Sedation in Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Thiparporn, Thanitthi
    Supan, Wilaiporn
    Amornyotin, Somchai
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2025, 19 : 471 - 478