Comparison of two dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for labour induction: a randomised controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Girija, Shivarudraiah [1 ]
Manjunath, Attibele Palaksha [1 ]
机构
[1] Kasturba Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India
关键词
Misoprostol; induction of labour; low dose; single dose;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of two different dosing regimens of vaginal misoprostol for labour induction. Material and methods: This is an open label randomised controlled trial of 100 eligible women with obstetrical or medical indications for labour induction at a secondary level care hospital on the west coast of India. Women were randomised to receive either a single 50 it g dose or multiple 25.8 doses (maximum of three doses) of misoprostol in the posterior vaginal fornix. The main outcome measure was induction to vaginal delivery interval. Results: Mean induction delivery interval was 18.58 +/- 13.73 and 14.42 +/- 13.2 hours (P=0.73) in the 50 itg and 25 mu g misoprostol group respectively. Delivery rate within 24 hours were 60% (30/50), in 50 eg group and 68% (34/50) in 25 yg group (P=0.53). The rates of caesarean section and operative vaginal delivery were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in maternal side effects and neonatal outcome among regimens. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between the two regimens in terms of clinical efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 225
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMPARISON OF TWO STEROID REGIMENS IN INDUCTION THERAPY OF PROLIFERATIVE LUPUS NEPHRITIS: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Bharati, Joyita
    Gupta, Krishan
    Ramachandran, Rajha
    Rathi, Manish
    Sharma, Aman
    Nada, Ritambhra
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 33
  • [22] A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term
    Shetty, A
    Livingstone, I
    Acharya, S
    Rice, P
    Danielian, P
    Templeton, A
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (05) : 436 - 440
  • [23] Intravaginal isosorbide dinitrate or misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to induction of labour: A randomised controlled trial
    Haghighi, L.
    Homam, H.
    Raoofi, Z.
    Najmi, Z.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 33 (03) : 272 - 276
  • [24] A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction
    Prager, M.
    Eneroth-Grimfors, E.
    Edlund, M.
    Marions, L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (11) : 1443 - 1450
  • [25] Comparison Between Use of Oral Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour at Term
    Prameela
    Sharma K.D.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2018, 68 (2) : 88 - 92
  • [27] Comparison of sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour: a systematic review
    Souza, A. S. R.
    Amorim, M. M. R.
    Feitosa, F. E. L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (11) : 1340 - 1349
  • [28] Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labour: Delivery outcomes and comparison with Dinoprostone
    Clark, A.
    Taggart, H.
    Noori, M.
    O'Dwyer, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 38 - 38
  • [29] A comparison of two methods of labor induction with vaginal misoprostol
    Rockhead, C
    Fletcher, H
    Reid, M
    Morgan, O
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2003, 80 (03) : 271 - 277
  • [30] Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
    Young, David C.
    Delaney, Tina
    Armson, B. Anthony
    Fanning, Cora
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):