A Comparative Study on Methods used in Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Plant

被引:1
|
作者
Das, U. [1 ]
Nandi, C. [1 ]
De, D. [1 ]
Das, S. [1 ]
Nandi, S. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tripura Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Agartala 799022, Tripura, India
关键词
life cycle assessment; fuel transportation; coal power plant; life cycle impacts calculation method; greenhouse gases; ReCiPe midpoint (H) method; CML 2001 (Baseline) method; GENERATION; CAPTURE; CCS; LCA;
D O I
10.1134/S0040601524700083
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Coal, a fossil fuel, has been one of the most prominent sources of energy throughout the globe. Alongside its many blessings of being a reliable energy source, it has some curses, including global warming and air, water pollution, and environmental impacts. Born from ancient flora, decaying through epochs past, carbon-laden, fuelling eons in a vast contrast. Anthracite, bituminous, a trove of diverse grades, a worldwide energy titan, but with environmental shades. This study explores into the intricate impacts of coal-fired power plants, navigating the intersection of energy demand, environmental responsibility, and the historical legacy of this carbon-rich resource. In doing so, it employs the "cradle-to-gate" method of life cycle assessments (LCA), a well-researched approach that scrutinizes the entire life cycle of coal-fired power generation. During all three stages, fuel extraction, fuel transportation, and plant operation, basic hotspots of pollution are identified and their adverse effects on the environment are looked into. An analysis of a 530 MW power plant in China has been considered. This report uses both CML (Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden) 2001 (Baseline) and ReCiPe Midpoint (H) analyses to conduct a detailed comparative examination of the environmental implications of the plant's operation in addition to only the electricity generation. Climate change, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, acidification potential, marine aquatic ecotoxicity, etc are some of the hazards identified during the study. A better scientific approach following standard guidance and efficient management can help to mitigate the pollution caused. The article presents the results of studies of the diverse impact of coal generation on the environment and discusses the most environmentally friendly methods of using this type of fuel to generate electricity.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 630
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Water footprint comparison of a naphtha-fired combined cycle power plant and a coal-fired steam power plant
    Sankalp Arpit
    Prasanta Kumar Das
    Sukanta Kumar Dash
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194
  • [32] Life Cycle Assessment Analysis and Comparison of 1000 MW S-CO2 Coal Fired Power Plant and 1000 MW USC Water-Steam Coal-Fired Power Plant
    LI Mingjia
    WANG Ge
    XU Jinliang
    NI Jingwei
    SUN Enhui
    Journal of Thermal Science, 2022, 31 (02) : 463 - 484
  • [33] Life Cycle Assessment Analysis and Comparison of 1000 MW S-CO2Coal Fired Power Plant and 1000 MW USC Water-Steam Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Li, Mingjia
    Wang, Ge
    Xu, Jinliang
    Ni, Jingwei
    Sun, Enhui
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 31 (02) : 463 - 484
  • [34] Life Cycle Assessment Analysis and Comparison of 1000 MW S-CO2 Coal Fired Power Plant and 1000 MW USC Water-Steam Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Mingjia Li
    Ge Wang
    Jinliang Xu
    Jingwei Ni
    Enhui Sun
    Journal of Thermal Science, 2022, 31 : 463 - 484
  • [35] An empirical study on environmental efficiency of coal-fired power plant
    Wang, Xiping
    Meng, Ming
    Energy Education Science and Technology Part A: Energy Science and Research, 2013, 31 (04): : 2757 - 2760
  • [36] Study on denitrification technology improvement of a coal-fired power plant
    Yin, Lianqing
    Mao, Shudong
    Ji, Haihong
    Zhang, Shanshan
    ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, PTS 1-6, 2013, 726-731 : 1945 - +
  • [37] Coal-fired power plant escalations to continue, says study
    不详
    HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2008, 87 (01): : 27 - 27
  • [38] Health impact assessment of a proposed coal-fired power plant in Turkiye
    Etiler, Nilay
    Yikici, Ayse
    Akgul, Onur
    Myllyvirta, Lauri
    Uz, Dilek
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2024, 42 (01) : 56 - 69
  • [39] Critical Assessment of Membrane Technology Integration in a Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Alabid, Maytham
    Cormos, Calin-Cristian
    Dinca, Cristian
    MEMBRANES, 2022, 12 (09)
  • [40] A comparative prospective life cycle assessment of coal-fired power plants in the US with MEA/MOF-based carbon capture
    Tao, Yiran
    Brander, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 456