A Comparative Study on Methods used in Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Plant

被引:1
|
作者
Das, U. [1 ]
Nandi, C. [1 ]
De, D. [1 ]
Das, S. [1 ]
Nandi, S. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tripura Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Agartala 799022, Tripura, India
关键词
life cycle assessment; fuel transportation; coal power plant; life cycle impacts calculation method; greenhouse gases; ReCiPe midpoint (H) method; CML 2001 (Baseline) method; GENERATION; CAPTURE; CCS; LCA;
D O I
10.1134/S0040601524700083
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Coal, a fossil fuel, has been one of the most prominent sources of energy throughout the globe. Alongside its many blessings of being a reliable energy source, it has some curses, including global warming and air, water pollution, and environmental impacts. Born from ancient flora, decaying through epochs past, carbon-laden, fuelling eons in a vast contrast. Anthracite, bituminous, a trove of diverse grades, a worldwide energy titan, but with environmental shades. This study explores into the intricate impacts of coal-fired power plants, navigating the intersection of energy demand, environmental responsibility, and the historical legacy of this carbon-rich resource. In doing so, it employs the "cradle-to-gate" method of life cycle assessments (LCA), a well-researched approach that scrutinizes the entire life cycle of coal-fired power generation. During all three stages, fuel extraction, fuel transportation, and plant operation, basic hotspots of pollution are identified and their adverse effects on the environment are looked into. An analysis of a 530 MW power plant in China has been considered. This report uses both CML (Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden) 2001 (Baseline) and ReCiPe Midpoint (H) analyses to conduct a detailed comparative examination of the environmental implications of the plant's operation in addition to only the electricity generation. Climate change, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, acidification potential, marine aquatic ecotoxicity, etc are some of the hazards identified during the study. A better scientific approach following standard guidance and efficient management can help to mitigate the pollution caused. The article presents the results of studies of the diverse impact of coal generation on the environment and discusses the most environmentally friendly methods of using this type of fuel to generate electricity.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 630
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cleaner production assessment of coal-fired power plant based on DEA
    Zeng, Shao-lun
    Wang, Wei
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE POWER GENERATION AND SUPPLY, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 2060 - 2063
  • [42] Repowering a small coal-fired power plant
    Miell, Rick
    POWER ENGINEERING, 2007, 111 (11) : 24 - 24
  • [43] 1600 megawatt coal-fired power plant
    不详
    BAUINGENIEUR, 2009, 84 : A14 - A14
  • [44] Court blocks coal-fired power plant
    不详
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2008, 86 (27) : 19 - 19
  • [45] Performance evaluation of a coal-fired power plant
    Sharma, A.Kr. (avdhesh_sharma35@yahoo.co.in), 1600, RAMS Consultants (09):
  • [46] Coal-fired power plant tour notes
    Yoshida, Yoshiaki
    Journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, 2023, 143 (01):
  • [47] EVALUATION OF COAL-FIRED, FLUID BED COMBINED CYCLE POWER-PLANT
    GIRAMONTI, AJ
    HORGAN, JJ
    SMITH, JW
    HUBER, DA
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1978, 175 (MAR): : 21 - 21
  • [48] Exergoeconomic analysis of a Kalina cycle coupled coal-fired steam power plant
    Singh, Omendra Kumar
    Kaushik, S. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2014, 14 (01) : 38 - 59
  • [49] Study on extracting alumina from coal ashes in the coal-fired power plant
    Tang, Yun
    Chen, Fu-Lin
    Liu, An-Rong
    Meitan Xuebao/Journal of the China Coal Society, 2009, 34 (01): : 105 - 110
  • [50] Integrating geothermal into coal-fired power plant with carbon capture: A comparative study with solar energy
    Wang, Fu
    Deng, Shuai
    Zhao, Jun
    Zhao, Jiapei
    Yang, Guohua
    Yan, Jinyue
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 148 : 569 - 582