Deformable anthropomorphic pelvis phantom for dose accumulation verification

被引:1
|
作者
Wong, Yun Ming [1 ]
Koh, Calvin Wei Yang [2 ,7 ]
Lew, Kah Seng [1 ,2 ]
Chua, Clifford Ghee Ann [2 ,7 ]
Yeap, Ping Lin [2 ,4 ]
Zhang, Ee Teng [5 ,6 ]
Ong, Ashley Li Kuan [2 ,7 ]
Tuan, Jeffrey Kit Loong [2 ,7 ]
Ng, Bing Feng [5 ]
Lew, Wen Siang [1 ]
Lee, James Cheow Lei [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Hong Qi [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Div Phys & Appl Phys, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Div Radiat Oncol, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Duke NUS Med Sch, Oncol Acad Clin Programme, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Oncol, Cambridge, England
[5] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Nanyang, Singapore
[6] Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore Ctr Printing 3D, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Lab Ai3, Singapore, Singapore
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2024年 / 69卷 / 12期
关键词
deformable image registration; adaptive radiotherapy; dice similarity coefficient; target registration error; dose accumulation; 3D printing; deformable anthropomorphic phantom; ADAPTIVE RADIOTHERAPY; IMAGE REGISTRATION; PROSTATE MOTION; INTRAFRACTION MOTION; RADIATION-THERAPY; VALIDATION; ACCURACY; EXPERIENCE; FRAMEWORK; MARGINS;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ad52e4
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. The validation of deformable image registration (DIR) for contour propagation is often done using contour-based metrics. Meanwhile, dose accumulation requires evaluation of voxel mapping accuracy, which might not be accurately represented by contour-based metrics. By fabricating a deformable anthropomorphic pelvis phantom, we aim to (1) quantify the voxel mapping accuracy for various deformation scenarios, in high- and low-contrast regions, and (2) identify any correlation between dice similarity coefficient (DSC), a commonly used contour-based metric, and the voxel mapping accuracy for each organ. Approach. Four organs, i.e. pelvic bone, prostate, bladder and rectum (PBR), were 3D printed using PLA and a Polyjet digital material, and assembled. The latter three were implanted with glass bead and CT markers within or on their surfaces. Four deformation scenarios were simulated by varying the bladder and rectum volumes. For each scenario, nine DIRs with different parameters were performed on RayStation v10B. The voxel mapping accuracy was quantified by finding the discrepancy between true and mapped marker positions, termed the target registration error (TRE). Pearson correlation test was done between the DSC and mean TRE for each organ. Main results. For the first time, we fabricated a deformable phantom purely from 3D printing, which successfully reproduced realistic anatomical deformations. Overall, the voxel mapping accuracy dropped with increasing deformation magnitude, but improved when more organs were used to guide the DIR or limit the registration region. DSC was found to be a good indicator of voxel mapping accuracy for prostate and rectum, but a comparatively poorer one for bladder. DSC > 0.85/0.90 was established as the threshold of mean TRE > 0.3 cm for rectum/prostate. For bladder, extra metrics in addition to DSC should be considered. Significance. This work presented a 3D printed phantom, which enabled quantification of voxel mapping accuracy and evaluation of correlation between DSC and voxel mapping accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] End-to-end test for fractionated online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy using a deformable anthropomorphic pelvis phantom
    Elter, A.
    Rippke, C.
    Johnen, W.
    Mann, P.
    Hellwich, E.
    Schwahofer, A.
    Dorsch, S.
    Buchele, C.
    Klueter, S.
    Karger, C. P.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (24):
  • [22] Commissioning a New Anthropomorphic Spine and Lung Phantom to Be Used for Remote Dose Verification of Spine Radiosurgery
    Caruthers, D.
    Ibbott, G.
    Followill, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [23] End-to-end empirical validation of 3D dose distributions using an anthropomorphic pelvis phantom
    Marot, M.
    Elter, A.
    Mann, P.
    Schwahofer, A.
    Lang, C.
    Johnen, W.
    Koerber, S. A.
    Beuthien-Baumann, B.
    Gillmann, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S747 - S747
  • [24] Development of a Deformable Dosimetric Phantom for Verification of 4D Dose Calculation Algorithms
    Zhong, H.
    Glide-Hurst, C.
    Li, H.
    Nurushev, T.
    Movsas, B.
    Chetty, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3956 - 3956
  • [25] CALCULATED DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS IN AN ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOM
    SCHERPELZ, RI
    TANNER, JE
    BRACKENBUSH, LW
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1987, 52 : S68 - S69
  • [26] Motion-induced proton dose change measured by 3D deformable dosimeters in an anthropomorphic phantom
    Jensen, S.
    Ehrbar, S.
    Worm, E.
    Muren, L.
    Tanadini-Lang, S.
    Petersen, J.
    Balling, P.
    Poulsen, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S387 - S389
  • [27] Benchmarking of an Anthropomorphic Deformable Abdominal Phantom for Image Guided Radiotherapy Validation
    Matrosic, C.
    Culberson, W.
    Bednarz, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E117 - E117
  • [28] Anthropomorphic phantom for deformable lung and liver CT and MR imaging for radiotherapy
    Colvill, Emma
    Krieger, Miriam
    Bosshard, Patrick
    Steinacher, Patrice
    Schnidrig, Benno Andreas Rohrer
    Parkel, Thomas
    Stergiou, Ioannis
    Zhang, Ye
    Peroni, Marta
    Safai, Sairos
    Weber, Damien Charles
    Lomax, Antony
    Fattori, Giovanni
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (07):
  • [29] Development of a Deformable Anthropomorphic Liver Phantom for Multimodal Imaging With Ultrasound and CT
    Konovalov, M. E.
    Klimov, D. D.
    Poduraev, Y. V.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 7 (08) : 871 - 878
  • [30] Dose Accumulation Studies with a Dynamic Physical Anthropomorphic Phantom and An External Surrogate-Based Motion Model
    Hurwitz, M.
    Rottmann, J.
    Williams, C.
    Dhou, S.
    Wagar, M.
    Mannarino, E.
    Seco, J.
    Lewis, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 210 - 210