Pasture recovery, emissions, and the Brazilian Paris agreement commitments

被引:2
|
作者
Gianetti, Giovani William [1 ]
Ferreira, Joaquim Bento de Souza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Ave Padua Dias 11, BR-13418900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
关键词
Paris agreement; Greenhouse gases; Low carbon agriculture; Soil organic carbon; Computable general equilibrium; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LAND-USE CHANGE; SOIL CARBON STOCKS; BEEF-PRODUCTION; AMAZON FOREST; MANAGEMENT; DEFORESTATION; SYSTEMS; INTENSIFICATION; INSTALLATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107118
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the socioeconomic, land use change, and greenhouse gases emissions impacts of degraded pastures recovery (DPR) in Brazil, assessing the contribution to the Brazilian Paris Agreement commitments. We used a Computable General Equilibrium model, TERM-BR15, in a scenario simulation for the period 2015-2035. The simulation includes DPR shocks of productivity, investments, and Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) fixation. We used two carbon accounting methods for the impacts on emissions, the original method of Brazil's emissions inventory, which does not consider SOC, and the alternative method, which includes SOC fixation. Results show a 0.56% growth in Gross Domestic Product and 0.73% in real household consumption relative to the 2035 baseline. There would be a social return of R$80.5 billion (in 2023 prices), representing R$8.27 for every real invested. Less developed and more dependent on cattle ranching regions would benefit the most. Cattle ranching would expand production using less area, resulting in a land-saving effect of 1.15 million hectares in 2035. GHG emissions would increase by 7.83% in the original accounting method, resulting from herd and economic growth. In the alternative method, 0.23% mitigation would occur, showing that SOC fixation can more than offset the economic activity growth. Independently of the GHG accounting method Brazil would achieve the 2025 mitigation target of 37% relative to 2005 but would not meet the 50% mitigation target of 2030. SOC fixation could contribute up to 5.7% of the 2030 mitigation target. Our results show that DPR is a sustainable production system that increases economic growth, avoids deforestation, and could mitigate GHG emissions. We provide information on regional impacts suitable for better decision-making for pasture restoration incentives in Brazil.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impacts of COVID-19 and fiscal stimuli on global emissions and the Paris Agreement
    Shan, Yuli
    Ou, Jiamin
    Wang, Daoping
    Zeng, Zhao
    Zhang, Shaohui
    Guan, Dabo
    Hubacek, Klaus
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2021, 11 (03) : 200 - 206
  • [32] Paris Agreement, Precautionary Principle and Human Rights: Zero Emissions in Two Decades?
    Ekardt, Felix
    Wieding, Jutta
    Zorn, Anika
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [33] The Implications of the Paris Agreement for the Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from International Shipping
    Shi, Yubing
    OCEAN YEARBOOK, 2018, 32 (01): : 528 - 555
  • [34] Renewable energy in reducing greenhouse gas emissions: Reaching the goals of the Paris agreement in Brazil
    Lima, M. A.
    Mendes, L. F. R.
    Mothe, G. A.
    Linhares, F. G.
    de Castro, M. P. P.
    da Silva, M. G.
    Sthel, M. S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 33
  • [35] Energy supply transformation pathways in Iran to reduce GHG emissions in line with the Paris Agreement
    Ghadaksaz, Hesam
    Saboohi, Yadollah
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2020, 32
  • [36] The Paris Agreement Scam
    Foran, John
    NATION, 2016, 302 (06) : 2 - +
  • [37] Building on the Paris Agreement
    Lozowski, Dorothy
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 123 (12) : 5 - 5
  • [38] Paris agreement lives on
    Matacic, Catherine
    SCIENCE, 2018, 362 (6421) : 1334 - 1334
  • [39] Cities and the Paris Agreement
    Coolidge, Kelsey
    IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT ON CLIMATE CHANGE, 2019, : 263 - 282
  • [40] After the Paris Agreement
    Arcos-Vargas, Angel
    DYNA, 2017, 92 (01): : 12 - 14