IS IMMUNE FUNCTION BETTER PRESERVED AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN COLON RESECTION

被引:81
|
作者
BESSLER, M
WHELAN, RL
HALVERSON, A
TREAT, MR
NOWYGROD, R
机构
[1] Columbia University and the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, 10032, NY
关键词
IMMUNE FUNCTION; PRESERVATION; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/BF00843460
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate immunologic responses to laparoscopic vs standard open colon resection and to evaluate possible mediators of any differences found. Specifically, we compared cortisol levels and delayed-type hypersensitivity response after each method of colon resection in a group of 20 pigs. Two groups of 10 animals each were treated in identical fashion including bowel preparation, anesthesia, and postoperative management. The only difference between groups was that one underwent laparoscopic and the other an open colon resection. Blood specimens for cortisol were drawn before, during, and immediately postoperatively as well as at 11 A.M. on postoperative days 1 and 2. All animals had been previously immunized as piglets with Sow Bac-E (Oxford Veterinary, Worthington, MN), an antigen preparation of common pig pathogens. At the conclusion of the operative procedure 0.5 cc of the antigen was injected intradermally on the right forelimb of the animals. At 48 and 72 h postoperatively the largest diameters of induration surrounding the injection site were measured and averaged. Cortisol levels were measured in serum samples by radioimmunoassay (Met-Path, Rockville, MD). Statistical significance was determined by t-test. Results of skin antigen testing showed that the group of pigs that underwent laparoscopic resection had a 20% greater response, 1.54 cm +/- 0.28 cm at 48 h and 1.53 cm +/- 0.18 cm at 72 h. For the open-surgery group results were 1.24 cm +/- 0.26 cm at 48 h and 1.32 cm +/- 0.21 cm at 72 h, P < 0.05 for the difference between groups at both 48 and 72 h. Cortisol levels were not significantly different between groups at any of the time points. We conclude that T-cell-related immune function in this model, as measured by delayed-type hypersensitivity, is better preserved after laparoscopic than open colon resection. We further conclude that cortisol levels are not responsible for the improved preservation of the immune response. The benefits of improved postoperative immune function may be significant for patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 883
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans
    R.L. Whelan
    M. Franklin
    S.D. Holubar
    J. Donahue
    R. Fowler
    C. Munger
    J. Doorman
    J.E. Balli
    J. Glass
    J.-J. Gonzalez
    M. Bessler
    H. Xie
    M. Treat
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2003, 17 : 972 - 978
  • [2] Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans
    Whelan, RL
    Franklin, M
    Holubar, SD
    Donahue, J
    Fowler, R
    Munger, C
    Doorman, J
    Balli, JE
    Glass, J
    Gonzalez, JJ
    Bessler, M
    Xie, H
    Treat, M
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (06): : 972 - 978
  • [3] Survival and outcomes after laparoscopic versus open curative resection for colon cancer
    Hakami, Riyadh
    Alsaffar, Ali
    AlKhayal, Khayal A.
    Arab, Nahla
    Alshammari, Turki
    Almotairi, Eman D.
    Alturki, Neamat
    Falah, Salah Addin
    Albati, Naif Ali
    Hussain, Marwah
    Abdullah, Maha
    Abd Aljomah, Nadia
    Al Homoud, Samar
    Ashari, Luai
    Abduljabbar, Alaa
    Badahdah, Fatima Ahmed
    Albalawi, Saeed
    Alobaid, Omar
    Zubaidi, Ahmad
    Bin Traiki, Thamer
    Alsanea, Nasser
    Abdulfattah, Faroq Walid
    Abduldaem, Abdullah Mohammed
    Alqahtani, Saad
    Alharbi, Reem
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2019, 39 (03) : 137 - 142
  • [4] Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer
    Mistrangelo, Massimiliano
    Allaix, Marco Ettore
    Cassoni, Paola
    Giraudo, Giuseppe
    Arolfo, Simone
    Morino, Mario
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (08): : 2196 - 2202
  • [5] Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer
    Massimiliano Mistrangelo
    Marco Ettore Allaix
    Paola Cassoni
    Giuseppe Giraudo
    Simone Arolfo
    Mario Morino
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 2196 - 2202
  • [6] Better preservation of immune function after laparoscopic-assisted vs open bowel resection in a murine model
    Allendorf, JDF
    Bessler, M
    Whelan, RL
    Trokel, M
    Laird, DA
    Terry, MB
    Treat, MR
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (10) : S67 - S72
  • [7] Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Transverse Colon Cancer
    Wei-gen Zeng
    Meng-jia Liu
    Zhi-xiang Zhou
    Hui-rong Hou
    Jian-wei Liang
    Zheng Wang
    Xing-mao Zhang
    Jun-jie Hu
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2015, 19 : 1869 - 1874
  • [8] PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF LAPAROSCOPIC COLON RESECTION VERSUS OPEN COLON RESECTION FOR ADENOCARCINOMA - A MULTICENTER STUDY
    FRANKLIN, ME
    ROSENTHAL, D
    NOREM, RF
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1995, 9 (07): : 811 - 816
  • [9] Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Transverse Colon Cancer
    Zeng, Wei-gen
    Liu, Meng-jia
    Zhou, Zhi-xiang
    Hou, Hui-rong
    Liang, Jian-wei
    Wang, Zheng
    Zhang, Xing-mao
    Hu, Jun-jie
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (10) : 1869 - 1874
  • [10] Laparoscopic versus open resection in patients with locally advanced colon cancer
    Huynh, Caroline
    Minkova, Stephanie
    Kim, Diane
    Stuart, Heather
    Hamilton, Trevor D.
    SURGERY, 2021, 170 (06) : 1610 - 1615