Pasture recovery, emissions, and the Brazilian Paris agreement commitments

被引:2
|
作者
Gianetti, Giovani William [1 ]
Ferreira, Joaquim Bento de Souza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Ave Padua Dias 11, BR-13418900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
关键词
Paris agreement; Greenhouse gases; Low carbon agriculture; Soil organic carbon; Computable general equilibrium; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LAND-USE CHANGE; SOIL CARBON STOCKS; BEEF-PRODUCTION; AMAZON FOREST; MANAGEMENT; DEFORESTATION; SYSTEMS; INTENSIFICATION; INSTALLATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107118
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the socioeconomic, land use change, and greenhouse gases emissions impacts of degraded pastures recovery (DPR) in Brazil, assessing the contribution to the Brazilian Paris Agreement commitments. We used a Computable General Equilibrium model, TERM-BR15, in a scenario simulation for the period 2015-2035. The simulation includes DPR shocks of productivity, investments, and Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) fixation. We used two carbon accounting methods for the impacts on emissions, the original method of Brazil's emissions inventory, which does not consider SOC, and the alternative method, which includes SOC fixation. Results show a 0.56% growth in Gross Domestic Product and 0.73% in real household consumption relative to the 2035 baseline. There would be a social return of R$80.5 billion (in 2023 prices), representing R$8.27 for every real invested. Less developed and more dependent on cattle ranching regions would benefit the most. Cattle ranching would expand production using less area, resulting in a land-saving effect of 1.15 million hectares in 2035. GHG emissions would increase by 7.83% in the original accounting method, resulting from herd and economic growth. In the alternative method, 0.23% mitigation would occur, showing that SOC fixation can more than offset the economic activity growth. Independently of the GHG accounting method Brazil would achieve the 2025 mitigation target of 37% relative to 2005 but would not meet the 50% mitigation target of 2030. SOC fixation could contribute up to 5.7% of the 2030 mitigation target. Our results show that DPR is a sustainable production system that increases economic growth, avoids deforestation, and could mitigate GHG emissions. We provide information on regional impacts suitable for better decision-making for pasture restoration incentives in Brazil.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Africa and the Paris Agreement
    Andries C. Kruger
    Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8 : 365 - 366
  • [42] Japan and the Paris Agreement
    Yoshida, Osamu
    JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2017, 10 (01) : 269 - 271
  • [43] From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting 'science-based' emission targets
    Bjorn, Anders
    Lloyd, Shannon
    Matthews, Damon
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (05)
  • [44] Crop-pasture rotation: A strategy to reduce soil greenhouse gas emissions in the Brazilian Cerrado
    Nunes Carvalho, Joao Luis
    Raucci, Guilherme Silva
    Frazao, Leidivan Almeida
    Cerri, Carlos Eduardo P.
    Bernoux, Martial
    Cerri, Carlos Clemente
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 183 : 167 - 175
  • [45] How the European Union reaches the target of CO2 emissions under the Paris Agreement
    Teng, Xiangyu
    Lu, Liang Chun
    Chiu, Yung-Ho
    EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2020, 28 (09) : 1836 - 1857
  • [46] Extending Near-Term Emissions Scenarios to Assess Warming Implications of Paris Agreement NDCs
    Guetschow, Johannes
    Jeffery, Mairi Louise
    Schaeffer, Michiel
    Hare, Bill
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2018, 6 (09) : 1242 - 1259
  • [47] The relationship between net GHG emissions and radiative forcing with an application to Article 4.1 of the Paris Agreement
    Tom M. L. Wigley
    Climatic Change, 2021, 169
  • [48] The relationship between net GHG emissions and radiative forcing with an application to Article 4.1 of the Paris Agreement
    Wigley, Tom M. L.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2021, 169 (1-2)
  • [49] First, do no harm? An overview and ethical evaluation of South Africa's climate change mitigation commitments in light of the Paris Agreement
    Steenkamp, Lee-Ann
    Naude, Piet
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 12 (02) : 70 - 84
  • [50] Brazilian artists in Paris
    Maertens, M
    OEIL-MAGAZINE INTERNATIONAL D ART, 1999, (504): : 24 - 24