A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUPINE TRANSGLUTEAL EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND URETEROSCOPY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DISTAL URETERIC STONES

被引:0
|
作者
Ramaraju, Karunamoorthy [1 ]
Rajan, Karthik [1 ]
Kanagaraju, Arivazhagan [1 ]
Chennakrishnan, Ilamparuthi [1 ]
机构
[1] Madras Med Coll & Govt Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS | 2016年 / 5卷 / 77期
关键词
ESWL; Ureteroscopy; Distal Ureteric Stones;
D O I
10.14260/jemds/2016/1282
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The ureteral calculus in general presents as acute colicky pain and the aim of treatment is to achieve complete stone clearance with minimal morbidity for the patient. Of the available treatment options for the management of lower ureteric stones, semirigid ureterorenoscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy has the best results with little morbidity. However, ESWL is a safe and non-invasive technique with minimal morbidity. We have studied the outcomes of ESWL for distal ureteric stones and compared it with the ureterorenoscopy which is the current modality of choice. METHODS A total of 120 patients were included in the study. They were randomly divided into two groups by an independent observer into group A (70 patients) and group B (50 patients). The patients in group A were managed by supine transgluteal ESWL as described below and those in group B were managed by semirigid ureteroscopy. Patients were followed up at 15 days, 30 days and 90 days. Failure was defined as the presence of fragments of any size in the followup film 3 months after the final ESWL session. RESULTS The demographic parameters and stone characteristics were comparable between the two groups. In our study, overall stone free rate at three months was 93.8% (107/114). Clearance in the ESWL group was 89.4% (59/66) and in the URS group was 100% (48/48). This difference; however, was not statistically significant. However, there was an increased incidence of complications in the URS group, (24.2% vs. 39.6%), though most of the complications were mild requiring no active intervention. This difference was also not statistically significant (p=0.10). CONCLUSION Supine transgluteal SWL for distal ureteric stones, the results are comparable with that of ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy with specific advantages in carefully selected patients. It can be recommended as a non-invasive alternative for patients who are not fit or unwilling for surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:5684 / 5687
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in the Management of a Large Proximal Ureteric Stone: A Case Report
    Freeg, M. A. H. A.
    Ranade, A., V
    Muttappallymyalil, J.
    Ghaffar, T. F. A.
    NEPAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 1 (02): : 70 - 73
  • [42] Role of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones
    Batra, R.
    Batra, P.
    Bokariya, P.
    Kothari, R.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 24 (03) : 186 - 190
  • [43] Comparison between ureteroscopy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of distal ureteral stones
    Kara, Cengiz
    Bayindir, Mirze
    Cicekbilek, Izzet
    Oguz, Ural
    Unsal, Ali
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 35 (01): : 28 - 33
  • [44] IN-SITU EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY OF DISTAL URETERAL STONES - PARAMETERS FOR THERAPEUTIC SUCCESS
    MATTELAER, P
    SCHRODER, T
    FISCHER, N
    JAKSE, G
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1994, 53 (02) : 87 - 91
  • [45] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY VERSUS FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF UPPER TRACT URINARY STONES IN CHILDREN: A CASE-CONTROL NON RANDOMIZED STUDY
    Peyronnet, Benoit
    Arnaud, Alexis
    Tondut, Lauranne
    Freton, Lucas
    Berquet, Gaetan
    Verhoest, Gregory
    Azzis, Olivier
    Fremond, Benjamin
    Bensalah, Karim
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E450 - E450
  • [46] Laser and Pneumatic Lithotripsy in the Endoscopic Management of Large Ureteric Stones: A Comparative Study
    Kassem, Ayman
    ElFayoumy, Hany
    ElSaied, Wael
    ElGammal, Mohamed
    Bedair, Ahmed
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2012, 88 (03) : 311 - 315
  • [47] Outcome of management of proximal and distal ureteric stones in children: A comparative study
    Iqbal, Nadeem
    Akhter, Saeed
    Sheikh, Abdul Ahad Ehsan
    Malik, Yashfeen
    Bhatti, Shimron Innocent
    Hasan, Aisha
    Iftikhar, Faisal
    Ilyas, Syeda Maryam
    Bhatti, Joshua Rahat Aleman
    Shabbir, Muhammad Usman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 : 95 - 95
  • [48] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY OF DISTAL URETERAL CALCULI
    MILLER, K
    BUBECK, JR
    HAUTMANN, R
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1986, 12 (05) : 305 - 307
  • [49] Comparison of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureterorenoscopic Holmium Laser lithotripsy in proximal ureteric stone management
    Jalbani, Malik Hussain
    Patujo, Yassar Husain
    Shaikh, Aamir Ali
    Shaikh, Ahmed Bux
    Meerani, Azizullah
    Abbassi, Sajid Ali
    Shaikh, Nisar Ahmed
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 44 (01): : 67 - 70
  • [50] Efficacy and patient satisfaction of flexible ureteroscopy, semirigid ureteroscopy and extracorporeal shockwaves lithotripsy in the management of proximal ureteric stones .5 to 1.5 cm: A randomized trial
    Abdelghafour, Tharwat A.
    Maarouf, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S532 - S532