Misoprostol Vaginal Pessary Versus Dinoproston Vaginal Gel in Induction of Labour

被引:0
|
作者
Farrukh, Rubina [1 ]
Zill-E-Huma [1 ]
Qayyum, Shumaila [1 ]
机构
[1] Sir Ganga Ram Hosp, Fatima Jinnah Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
关键词
Dinoprostone vaginal gel; misoprostol vaginal pesary; induction of labour;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare misoprostol vaginal pessary with dinoprostone vaginal gel to know which of these two agents is more safe and effective for induction of labour Method: A Interventional quasi experimental study was carried out in Sir Ganga Ram hospital, Lahore over a period of six months from 13th Feb, 2007 to 13th Aug, 2007. A total of 100 women at 37-42 months of gestation were assigned into two groups. Fifty women in group A received dinoprostone vaginal gel and 50 women in group B received misoprostol vaginal pessary. Results: 68% in group A and 87% in group B deliver within 24 hours of induction. 60% patients in group A and 56% in group B had spontaneous vaginal delivery, 64% patients in group A and 66% patients in group B required oxytocin for augmentation. Nausea and vomiting was observed in 8% patients in group-B with no case reported in group A. Fetal and maternal complications were also comparable in both groups. Overall babies delivered with good APGAR score at 1 & 5 minute interval. Conclusion: Both dinoprostone vaginal gel and misoprostol vaginal pessary appears to be equally safe and effective for induction of labour.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 351
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate for labor induction
    El-Khayat, Waleed
    Alelaiw, Heba
    El-kateb, Abdallah
    Elsemary, Ali
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (03): : 487 - 492
  • [42] A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term
    Gregson, S
    Waterstone, M
    Norman, I
    Murrells, T
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 112 (04) : 438 - 444
  • [43] Labor Induction for Premature Rupture of Membranes Using Vaginal Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert
    Abraham, Cynthia
    Meirowitz, Natalie
    Kohn, Nina
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 31 (03) : 181 - 185
  • [44] Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: An individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Patabendige, Malitha
    Chan, Fei
    Vayssiere, Christophe
    Ehlinger, Virginie
    Van Gemund, Nicolette
    Le Cessie, Saskia
    Prager, Martina
    Marions, Lena
    Rozenberg, Patrick
    Chevret, Sylvie
    Young, David C.
    Le Roux, Paul A.
    Gregson, Sarah
    Waterstone, Mark
    Rolnik, Daniel L.
    Mol, Ben W.
    Li, Wentao
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 (09) : 1167 - 1180
  • [45] 'It's like rocket fuel': Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labour. Comparison of labour and delivery outcomes in a local UK context
    Rankin, K.
    Raymond, K.
    Bhaskar, S.
    Bajaj, P.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 94 - 94
  • [46] The effect of vaginal pH on the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
    Gunalp, S
    Bildirici, I
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 79 (04) : 283 - 285
  • [47] 'It's like rocket fuel': Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labour. Comparison of labour and delivery outcomes in a local UK context
    Rankin, K.
    Chodankar, R.
    Raymond, K.
    Bhaskar, S.
    Bajaj, P.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 6 - 6
  • [48] Women's experiences of induction of labour with misoprostol tablets compared with vaginal insert
    Hansen, Karen H.
    Eriksson, Axelina
    Jeppesen, Sarah
    Jeppegaard, Maria
    Krebs, Lone
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 70 (02):
  • [49] A randomised comparison of patient satisfaction with vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labour at term
    Nassar, A. H.
    Awwad, J.
    Khalil, A. M.
    Abu-Musa, A.
    Mehio, G.
    Usta, I. M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (10) : 1215 - 1221
  • [50] Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial
    Bartusevicius, A.
    Barcaite, E.
    Krikstolaitis, R.
    Gintautas, V.
    Nadisauskiene, R.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (12) : 1431 - 1437