IS IMMUNE FUNCTION BETTER PRESERVED AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN COLON RESECTION

被引:81
|
作者
BESSLER, M
WHELAN, RL
HALVERSON, A
TREAT, MR
NOWYGROD, R
机构
[1] Columbia University and the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, 10032, NY
关键词
IMMUNE FUNCTION; PRESERVATION; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/BF00843460
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate immunologic responses to laparoscopic vs standard open colon resection and to evaluate possible mediators of any differences found. Specifically, we compared cortisol levels and delayed-type hypersensitivity response after each method of colon resection in a group of 20 pigs. Two groups of 10 animals each were treated in identical fashion including bowel preparation, anesthesia, and postoperative management. The only difference between groups was that one underwent laparoscopic and the other an open colon resection. Blood specimens for cortisol were drawn before, during, and immediately postoperatively as well as at 11 A.M. on postoperative days 1 and 2. All animals had been previously immunized as piglets with Sow Bac-E (Oxford Veterinary, Worthington, MN), an antigen preparation of common pig pathogens. At the conclusion of the operative procedure 0.5 cc of the antigen was injected intradermally on the right forelimb of the animals. At 48 and 72 h postoperatively the largest diameters of induration surrounding the injection site were measured and averaged. Cortisol levels were measured in serum samples by radioimmunoassay (Met-Path, Rockville, MD). Statistical significance was determined by t-test. Results of skin antigen testing showed that the group of pigs that underwent laparoscopic resection had a 20% greater response, 1.54 cm +/- 0.28 cm at 48 h and 1.53 cm +/- 0.18 cm at 72 h. For the open-surgery group results were 1.24 cm +/- 0.26 cm at 48 h and 1.32 cm +/- 0.21 cm at 72 h, P < 0.05 for the difference between groups at both 48 and 72 h. Cortisol levels were not significantly different between groups at any of the time points. We conclude that T-cell-related immune function in this model, as measured by delayed-type hypersensitivity, is better preserved after laparoscopic than open colon resection. We further conclude that cortisol levels are not responsible for the improved preservation of the immune response. The benefits of improved postoperative immune function may be significant for patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 883
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Oncologic outcomes after resection of rectal cancer: Laparoscopic versus open approach
    Sambasivan, Chitra N.
    Deveney, Karen E.
    Morris, Katherine T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 199 (05): : 599 - 602
  • [32] Laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for immune function in patients with colorectal cancer
    Chuanyuan Liu
    Jungang Liu
    Sen Zhang
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2011, 26
  • [33] Laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for immune function in patients with colorectal cancer
    Liu, Chuanyuan
    Liu, Jungang
    Zhang, Sen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 26 (11) : 1375 - 1385
  • [34] Alterations in respiratory function after cholecystectomy - Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Eickhoff, H
    Milheiro, A
    Manso, LC
    Castro-Sousa, F
    EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMICS OF CLINICAL CARE AND RESEARCH IN SURGERY, 1997, SUPPL : 1105 - 1107
  • [35] Comparison of latrogenic splenectomy during open and laparoscopic colon resection
    Malek, Marcus M.
    Greenstein, Alexander J.
    Chin, Edward H.
    Nguyen, Scott Q.
    Sandler, Adam L.
    Wong, Ray K.
    Byrn, John C.
    Katz, Lester B.
    Divino, Celia M.
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2007, 17 (05): : 385 - 387
  • [36] Laparoscopic versus open resection for colon cancer: 10-year outcomes of a prospective clinical trial
    Allaix, Marco E.
    Giraudo, Giuseppe
    Mistrangelo, Massimiliano
    Arezzo, Alberto
    Morino, Mario
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (04): : 916 - 924
  • [37] Laparoscopic versus open resection for colon cancer: 10-year outcomes of a prospective clinical trial
    Marco E. Allaix
    Giuseppe Giraudo
    Massimiliano Mistrangelo
    Alberto Arezzo
    Mario Morino
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 916 - 924
  • [38] Laparoscopic Versus Open Colonic Resection: Better Design and Results Presentation are Required for Sufficient Interpretation Reply
    Klarenbeek, Bastiaan R.
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (03) : 496 - 496
  • [39] RECOVERY OF GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY IS MORE RAPID AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN COLON SURGERY
    HOTOKEZAKA, M
    COMBS, MJ
    SCHIRMER, BD
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 108 (04) : A617 - A617
  • [40] Laparoscopic Anterior Resection versus Open Anterior Resection for rectal cancer
    Gok, M. A.
    Malik, K. I.
    Ward, S. J.
    Sadat, M. M.
    Khan, U. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 188 - 188