Misoprostol Vaginal Pessary Versus Dinoproston Vaginal Gel in Induction of Labour

被引:0
|
作者
Farrukh, Rubina [1 ]
Zill-E-Huma [1 ]
Qayyum, Shumaila [1 ]
机构
[1] Sir Ganga Ram Hosp, Fatima Jinnah Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
关键词
Dinoprostone vaginal gel; misoprostol vaginal pesary; induction of labour;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare misoprostol vaginal pessary with dinoprostone vaginal gel to know which of these two agents is more safe and effective for induction of labour Method: A Interventional quasi experimental study was carried out in Sir Ganga Ram hospital, Lahore over a period of six months from 13th Feb, 2007 to 13th Aug, 2007. A total of 100 women at 37-42 months of gestation were assigned into two groups. Fifty women in group A received dinoprostone vaginal gel and 50 women in group B received misoprostol vaginal pessary. Results: 68% in group A and 87% in group B deliver within 24 hours of induction. 60% patients in group A and 56% in group B had spontaneous vaginal delivery, 64% patients in group A and 66% patients in group B required oxytocin for augmentation. Nausea and vomiting was observed in 8% patients in group-B with no case reported in group A. Fetal and maternal complications were also comparable in both groups. Overall babies delivered with good APGAR score at 1 & 5 minute interval. Conclusion: Both dinoprostone vaginal gel and misoprostol vaginal pessary appears to be equally safe and effective for induction of labour.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 351
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a randomised trial
    Kwon, JS
    Davies, GAL
    Mackenzie, VP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (01): : 23 - 26
  • [32] Induction of labour with vaginal prostaglandin tablet vs gel
    Khan, Z. A.
    Abdul, B.
    Majoko, F.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 31 (06) : 492 - 494
  • [33] Foley catheter or vaginal prostaglandin gel for labour induction
    Kelsall, Diane
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2011, 183 (17) : 2016 - 2016
  • [34] Dinoprostone vaginal pessary for induction of labour: Safety of use for up to 24 h
    Tathem, Kellie
    Harris, Lisa J.
    O'Rourke, Peter
    Kimble, Rebecca M.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 52 (06): : 582 - 587
  • [35] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF INTRA VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL TABLET VERSUS INTRA CERVICAL DINOPROSTONE GEL FOR CERVICAL RIPENING AND INDUCTION OF LABOUR
    Madhavi, K. N.
    Polaiah, K. P.
    Sivaiah, Thokala
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (11): : 1769 - 1775
  • [36] Comparison of vaginal misoprostol and oral misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for labor induction at term
    Sheela, C. N.
    Mhaskar, Arun
    George, Shirley
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2007, 57 (04): : 327 - 330
  • [37] Oral Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Tablets for Labor Induction
    Abu El Aish, Khaled Ibrahim
    Zourob, Haly Suliman
    CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 38 (03): : 382 - 389
  • [38] Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
    Vorontsova, Yana
    Haas, David M.
    Flannery, Kathleen
    Masters, Andrea R.
    Silva, Larissa L.
    Pierson, Rebecca C.
    Yeley, Brittany
    Hogg, Graham
    Guise, David
    Heathman, Michael
    Quinney, Sara K.
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2022, 15 (08): : 1937 - 1945
  • [39] Vaginal dinoprostone versus oral misoprostol for labour induction: Individual participant data meta-analysis
    Tan, S.
    Dallenbach, P.
    Dodd, J.
    Deussen, A.
    Leroux, P.
    Tessier, F.
    Young, D.
    Croll, D.
    Peel, M.
    Li, W.
    Mol, B. W.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 : 22 - 22
  • [40] Sublingual versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction of Term Pregnancies
    de Moraes Filho, Olimpio Barbosa
    de Albuquerque, Rivaldo Mendes
    Correia Pacheco, Alvaro Jose
    Ribeiro, Renata Holanda
    Cecatti, Jose Guilherme
    Welkovic, Stefan
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2005, 27 (01): : 24 - 31