Misoprostol Vaginal Pessary Versus Dinoproston Vaginal Gel in Induction of Labour

被引:0
|
作者
Farrukh, Rubina [1 ]
Zill-E-Huma [1 ]
Qayyum, Shumaila [1 ]
机构
[1] Sir Ganga Ram Hosp, Fatima Jinnah Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
关键词
Dinoprostone vaginal gel; misoprostol vaginal pesary; induction of labour;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare misoprostol vaginal pessary with dinoprostone vaginal gel to know which of these two agents is more safe and effective for induction of labour Method: A Interventional quasi experimental study was carried out in Sir Ganga Ram hospital, Lahore over a period of six months from 13th Feb, 2007 to 13th Aug, 2007. A total of 100 women at 37-42 months of gestation were assigned into two groups. Fifty women in group A received dinoprostone vaginal gel and 50 women in group B received misoprostol vaginal pessary. Results: 68% in group A and 87% in group B deliver within 24 hours of induction. 60% patients in group A and 56% in group B had spontaneous vaginal delivery, 64% patients in group A and 66% patients in group B required oxytocin for augmentation. Nausea and vomiting was observed in 8% patients in group-B with no case reported in group A. Fetal and maternal complications were also comparable in both groups. Overall babies delivered with good APGAR score at 1 & 5 minute interval. Conclusion: Both dinoprostone vaginal gel and misoprostol vaginal pessary appears to be equally safe and effective for induction of labour.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 351
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes
    Rankin, Katharine
    Chodankar, Rohan
    Raymond, Kyle
    Bhaskar, Swetha
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 235 : 93 - 96
  • [22] CONTRAST OF MISOPROSTOL VAGINAL PILL THROUGH DINOPROSTONE PGE 2 VAGINAL PESSARY FOR INITIATION OF LABOUR IN COMPLETE PERIOD PREGNANCY
    Iqbal, Muhammad Tahir
    Rasool, Muhammad Jahanzaib
    Farrukh, Zobia
    INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 6 (04): : 8246 - 8249
  • [23] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with that of vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term
    Sheela, C. N.
    John, C.
    Preethi, R.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 35 (05) : 469 - 471
  • [24] A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at term
    Shetty, A
    Danielian, P
    Templeton, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (03): : 238 - 243
  • [25] Titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction
    Souza, Alex S. R.
    Feitosa, Francisco E. L.
    Costa, Aurelio A. R.
    Pereira, Ana P. R.
    Carvalho, Andreza S.
    Paixao, Renata M.
    Katz, Leila
    Arnorim, Melania M. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 123 (03) : 207 - 212
  • [26] Oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction
    Bower, DJ
    Meurer, LN
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1999, 48 (01): : 9 - 10
  • [27] Compare the Efficacy of Dinoproston versus Misoprostol for Induction of Labor
    Parveen, Shazma
    Ayub, Najma
    Mufti, Saira Lateef
    Asghar, Sajida
    Durreshahwar
    Anwar, Khizera
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (04): : 1308 - 1310
  • [28] The effect of vaginal pH on labor induction with vaginal misoprostol
    Chandra, S
    Allen, VM
    Lee, W
    Fanning, CA
    Young, DC
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2005, 17 (06): : 387 - 391
  • [29] Comparison of Two Dosage Regimens of Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour at Term
    Iqbal, Saima
    Perwaiz, Mahwish
    Sohail, Rubina
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2009, 3 (04): : 346 - 349
  • [30] Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labour: Delivery outcomes and comparison with Dinoprostone
    Clark, A.
    Taggart, H.
    Noori, M.
    O'Dwyer, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 38 - 38