IS IMMUNE FUNCTION BETTER PRESERVED AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN COLON RESECTION

被引:81
|
作者
BESSLER, M
WHELAN, RL
HALVERSON, A
TREAT, MR
NOWYGROD, R
机构
[1] Columbia University and the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, 10032, NY
关键词
IMMUNE FUNCTION; PRESERVATION; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/BF00843460
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate immunologic responses to laparoscopic vs standard open colon resection and to evaluate possible mediators of any differences found. Specifically, we compared cortisol levels and delayed-type hypersensitivity response after each method of colon resection in a group of 20 pigs. Two groups of 10 animals each were treated in identical fashion including bowel preparation, anesthesia, and postoperative management. The only difference between groups was that one underwent laparoscopic and the other an open colon resection. Blood specimens for cortisol were drawn before, during, and immediately postoperatively as well as at 11 A.M. on postoperative days 1 and 2. All animals had been previously immunized as piglets with Sow Bac-E (Oxford Veterinary, Worthington, MN), an antigen preparation of common pig pathogens. At the conclusion of the operative procedure 0.5 cc of the antigen was injected intradermally on the right forelimb of the animals. At 48 and 72 h postoperatively the largest diameters of induration surrounding the injection site were measured and averaged. Cortisol levels were measured in serum samples by radioimmunoassay (Met-Path, Rockville, MD). Statistical significance was determined by t-test. Results of skin antigen testing showed that the group of pigs that underwent laparoscopic resection had a 20% greater response, 1.54 cm +/- 0.28 cm at 48 h and 1.53 cm +/- 0.18 cm at 72 h. For the open-surgery group results were 1.24 cm +/- 0.26 cm at 48 h and 1.32 cm +/- 0.21 cm at 72 h, P < 0.05 for the difference between groups at both 48 and 72 h. Cortisol levels were not significantly different between groups at any of the time points. We conclude that T-cell-related immune function in this model, as measured by delayed-type hypersensitivity, is better preserved after laparoscopic than open colon resection. We further conclude that cortisol levels are not responsible for the improved preservation of the immune response. The benefits of improved postoperative immune function may be significant for patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 883
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Incidence of small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection
    Alvarez-Downing, Melissa
    Klaassen, Zachary
    Orringer, Robert
    Gilder, Mark
    Tarantino, Debra
    Chamberlain, Ronald S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 201 (03): : 411 - 415
  • [12] The metabolic and immune response to laparoscopic versus open liver resection.
    Burpee, SE
    Kurian, M
    Murakami, Y
    Benevides, S
    Gagner, M
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 118 (04) : A1506 - A1506
  • [13] Recovery of gastrointestinal motility following open versus laparoscopic colon resection in dogs
    Hotokezaka, M
    Combs, MJ
    Schirmer, BD
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1996, 41 (04) : 705 - 710
  • [14] Gastrointestinal transit after laparoscopic versus open colonic resection
    L. Basse
    J. L. Madsen
    P. Billesbølle
    L. Bardram
    H. Kehlet
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2003, 17 : 1919 - 1922
  • [15] Incisional hernia after open versus laparoscopic sigmoid resection
    Andersen, Lars Peter Holst
    Klein, Mads
    Gogenur, Ismail
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (09): : 2026 - 2029
  • [16] Incisional hernia after open versus laparoscopic sigmoid resection
    Lars Peter Holst Andersen
    Mads Klein
    Ismail Gögenur
    Jacob Rosenberg
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2008, 22 : 2026 - 2029
  • [17] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RESECTION FOR COLON AND RECTAL CANCER.
    Jensen, C.
    Abcarian, H.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (05) : E186 - E187
  • [18] Prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic assisted versus open colon resection.
    Zucker, KA
    Curet, MJ
    Pitcher, DE
    Josloff, RK
    Miscall, BG
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 110 (04) : A1428 - A1428
  • [19] Survival after laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases
    Aghayan, Davit L.
    Fretland, Asmund Avdem
    Edwin, Bjorn
    HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2021, 10 (01) : 134 - 135
  • [20] Loop ileostomy reversal after laparoscopic versus open rectal resection
    Sebastian, Arie
    Stupart, Douglas
    Watters, David A.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 89 (03) : E52 - E55