Eco-material selection using fuzzy TOPSIS method

被引:37
|
作者
Mayyas, Ahmad [1 ]
Omar, Mohammed A. [2 ]
Hayajneh, Mohammed T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Transportat Sustainabil Res Ctr, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Masdar Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Engn Syst & Management, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[3] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Engn, Irbid, Jordan
关键词
Automobile; design for sustainability; fuzzy logic; material selection; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1080/19397038.2016.1153168
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the classical multiple attribute decision-making or MADM methods, the ratings and the weights of the criteria are known precisely. However, in eco-material selection exercises, the available data are typically inadequate because of the selection dual quantitative and qualitative natures. Some of the qualitative selection criteria can be rated in several classes rather being expressed by exact numerical values; hence the application of fuzzy concepts in decision-making seems attractive to deal with such kind of ratings. Thusly, the presented study attempts to propose an eco-material selection approach specific to the automobile body panels using a fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), to incorporate both numerical and rating-based criteria into one holistic sustainability model. TOPSIS and fuzzy logic can aid the material selection process in translating the design goals and parameters into usable numbers that in turn can be used to rank candidate materials in their closeness to the ideal solution. An additional uniqueness of this study stems from using the fuzzy-TOPSIS as a scoring tool without any assigned weights for the different selection attributes, in order to avoid the bias that is typically associated with other classical MADM, such as quality function deployment, analytical hierarchy process and digital logic.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 304
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantitative analysis of micro-porosity of eco-material by using SEM technique
    Ji-ru Zhang
    Yuan-zhi Liu
    Zu-de Liu
    Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed., 2004, 19 : 35 - 37
  • [22] Multifactor Personnel Selection by the Fuzzy TOPSIS Method
    Aliyeva, Kamala
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND APPLICATION OF FUZZY SYSTEMS AND SOFT COMPUTING - ICAFS-2018, 2019, 896 : 478 - 483
  • [23] Criteria for evaluation for eco-material and the case study in Japan
    Nara, Matsunori
    ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS, 2011, 685 : 195 - 201
  • [24] Research of Meso-pore Structures of Eco-material
    Tao, Gaoliang
    Bai, Liang
    Zhuang, Xinshan
    Hu, Qizhi
    ADVANCES IN IMAGE AND GRAPHICS TECHNOLOGIES, IGTA 2016, 2016, 634 : 8 - 16
  • [25] An Application of Fuzzy Topsis Method for Supplier Selection
    Sevkli, Mehmet
    Zaim, Selim
    Turkyilmaz, Ali
    Satir, Metin
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE 2010), 2010,
  • [26] Project selection by using a fuzzy topsis technique
    Department of Industrial Engineering, Bojnourd University, Boujnourd, Iran
    不详
    World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2009, (85-90):
  • [27] Selection of optimal aluminum alloy using TOPSIS method under fuzzy environment
    Bhattacharjee, Pushparenu
    Debnath, Abhiman
    Chakraborty, Sujoy
    Mandal, Uttam Kumar
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (01) : 871 - 876
  • [28] Iron-Making Technology Selection Using a Fuzzy Hierarchical TOPSIS Method
    Towhidi, Nasser
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza
    Peymandar, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF IRON AND STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 16 : 1039 - 1044
  • [29] PROJECT SELECTION BY USING FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD: A REAL APPLICATION IN CONSTRUCTION SECTOR
    Bolat, Bersam
    Temur, Gul Tekin
    Dursun, Pinar
    Onursal, Burc
    UNCERTAINTY MODELING IN KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 7 : 137 - 142
  • [30] Ocean Container Carrier Selection Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method: Customers' Perspective
    Ergin, Ayfer
    Feizollahi, Mohammad Javad
    Kutlu, Can
    MARINE TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2022, 56 (01) : 59 - 71