Comparison of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for labour induction: a randomised controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Girija, Shivarudraiah [1 ]
Manjunath, Attibele Palaksha [1 ]
机构
[1] Kasturba Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India
关键词
Misoprostol; induction of labour; low dose; single dose;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of two different dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for labour induction. Material and methods: This is an open label randomised controlled trial of 100 eligible women with obstetrical or medical indications for labour induction at a secondary level care hospital on the west coast of India. Women were randomised to receive either a single 50 it g dose or multiple 25.8 doses (maximum of three doses) of misoprostol in the posterior vaginal fornix. The main outcome measure was induction to vaginal delivery interval. Results: Mean induction delivery interval was 18.58 +/- 13.73 and 14.42 +/- 13.2 hours (P=0.73) in the 50 itg and 25 mu g misoprostol group respectively. Delivery rate within 24 hours were 60% (30/50), in 50 eg group and 68% (34/50) in 25 yg group (P=0.53). The rates of caesarean section and operative vaginal delivery were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in maternal side effects and neonatal outcome among regimens. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between the two regimens in terms of clinical efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 225
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Misoprostol as Oral Solution or Oral Tablet for Induction of Labour (MISOBEST): A Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial
    Svensk, Elin
    Bessfelt, Emelie
    Wendel, Sophia Brismar
    Kallner, Helena Kopp
    Wallstroem, Tove
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2025, 132 (03) : 288 - 296
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
    O. Lapuente-Ocamica
    L. Ugarte
    A. Lopez-Picado
    F. Sanchez-Refoyo
    Iñaki Lete Lasa
    O. Echevarria
    J. Álvarez-Sala
    A. Fariñas
    I. Bilbao
    L. Barbero
    J. Vicarregui
    R. Hernanz Chaves
    D. Paz Corral
    J. A. Lopez-Lopez
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19
  • [43] Misoprostol versus dinoprostone for cervical priming prior to induction of labour in term pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.
    Rowlands, S
    Bell, R
    Donath, S
    Morrow, S
    Trudinger, BJ
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 41 (02): : 145 - 152
  • [44] Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening:A randomised controlled trial
    Aduloju, Olusola Peter
    Akintayo, Akinyemi Akinsoji
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 (01): : 119 - 119
  • [45] Combination of misoprostol and mechanical dilation for induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial
    Kehl, Sven
    Ehard, Anna
    Berlit, Sebastian
    Spaich, Saskia
    Suetterlin, Marc
    Siemer, Joern
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 159 (02) : 315 - 319
  • [46] Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial
    Aduloju, Olusola P.
    Akintayo, Akinyemi A.
    Adanikin, Abiodun I.
    Ade-Ojo, Idowu P.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 56 (06): : 578 - 584
  • [47] Misoprostol Vaginal Insert for Successful Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wing, Deborah A.
    Miller, Hugh
    Parker, Lamar
    Powers, Barbara L.
    Rayburn, William F.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (03): : 533 - 541
  • [48] Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction:: A randomized controlled trial
    Dällenbach, P
    Boulvain, M
    Viardot, C
    Irion, O
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (01) : 162 - 167
  • [49] Oral Misoprostol or vaginal Dinoprostone for labor induction? Randomized controlled trial
    Dallen-Bach, P
    Boulvain, M
    Viardot, C
    Irion, O
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) : S108 - S108
  • [50] Misoprostol Vaginal Pessary Versus Dinoproston Vaginal Gel in Induction of Labour
    Farrukh, Rubina
    Zill-E-Huma
    Qayyum, Shumaila
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2014, 8 (02): : 347 - 351