Minimally Invasive Decompression and Physiotherapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Geriatric Patients

被引:2
|
作者
Hoffman, Haydn [1 ]
Bennett, Shelley S. [2 ]
Li, Charles H. [1 ]
Haakana, Piia [1 ]
Lu, Daniel C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Neurosurg, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Phys Therapy, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
CUREUS | 2018年 / 10卷 / 06期
关键词
spinal stenosis; lumbar decompression; postoperative rehabilitation;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.2785
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common indication for spine surgery among the geriatric population. Although decompressive surgery is effective, older patients do not benefit as much as younger patients, and they are frequently excluded from studies assessing postoperative physiotherapy. We sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes after surgery when a novel postoperative physiotherapy regimen was included. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with LSS greater than 70 years old who underwent lumbar decompressive surgery by the senior author over the past five years. We evaluated patients who participated in a novel postoperative physiotherapy regimen involving four phases of rehabilitation aimed at progressively independent ambulation. The visual analog scale (VAS), lower extremity motor strength, and functional independence measure (FIM) were collected preoperatively and after physiotherapy to measure outcomes. Results Ten consecutive patients with an average age of 83 years (range: 71 - 96) met the inclusion criteria. Nine patients underwent minimally invasive laminotomies at L4-L5 and one underwent a laminotomy at L3-L4. The average follow-up time was 41.9 months. The preoperative mean VAS was 7.35, and at the end of the study, it was 1.7 (p = 0.005). Three of the four patients with preoperative motor deficits improved. The median transfer and locomotion subscores of the FIM were six preoperatively and increased to seven postoperatively. Neither of these improvements was significant. Conclusions Patients older than 70 years undergoing decompressive surgery and a novel postoperative physiotherapy regimen experienced significant reductions in pain. Independence also increased; however, this did not reach statistical significance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The durability of minimally invasive lumbar decompression procedure in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: Long-term follow-up
    Mekhail, Nagy
    Costandi, Shrif
    Nageeb, George
    Ekladios, Catherine
    Saied, Ogena
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2021, 21 (08) : 826 - 835
  • [32] Full Endoscopic Transforaminal Decompression Surgery for Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Geriatric Patients
    Yang, Jin
    Wu, Hao
    Kong, Qingquan
    Wang, Yu
    Peng, Zhiyu
    Zhang, Lifeng
    Yan, Yuqing
    Guo, Chuan
    Zhang, Dongfeng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 127 : E449 - E459
  • [33] The incidence of lumbar spine surgery following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression and Superion Indirect Decompression System for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective review
    Hagedorn, Jonathan M.
    Yadav, Abhishek
    D'Souza, Ryan S.
    DeTemple, Nathan
    Wolff, Jason S.
    Parmele, James B.
    Deer, Timothy R.
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2022, 22 (05) : 516 - 521
  • [34] Clinical Results of 10-mm Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Interlaminar Decompression in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Simple Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Li, Pengfei
    Shi, Zhen
    Jiang, Yunduo
    Peng, Zhibin
    Wang, Yansong
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2023, 18 : 911 - 919
  • [35] No differences between physiotherapy and decompression surgery for patients considered surgical candidates for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Hagen, Kare Birger
    Grotle, Margreth
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2016, 62 (01) : 49 - 49
  • [36] Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression for the Lumbar Spine A Minimally Invasive New Procedure for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis
    Hatta, Yoichiro
    Shiraishi, Tateru
    Sakamoto, Atsuto
    Yato, Yoshiyuki
    Harada, Tomohisa
    Mikami, Yasuo
    Hase, Hitoshi
    Kubo, Toshikazu
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (08) : E276 - E280
  • [37] Minimally invasive lumbar decompression
    Tredway, Trent L.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 17 (04) : 467 - +
  • [38] Minimally invasive direct decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: impact of multiple prior epidural steroid injections
    Pryzbylkowski, Peter
    Bux, Anjum
    Chandwani, Kailash
    Khemlani, Vishal
    Puri, Shawn
    Rosenberg, Jason
    Sukumaran, Harry
    PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2021, 12 (02) : 149 - 158
  • [39] Minimally invasive lumbar decompression for lumbar stenosis: review of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness
    Johans, S. J.
    Amin, B. Y.
    Mummaneni, P. V.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 59 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [40] Effects of minimally invasive decompression surgery on quality of life in older patients with spinal stenosis
    Dagistan, Yasar
    Dagistan, Emine
    Gezici, Ali Riza
    Cancan, Seckin Emre
    Bilgi, Murat
    Cakir, Ugur
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 139 : 86 - 90