A Comparative Study on Methods used in Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Plant

被引:1
|
作者
Das, U. [1 ]
Nandi, C. [1 ]
De, D. [1 ]
Das, S. [1 ]
Nandi, S. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tripura Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Agartala 799022, Tripura, India
关键词
life cycle assessment; fuel transportation; coal power plant; life cycle impacts calculation method; greenhouse gases; ReCiPe midpoint (H) method; CML 2001 (Baseline) method; GENERATION; CAPTURE; CCS; LCA;
D O I
10.1134/S0040601524700083
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Coal, a fossil fuel, has been one of the most prominent sources of energy throughout the globe. Alongside its many blessings of being a reliable energy source, it has some curses, including global warming and air, water pollution, and environmental impacts. Born from ancient flora, decaying through epochs past, carbon-laden, fuelling eons in a vast contrast. Anthracite, bituminous, a trove of diverse grades, a worldwide energy titan, but with environmental shades. This study explores into the intricate impacts of coal-fired power plants, navigating the intersection of energy demand, environmental responsibility, and the historical legacy of this carbon-rich resource. In doing so, it employs the "cradle-to-gate" method of life cycle assessments (LCA), a well-researched approach that scrutinizes the entire life cycle of coal-fired power generation. During all three stages, fuel extraction, fuel transportation, and plant operation, basic hotspots of pollution are identified and their adverse effects on the environment are looked into. An analysis of a 530 MW power plant in China has been considered. This report uses both CML (Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden) 2001 (Baseline) and ReCiPe Midpoint (H) analyses to conduct a detailed comparative examination of the environmental implications of the plant's operation in addition to only the electricity generation. Climate change, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, acidification potential, marine aquatic ecotoxicity, etc are some of the hazards identified during the study. A better scientific approach following standard guidance and efficient management can help to mitigate the pollution caused. The article presents the results of studies of the diverse impact of coal generation on the environment and discusses the most environmentally friendly methods of using this type of fuel to generate electricity.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 630
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life-cycle-based water footprint assessment of coal-fired power generation in China
    Zhu, Yongnan
    Jiang, Shan
    Zhao, Yong
    Li, Haihong
    He, Guohua
    Li, Lei
    Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 254
  • [22] Comparative analysis of optimisation methods applied to thermal cycle of a coal fired power plant
    Kowalczyk, Lukasz
    Elsner, Witold
    ARCHIVES OF THERMODYNAMICS, 2013, 34 (04) : 175 - 186
  • [23] Life cycle assessment on oxygen-enriched combustion of coal-fired power generation units
    Chen, Chun-Xiang
    Ma, Xiao-Qian
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2009, 29 (SUPPL. 1): : 82 - 87
  • [24] National water use of coal-fired power generation: Hybrid life cycle assessment in China
    Yuan, Jia-Hai
    Peng, Ke-Xin
    Xu, Hui-Ming
    Zhao, Chang-Hong
    Zhang, Hao-Nan
    ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (05) : 948 - 962
  • [25] VOC emissions of coal-fired power plants in China based on life cycle assessment method
    Peng, Ya
    Yang, Qing
    Wang, Liang
    Wang, Shuo
    Li, Junting
    Zhang, Xiong
    Zhang, Shihong
    Zhao, Haibo
    Zhang, Bo
    Wang, Changqing
    Bartocci, Pietro
    Fantozzi, Francesco
    FUEL, 2021, 292
  • [26] Life cycle assessment of solar aided coal-fired power system with and without heat storage
    Zhai, Rongrong
    Li, Chao
    Chen, Ying
    Yang, Yongping
    Patchigolla, Kumar
    Oakey, John E.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 111 : 453 - 465
  • [27] Life Cycle Inventory of Clean Coal-Fired Power Generation in China
    Xiao, Bin
    Suo, Chenxia
    Yan, Xiaofei
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT (EBM2011), VOLS 1-6, 2011, : 3014 - 3017
  • [28] Comparative exergoeconomic assessment of coal-fired power plants - Binary Rankine cycle versus conventional steam cycle
    Hofmann, Mathias
    Tsatsaronis, George
    ENERGY, 2018, 142 : 168 - 179
  • [29] Impact categories through life cycle assessment of coal-fired brick
    Kumar, Sunil C. P.
    Parvathi, S.
    Rudramoorthy, R.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TRENDS IN ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICETEST - 2015), 2016, 24 : 531 - 537
  • [30] Water footprint comparison of a naphtha-fired combined cycle power plant and a coal-fired steam power plant
    Arpit, Sankalp
    Das, Prasanta Kumar
    Dash, Sukanta Kumar
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 194 (06)