IS IMMUNE FUNCTION BETTER PRESERVED AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN COLON RESECTION

被引:81
|
作者
BESSLER, M
WHELAN, RL
HALVERSON, A
TREAT, MR
NOWYGROD, R
机构
[1] Columbia University and the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, 10032, NY
关键词
IMMUNE FUNCTION; PRESERVATION; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/BF00843460
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate immunologic responses to laparoscopic vs standard open colon resection and to evaluate possible mediators of any differences found. Specifically, we compared cortisol levels and delayed-type hypersensitivity response after each method of colon resection in a group of 20 pigs. Two groups of 10 animals each were treated in identical fashion including bowel preparation, anesthesia, and postoperative management. The only difference between groups was that one underwent laparoscopic and the other an open colon resection. Blood specimens for cortisol were drawn before, during, and immediately postoperatively as well as at 11 A.M. on postoperative days 1 and 2. All animals had been previously immunized as piglets with Sow Bac-E (Oxford Veterinary, Worthington, MN), an antigen preparation of common pig pathogens. At the conclusion of the operative procedure 0.5 cc of the antigen was injected intradermally on the right forelimb of the animals. At 48 and 72 h postoperatively the largest diameters of induration surrounding the injection site were measured and averaged. Cortisol levels were measured in serum samples by radioimmunoassay (Met-Path, Rockville, MD). Statistical significance was determined by t-test. Results of skin antigen testing showed that the group of pigs that underwent laparoscopic resection had a 20% greater response, 1.54 cm +/- 0.28 cm at 48 h and 1.53 cm +/- 0.18 cm at 72 h. For the open-surgery group results were 1.24 cm +/- 0.26 cm at 48 h and 1.32 cm +/- 0.21 cm at 72 h, P < 0.05 for the difference between groups at both 48 and 72 h. Cortisol levels were not significantly different between groups at any of the time points. We conclude that T-cell-related immune function in this model, as measured by delayed-type hypersensitivity, is better preserved after laparoscopic than open colon resection. We further conclude that cortisol levels are not responsible for the improved preservation of the immune response. The benefits of improved postoperative immune function may be significant for patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 883
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: laparoscopic versus open resection
    Khalil, Ahmed
    Aboelnaga, Mohamed
    Omar, Wael
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 37 (03): : 375 - 383
  • [42] Oncologic outcomes after resection of rectal cancer: Laparoscopic versus open approach Discussion
    Phang, P. Terry
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 199 (05): : 602 - 603
  • [43] Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection - A randomized, blinded study
    Basse, L
    Jakobsen, DH
    Bardram, L
    Billesbolle, P
    Lund, C
    Mogensen, T
    Rosenberg, J
    Kehlet, H
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 241 (03) : 416 - 423
  • [44] Complications of Liver Resection: Laparoscopic Versus Open Procedures
    Slakey, Douglas P.
    Simms, Eric
    Drew, Barbara
    Yazdi, Farshid
    Roberts, Brett
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2013, 17 (01) : 46 - 55
  • [45] Laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatic colorectal metastases
    Cannon, Robert M.
    Scoggins, Charles R.
    Callender, Glenda G.
    McMasters, Kelly M.
    Martin, Robert C. G., II
    SURGERY, 2012, 152 (04) : 567 - 574
  • [46] Functional recovery takes 4 times as long after open resection for colon cancer compared to laparoscopic resection.
    Bhalla, A.
    Williams, J. P.
    Lund, J. N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 : 17 - 17
  • [47] Perioperative analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection
    Rowe, Andrea J.
    Meneghetti, Adam T.
    Schumacher, P. Andrew
    Buczkowski, Andrzej K.
    Scudamore, Charles H.
    Panton, O. Neely M.
    Chung, Stephen W.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (06): : 1198 - 1203
  • [48] Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population
    Katherine Grailey
    Sheraz R. Markar
    Alan Karthikesalingam
    Rima Aboud
    Paul Ziprin
    Omar Faiz
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 19 - 30
  • [49] Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population
    Grailey, Katherine
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Karthikesalingam, Alan
    Aboud, Rima
    Ziprin, Paul
    Faiz, Omar
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (01): : 19 - 30
  • [50] Perioperative analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection
    Andrea J. Rowe
    Adam T. Meneghetti
    P. Andrew Schumacher
    Andrzej K. Buczkowski
    Charles H. Scudamore
    O. Neely M. Panton
    Stephen W. Chung
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23 : 1198 - 1203