A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUPINE TRANSGLUTEAL EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND URETEROSCOPY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DISTAL URETERIC STONES

被引:0
|
作者
Ramaraju, Karunamoorthy [1 ]
Rajan, Karthik [1 ]
Kanagaraju, Arivazhagan [1 ]
Chennakrishnan, Ilamparuthi [1 ]
机构
[1] Madras Med Coll & Govt Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS | 2016年 / 5卷 / 77期
关键词
ESWL; Ureteroscopy; Distal Ureteric Stones;
D O I
10.14260/jemds/2016/1282
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The ureteral calculus in general presents as acute colicky pain and the aim of treatment is to achieve complete stone clearance with minimal morbidity for the patient. Of the available treatment options for the management of lower ureteric stones, semirigid ureterorenoscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy has the best results with little morbidity. However, ESWL is a safe and non-invasive technique with minimal morbidity. We have studied the outcomes of ESWL for distal ureteric stones and compared it with the ureterorenoscopy which is the current modality of choice. METHODS A total of 120 patients were included in the study. They were randomly divided into two groups by an independent observer into group A (70 patients) and group B (50 patients). The patients in group A were managed by supine transgluteal ESWL as described below and those in group B were managed by semirigid ureteroscopy. Patients were followed up at 15 days, 30 days and 90 days. Failure was defined as the presence of fragments of any size in the followup film 3 months after the final ESWL session. RESULTS The demographic parameters and stone characteristics were comparable between the two groups. In our study, overall stone free rate at three months was 93.8% (107/114). Clearance in the ESWL group was 89.4% (59/66) and in the URS group was 100% (48/48). This difference; however, was not statistically significant. However, there was an increased incidence of complications in the URS group, (24.2% vs. 39.6%), though most of the complications were mild requiring no active intervention. This difference was also not statistically significant (p=0.10). CONCLUSION Supine transgluteal SWL for distal ureteric stones, the results are comparable with that of ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy with specific advantages in carefully selected patients. It can be recommended as a non-invasive alternative for patients who are not fit or unwilling for surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:5684 / 5687
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is ureteroscopy superior to lithotripsy for proximal ureteric stones
    Baadkar, R.
    English, S.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 29 - 29
  • [22] Author Correction to: The transgluteal approach to shockwave lithotripsy to treat distal ureter stones: a prospective, randomized, and multicenter study
    Min Soo Choo
    Jun Hyun Han
    Jong Keun Kim
    Tae Young Shin
    Won Ki Lee
    Sang Kon Lee
    Seong Ho Lee
    World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 1307 - 1307
  • [23] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND URETERAL STONES
    MEACHAM, R
    CARLTON, CE
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (04): : A151 - A151
  • [24] Efficacy Management of Urolithiasis: Flexible Ureteroscopy versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy
    Tauber, Volkmar
    Wohlmuth, Martin
    Hochmuth, Andreas
    Schimetta, Wofgang
    Krause, F. Steffen
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 95 (03) : 324 - 328
  • [25] Primary ureteroscopy for distal-ureteral stones compared with ureteroscopy after failed extracorporeal lithotripsy
    Tugcu, Volkan
    Gurbuz, Gokhan
    Aras, Bekir
    Gurkan, Levent
    Otunctemur, Alper
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (12) : 1025 - 1029
  • [26] Ureteroscopy and pneumatic lithotripsy, followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral stones
    Gurbuz, ZG
    Gonen, M
    Fazlioglu, A
    Akbulut, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 9 (08) : 441 - 444
  • [27] Fertility measures in women after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of distal ureteral stones
    Erturk, E
    Ptak, AM
    Monaghan, J
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1997, 11 (05) : 315 - 317
  • [28] Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in distal ureteral stones
    Gong, Zheng
    Li, Yipeng
    Zhang, Huijing
    Pan, Chunyu
    Li, Jia
    Liu, Gang
    Bai, Song
    UROLITHIASIS, 2023, 51 (01)
  • [29] Semen changes after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for distal-ureteral stones
    Sayed, Mohamed Abdel-Basir
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (07) : 483 - 485
  • [30] Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in distal ureteral stones
    Zheng Gong
    Yipeng Li
    Huijing Zhang
    Chunyu Pan
    Jia Li
    Gang Liu
    Song Bai
    Urolithiasis, 51