Ten commandments of Lean Six Sigma: a practitioners' perspective

被引:74
|
作者
Antony, Jiju [1 ]
Gupta, Sandeep [1 ]
Sunder, Vijaya M. [2 ]
Gijo, E. V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Dept Business Management, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Dept Management Studies, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Indian Stat Inst, SQC & OR Unit, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Six Sigma; Lean; Continuous improvement; Lean Six Sigma; Process excellence; Ten commandments;
D O I
10.1108/IJPPM-07-2017-0170
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide lean and six sigma professionals and researchers of tomorrow with Ten Commandments of Lean Six Sigma (LSS). Design/methodology/approach The Ten Commandments of LSS are based on several years' experience of four authors who act as researchers, LSS Master Black Belts, consultants, practitioners and trainers on various topics of Lean, Six Sigma and general quality management and continuous improvement. Findings The Ten Commandments in our opinion include: alignment of LSS initiative with organisational strategy, LSS project selection and prioritisation, selection of top talent for the project execution, leadership for LSS, effective training and design of appropriate curriculum for different LSS roles, development of reward and recognition system, LSS sustainability, Linking LSS with Organisational Learning and Innovation, Linking LSS with Environmental Management System Standards and finally LSS and Big Data. Research limitations/implications The key features outlined in this paper are based on the practitioners of LSS. The authors of this article are planning to pursue a global study to critically evaluate these commandments by various practitioners of LSS. Originality/value The senior managers and executives of various businesses can use these commandments of LSS as a guide to achieve and sustain competitive advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1044
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Lean Six Sigma and anesthesia
    de Brito Cancado, Thais Orrico
    Cancado, Fernando Brito
    Abramides Torres, Marcelo Luis
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2019, 69 (05): : 502 - 509
  • [22] An empirical analysis of Lean Six Sigma implementation in SMEs - a migratory perspective
    Thomas, Andrew
    Ringwald, Kath
    Parfitt, Scott
    Davies, Alan
    John, Elwyn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (08) : 888 - +
  • [23] Digital transformations and supply chain management: a Lean Six Sigma perspective
    Tay, Huay Ling
    Loh, Hui Shan
    JOURNAL OF ASIA BUSINESS STUDIES, 2022, 16 (02) : 340 - 353
  • [24] The ten commandments perspective on power and authority in organizations
    Ali, AJ
    Camp, RC
    Gibbs, M
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2000, 26 (04) : 351 - 361
  • [25] The Ten Commandments Perspective on Power and Authority in Organizations
    Abbas J. Ali
    Robert C. Camp
    Manton Gibbs
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2000, 26 : 351 - 361
  • [26] A conceptual examination of Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma models for managing waste in manufacturing SMEs
    Sodhi, Harsimran Singh
    Singh, Doordarshi
    Singh, Bikram Jit
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 17 (01): : 20 - 32
  • [27] Lean Six Sigma 4.0-a framework and review for Lean Six Sigma practices in the digital era
    Citybabu, G.
    Yamini, S.
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 31 (09) : 3288 - 3326
  • [28] Implementation of Lean and Six Sigma quality initiatives in hospitals: A goal theoretic perspective
    Langabeer J.R.
    DelliFraine J.L.
    Heineke J.
    Abbass I.
    Operations Management Research, 2009, 2 (1-4) : 13 - 27
  • [29] Production lessening analysis of manufacturing unit in India: Lean Six Sigma perspective
    Kumar, Pankaj
    Singh, Mahipal
    Phull, Gurpreet Singh
    JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2019, 4 (04) : 281 - 290
  • [30] Lean, six sigma and lean sigma: fads or real process improvement methods?
    Naeslund, Dag
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 14 (03) : 269 - 287