Pasture recovery, emissions, and the Brazilian Paris agreement commitments

被引:2
|
作者
Gianetti, Giovani William [1 ]
Ferreira, Joaquim Bento de Souza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Ave Padua Dias 11, BR-13418900 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
关键词
Paris agreement; Greenhouse gases; Low carbon agriculture; Soil organic carbon; Computable general equilibrium; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LAND-USE CHANGE; SOIL CARBON STOCKS; BEEF-PRODUCTION; AMAZON FOREST; MANAGEMENT; DEFORESTATION; SYSTEMS; INTENSIFICATION; INSTALLATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107118
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the socioeconomic, land use change, and greenhouse gases emissions impacts of degraded pastures recovery (DPR) in Brazil, assessing the contribution to the Brazilian Paris Agreement commitments. We used a Computable General Equilibrium model, TERM-BR15, in a scenario simulation for the period 2015-2035. The simulation includes DPR shocks of productivity, investments, and Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) fixation. We used two carbon accounting methods for the impacts on emissions, the original method of Brazil's emissions inventory, which does not consider SOC, and the alternative method, which includes SOC fixation. Results show a 0.56% growth in Gross Domestic Product and 0.73% in real household consumption relative to the 2035 baseline. There would be a social return of R$80.5 billion (in 2023 prices), representing R$8.27 for every real invested. Less developed and more dependent on cattle ranching regions would benefit the most. Cattle ranching would expand production using less area, resulting in a land-saving effect of 1.15 million hectares in 2035. GHG emissions would increase by 7.83% in the original accounting method, resulting from herd and economic growth. In the alternative method, 0.23% mitigation would occur, showing that SOC fixation can more than offset the economic activity growth. Independently of the GHG accounting method Brazil would achieve the 2025 mitigation target of 37% relative to 2005 but would not meet the 50% mitigation target of 2030. SOC fixation could contribute up to 5.7% of the 2030 mitigation target. Our results show that DPR is a sustainable production system that increases economic growth, avoids deforestation, and could mitigate GHG emissions. We provide information on regional impacts suitable for better decision-making for pasture restoration incentives in Brazil.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Warming assessment of the bottom-up Paris Agreement emissions pledges
    Yann Robiou du Pont
    Malte Meinshausen
    Nature Communications, 9
  • [22] The impact of policy and model uncertainties on emissions projections of the Paris Agreement pledges
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    Dafnomilis, Ioannis
    Hof, Andries F.
    Olsson, Marika
    Beusen, Arthur
    Botzen, W. J. Wouter
    Kuramochi, Takeshi
    Nascimento, Leonardo
    Rogelj, Joeri
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 18 (05)
  • [23] Agreement, Disputes and Commitments in Dialogue
    Lascarides, Alex
    Asher, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF SEMANTICS, 2009, 26 (02) : 109 - 158
  • [24] Drivers of Bilateral Climate Finance Aid: The Roles of Paris Agreement Commitments, Public Governance, and Multilateral Institutions
    Han, Xuehui
    Cheng, Yuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2023, 85 (3-4): : 783 - 821
  • [25] An appraisal of the measures taken by the Indian Government to attain sustainable development goals and to meet the commitments of the Paris Agreement
    Sharma, Neeraj
    Parameswaran, Krishnasamy
    PASSAGENS-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL HISTORY AND LEGAL CULTURE, 2023, 15 (02): : 301 - 318
  • [26] Drivers of Bilateral Climate Finance Aid: The Roles of Paris Agreement Commitments, Public Governance, and Multilateral Institutions
    Xuehui Han
    Yuan Cheng
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2023, 85 : 783 - 821
  • [27] THE ROLE OF NATIONAL FRAMEWORK LEGISLATION IN IMPLEMENTING AUSTRALIA'S EMISSION REDUCTION COMMITMENTS UNDER THE PARIS AGREEMENT
    Bennett, Michael
    UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA LAW REVIEW, 2018, 43 (01): : 240 - 263
  • [28] International commitments and domestic opinion: the effect of the Paris Agreement on public support for policies to address climate change
    Tingley, Dustin
    Tomz, Michael
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2020, 29 (07) : 1135 - 1156
  • [29] The Paris agreement: charting a low-emissions path for a child born today
    Howard, Courtney
    Tcholakov, Yassen
    Holz, Ceecee
    LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2020, 4 (01): : E4 - E6
  • [30] Impacts of COVID-19 and fiscal stimuli on global emissions and the Paris Agreement
    Yuli Shan
    Jiamin Ou
    Daoping Wang
    Zhao Zeng
    Shaohui Zhang
    Dabo Guan
    Klaus Hubacek
    Nature Climate Change, 2021, 11 : 200 - 206