Misoprostol Vaginal Pessary Versus Dinoproston Vaginal Gel in Induction of Labour

被引:0
|
作者
Farrukh, Rubina [1 ]
Zill-E-Huma [1 ]
Qayyum, Shumaila [1 ]
机构
[1] Sir Ganga Ram Hosp, Fatima Jinnah Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
关键词
Dinoprostone vaginal gel; misoprostol vaginal pesary; induction of labour;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare misoprostol vaginal pessary with dinoprostone vaginal gel to know which of these two agents is more safe and effective for induction of labour Method: A Interventional quasi experimental study was carried out in Sir Ganga Ram hospital, Lahore over a period of six months from 13th Feb, 2007 to 13th Aug, 2007. A total of 100 women at 37-42 months of gestation were assigned into two groups. Fifty women in group A received dinoprostone vaginal gel and 50 women in group B received misoprostol vaginal pessary. Results: 68% in group A and 87% in group B deliver within 24 hours of induction. 60% patients in group A and 56% in group B had spontaneous vaginal delivery, 64% patients in group A and 66% patients in group B required oxytocin for augmentation. Nausea and vomiting was observed in 8% patients in group-B with no case reported in group A. Fetal and maternal complications were also comparable in both groups. Overall babies delivered with good APGAR score at 1 & 5 minute interval. Conclusion: Both dinoprostone vaginal gel and misoprostol vaginal pessary appears to be equally safe and effective for induction of labour.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 351
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
    Bolla, Daniele
    Weissleder, Saskia Vanessa
    Radan, Anda-Petronela
    Gasparri, Maria Luisa
    Raio, Luigi
    Mueller, Martin
    Surbek, Daniel
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18
  • [2] Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
    Daniele Bolla
    Saskia Vanessa Weissleder
    Anda-Petronela Radan
    Maria Luisa Gasparri
    Luigi Raio
    Martin Müller
    Daniel Surbek
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18
  • [3] Vaginal Prostaglandin E-2 Pessary Versus Gel in induction of Labour at Term
    Akram, H.
    Khanum, Z.
    Rana, T.
    ANNALS OF KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE PAKISTAN, 2005, 11 (04): : 370 - 372
  • [4] Misoprostol vaginal insert (Mysodelle) versus Dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin) for induction of labour
    Sharp, A.
    Faluyi, D.
    Alfirevic, Z.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 240 : 41 - 44
  • [5] Comparative Study of Vaginal Misoprostol and Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel for Induction of Labour
    Jadhav, Sneha Shahaji
    Shirsat, Arti Siddharth
    Risbud, Neelesh Sharad
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2020, 9 (34): : 2442 - 2446
  • [6] Comparison Between Use of Oral Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour at Term
    Prameela
    Sharma K.D.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2018, 68 (2) : 88 - 92
  • [7] Effectiveness of dinoprostone gel, misoprostol vaginal insert and dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labour in twin pregnancies
    Gent, J.
    Oliver, E.
    Quigley, H.
    Sharp, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 286 : 23 - 27
  • [8] Comparison of sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour: a systematic review
    Souza, A. S. R.
    Amorim, M. M. R.
    Feitosa, F. E. L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (11) : 1340 - 1349
  • [9] Induction of labour with oral misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol: A before-after study
    Duvillier, C.
    Gams, J.
    Rousseau, A.
    Rozenberg, P.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2022, 50 (06): : 475 - 480
  • [10] Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour
    Hofmeyr, G. Justus
    Gulmezoglu, A. Metin
    Pileggi, Cynthia
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (10):