Minimally Invasive Decompression and Physiotherapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Geriatric Patients

被引:2
|
作者
Hoffman, Haydn [1 ]
Bennett, Shelley S. [2 ]
Li, Charles H. [1 ]
Haakana, Piia [1 ]
Lu, Daniel C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Neurosurg, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Phys Therapy, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
CUREUS | 2018年 / 10卷 / 06期
关键词
spinal stenosis; lumbar decompression; postoperative rehabilitation;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.2785
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common indication for spine surgery among the geriatric population. Although decompressive surgery is effective, older patients do not benefit as much as younger patients, and they are frequently excluded from studies assessing postoperative physiotherapy. We sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes after surgery when a novel postoperative physiotherapy regimen was included. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with LSS greater than 70 years old who underwent lumbar decompressive surgery by the senior author over the past five years. We evaluated patients who participated in a novel postoperative physiotherapy regimen involving four phases of rehabilitation aimed at progressively independent ambulation. The visual analog scale (VAS), lower extremity motor strength, and functional independence measure (FIM) were collected preoperatively and after physiotherapy to measure outcomes. Results Ten consecutive patients with an average age of 83 years (range: 71 - 96) met the inclusion criteria. Nine patients underwent minimally invasive laminotomies at L4-L5 and one underwent a laminotomy at L3-L4. The average follow-up time was 41.9 months. The preoperative mean VAS was 7.35, and at the end of the study, it was 1.7 (p = 0.005). Three of the four patients with preoperative motor deficits improved. The median transfer and locomotion subscores of the FIM were six preoperatively and increased to seven postoperatively. Neither of these improvements was significant. Conclusions Patients older than 70 years undergoing decompressive surgery and a novel postoperative physiotherapy regimen experienced significant reductions in pain. Independence also increased; however, this did not reach statistical significance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Bilateral Decompression with a Unilateral Approach (endo-BiDUA) for Elderly Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis
    Wada, K.
    Sairyo, K.
    Sakai, T.
    Yasui, N.
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 53 (02) : 65 - 68
  • [42] DECOMPRESSION OF LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
    KARASICK, JL
    NEUROSURGERY, 1990, 27 (03) : 499 - 499
  • [43] Minimally invasive decompression in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Report of a surgical series and review of the literature
    Montano, Nicola
    Stifano, Vito
    Papacci, Fabio
    Mazzucchi, Edoardo
    Fernandez, Eduardo
    NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2018, 52 (04) : 448 - 458
  • [44] Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis
    Hasan, Saqib
    McGrath, Lynn B., Jr.
    Sen, Rajeev D.
    Barber, Jason K.
    Hofstetter, Christoph P.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2019, 46 (05)
  • [45] Minimally invasive spinal decompression for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis maintains stability and may avoid the need for fusion
    Minamide, A.
    Yoshida, M.
    Simpson, A. K.
    Nakagawa, Y.
    Iwasaki, H.
    Tsutsui, S.
    Takami, M.
    Hashizume, H.
    Yukawa, Y.
    Yamada, H.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (04): : 499 - 506
  • [46] Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes
    Minamide, Akihito
    Yoshida, Munehito
    Iwahashi, Hiroki
    Simpson, Andrew K.
    Yamada, Hiroshi
    Hashizume, Hiroshi
    Nakagawa, Yukihiro
    Iwasaki, Hiroshi
    Tsutsui, Shunji
    Kagotani, Ryohei
    Sonekatsu, Mayumi
    Sasaki, Takahide
    Shinto, Kazunori
    Deguchi, Tsuyoshi
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2017, 22 (03) : 377 - 383
  • [47] Uniportal Full-Endoscopic versus Minimally Invasive Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yuqing
    Yin, Jianjian
    Nong, Luming
    Xu, Nanwei
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 83 (06) : 523 - 534
  • [48] Minimally invasive decompression with posterior column reinforcement for the treatment of symptomatic osteoporotic fracture with spinal stenosis in lumbar vertebrae
    Hsu, Wen-Hsing
    Lui, Tai-Ngar
    Chang, Chen-Nen
    Hsu, Yung-Hsin
    Lin, Chih-Lung
    Yang, Dao-Jen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 18 (12) : 1645 - 1650
  • [49] Minimally Invasive Decompression Versus X-Stop in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study
    Lonne, Greger
    Johnsen, Lars Gunnar
    Rossvoll, Ivar
    Andresen, Hege
    Storheim, Kjersti
    Zwart, John Anker
    Nygaard, Oystein P.
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (02) : 77 - 85
  • [50] Incidence of subsequent surgical decompression following minimally invasive approaches to treat lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective review
    Shahzad, Hania
    Hussain, Nasir
    D'Souza, Ryan S.
    Bhatti, Nazihah
    Orhurhu, Vwaire
    Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
    Simopoulos, Thomas
    Essandoh, Michael K.
    Khan, Safdar N.
    Weaver, Tristan
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2024, 24 (03) : 431 - 439